Skip to main content
Log in

A distance-based variety of nonlinear multivariate data analysis, including weights for objects and variables

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the distance approach to nonlinear multivariate data analysis the focus is on the optimal representation of the relationships between the objects in the analysis. In this paper two methods are presented for including weights in distance-based nonlinear multivariate data analysis. In the first method, weights are assigned to the objects while the second method is concerned with differential weighting of groups of variables. When each analysis variable defines a group the latter method becomes a variable weighting method. For objects the weights are assumed to be given; for groups of variables they may be given, or estimated. These weighting schemes can also be combined and have several important applications. For example, they make it possible to perform efficient analyses of large data sets, to use the distance-based variety of nonlinear multivariate data analysis as an addition to loglinear analysis of multiway contingency tables, and to do stability studies of the solutions by applying the bootstrap on the objects or the variables in the analysis. These and other applications are discussed, and an efficient algorithm is proposed to minimize the corresponding loss function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bull, S. (1994). Analysis of attitudes toward workplace smoking restrictions. In N. Lange, L. Ryan, L. Billard, D. Brillinger, L. Conquest, & J. Greenhouse (Eds.),Case studies in biometry (pp. 249–271). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In R.N. Shepard, A.K. Romney, & S.B. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (pp. 105–155). New York and London: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J. (1988). Convergence of the majorization method for multidimensional scaling.Journal of Classification, 5, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J. & Heiser, W.J. (1980). Multidimensional scaling with restrictions on the configuration. In P.R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis, Vol. V (pp. 501–522). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J. & Meulman, J.J. (1985).Alternative approximations in principal components analysis (Research Report RR-85-13). Leiden: Leiden University, Department of Data Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife.Annals of Statistics, 7, 172–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993).An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S.E. (1985).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifi, A. (1990).Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenen, P.J.F., Commandeur, J.J.F., & Meulman, J.J. (1998). Distance analysis of large data sets of categorical variables using object weights,British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, R., & Meulman, J. J. (1992). Afstand en nabijheid: verhoudingen in de Tweede Kamer [Distance and nearness: Relations in the Second Chamber]. In J.J.A. Thomassen, M.P.C.M. van Schendelen, & M.L. Zielonka-Goei (Eds.),De geachte afgevaardigde...hoe kamerleden denken over het Nederlandse parlement. Muiderberg: Coutinho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 29, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. (1964b). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika, 29, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max, J. (1960). Quantizing for minimum distortion.Proceedings IEEE, Information theory, 6, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulman, J.J. (1986).A distance approach to nonlinear multivariate analysis. Leiden: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulman, J.J. (1992). The integration of multidimensional scaling and multivariate analysis with optimal transformations.Psychometrika, 57, 539–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulman, J.J. (1993). Points of view analysis revisited: Fitting multidimensional structures to optimal distance components with cluster restrictions on the variables.Psychometrika, 58, 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulman, J.J., & Heiser, W.J. (1983).The display of bootstrap solutions in multidimensional scaling. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Sewell, W.H., & Shah, V.P. (1968). Social class, parental encouragement, and educational aspirations.American Journal of Sociology, 73, 559–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L.R. (1960). Intra-individual and inter-individual multidimensionality. In H. Gulliksen & S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: Theory and applications (pp. 155–167). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study is funded by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) by grant nr. 030-56403 for the “PIONEER” project “Subject Oriented Multivariate Analysis” to the third author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Commandeur, J.J.F., Groenen, P.J.F. & Meulman, J.J. A distance-based variety of nonlinear multivariate data analysis, including weights for objects and variables. Psychometrika 64, 169–186 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294534

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294534

Key words

Navigation