Abstract
The study described in this article takes the view that distance education programs are dynamic systems with multiple constituencies. Literature on distance education programs as complex systems and on the critical constituency approach to program evaluation was used to guide the development of a questionnaire designed to assess the components of a distance education program. Instrument development was conducted in four phases using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The data from this study suggest that there are four major components of effectiveness in distance education programs: instruction, management, telecommuting, and support. Within each of these components there are from two to five subcomponents, 14 components in all, which can be used to assess distance education programs. The assessment scale which was developed measures these four components and their subcomponents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnard, C. I. (1938).The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Batey, A., & Cowell, R. N. (1986).Distance education: An overview. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 278-519).
Burge, E. J., & Frewin, C. C. (1985). Self-directed learning in distance learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.),The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 4515–4517). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Cameron, K. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 604–632.
Cameron, K. (1980, Autumn). Critical questions in assessing organizational effectiveness.Organizational Dynamics, 66–80.
Cameron, K. (1981). Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities.Academy of Management Journal, 24, 25–47.
Coldeway, D. O. (1988). Methodological issues in distance educational research.The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(2), 45–54.
Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J., & Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach.Academy of Management Review, 5, 211–217.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrik, XVI, 297–334.
Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.),Educational Measurement (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Dirr, P. J. (1987). Critical questions in the evaluation of distance education. In T. Gibson (Ed.),Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Teaching at a Distance: Evaluation of teaching/learning at a distance. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Press.
Eiserman, W. D., & Williams, D. D. (1987).State-wide evaluation report on productivity project studies related to improved use of technology to extended educational programs. Sub-report two: Distance education in elementary and secondary schools. A review of the literature. Logan, UT: Wasatch Institute for Research and Evaluation. (ERIC ED 291 350).
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique.Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
Gable, R. K. (1986).Instrument development in the affective domain. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Gibson, T. (Ed.) (1987).Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Teaching at a Distance: Evaluation of teaching/learning at a distance. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Hawkridge, D., & Robinson, J. (1982).Organizing educational broadcasting. London, UK: Croom Helm.
Holmberg, B. (1987). The development of distance education research.The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(3), 16–23.
Keeley, M. (1978). A social-justice approach to organizational evaluation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 272–292.
McCleary, I. V., & Egan, M. W. (1989). Program design and evaluation: Two-way interactive television.The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(1), 50–60.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (1980).Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (1986).Utilization-focused evaluation (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Saba, F., & Twitchell, D. (1988). Research in distance education: A system modeling approach.The American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 9–24.
U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1989).Linking for learning: A new course for education. (OTA-SET-430). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Whyte, W. F. (1960). Interviewing in field research. In R. N. Adams & J. J. Preiss (Eds.),Human organization research: Field relations and techniques. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harrison, P.J., Saba, F., Seeman, B.J. et al. Development of a distance education assessment instrument. ETR&D 39, 65–77 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296572
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296572