Skip to main content
Log in

A taxonomy of latent structure assumptions for probability matrix decomposition models

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A taxonomy of latent structure assumptions (LSAs) for probability matrix decomposition (PMD) models is proposed which includes the original PMD model (Maris, De Boeck, & Van Mechelen, 1996) as well as a three-way extension of the multiple classification latent class model (Maris, 1999). It is shown that PMD models involving different LSAs are actually restricted latent class models with latent variables that depend on some external variables. For parameter estimation a combined approach is proposed that uses both a mode-finding algorithm (EM) and a sampling-based approach (Gibbs sampling). A simulation study is conducted to investigate the extent to which information criteria, specific model checks, and checks for global goodness of fit may help to specify the basic assumptions of the different PMD models. Finally, an application is described with models involving different latent structure assumptions for data on hostile behavior in frustrating situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B.N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.),Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 271–281). Budapest: Academiai Kiado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. (2000). P-values for composite null models.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 1127–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candel, M. J. J. M., & Maris, E. (1997). Perceptual analysis of two-way two-mode frequency data: Probability matrix decomposition and two alternatives.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, B.P., & Louis, T.A. (1996).Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celeux, G., Hurn, M., & Robert, C. P. (2000). Computational and inferential difficulties with mixture posterior distributions.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, K., & Carlin, B. P. (1996). Markov Chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative review.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 883–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N.A.C., & Read, T.R.C. (1984). Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,46, 440–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boeck, P. (1997). Feature-based classification models with a dominance rule. InProceedings of the Biennial Sessions of the Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute (42nd Session, Book 2, pp. 389–392). Istanbul: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bonis, M., De Boeck, P., Pérez-Diaz, F., & Nahas, M. (1999). A two-process theory of facial perception of emotions.Life Sciences, 322, 669–675.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B, & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993).An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapmann & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N.S., & Hunt, J.M. (1968). S-R inventories of hostility and comparisons of the proportions of variance from persons, behaviors, and situations for hostility and anxiousness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 309–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Formann, A.K. (1992). Linear logistic latent class analysis for polytomous data.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 476–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A.E., & Smith, A.F.M. (1990). Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Rubin, D.B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.Statistical Science, 7, 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., & Rubin, D.B. (1995).Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Meng, X.M., & Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies.Statistica Sinica, 4, 733–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models.Biometrika, 61, 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models.Psychometrika, 64, 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maris, E., De Boeck, P., & Van Mechelen, I. (1996). Probability matrix decomposition models.Psychometrika, 61, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G.J., & Basford, K.E. (1988).Mixture models. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X.L. (1994). Posterior predictive p-values.The Annals of Statistics, 22, 1142–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulders, M. (2000).Probabilistic feature models for psychological frequency data: A Bayesian approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulders, M, De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I. (2001). Probability matrix decomposition models and main-effects generalized linear models for the analysis of replicated binary associations.Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 38, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meulders, M., De Boeck, P., & Van Mechelen, I. (2002). Rater classification on the basis of latent features in responding to situations. In W. Gaul & G. Ritter (Eds.),Classification, automation, and new media. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, University of Passau (pp. 453–461). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulders, M., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Gelman, A. (2000)Hierarchical extensions of probability matrix decomposition models. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Meulders, M., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I., Gelman, A., & Maris, E. (2001). Bayesian inference with probability matrix decomposition models.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 153–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A.E. (1986). A note on Bayes factors for log-linear contingency table models with vague prior information.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,48, 249–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins J.M., Van Der Vaart, A., & Ventura, V. (2000). Asymptotic distribution of p-values in composite null models.Journal of the Statistical Association, 95, 1143–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1984). Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician.Annals of Statistics, 12, 1151–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model.Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., & Carlin, B.P. (1998).Bayesian deviance, the effective number of parameters, and the comparison of arbitrarily complex models. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Gilks, W.R. (1995).BUGS: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling, Version 0.50 (Tech. Rep.). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University, Institute of Public Health, Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, M. (2000). Dealing with label switching in mixture models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,62, 795–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M.A., & Wong, W.H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansteelandt, K. (1999). A formal model for the competency-demand hypothesis.European Journal of Personality, 13, 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt J.K. (1997).Log-linear models for event histories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Davier, M. (1997). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse categorical data: Results of a Monte Carlo study.Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2, 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Meulders.

Additional information

Note: The research reported in this paper was partially supported by the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (Belgium) (project G.0207.97 awarded to Paul De Boeck and Iven Van Mechelen), and the Research Fund of K.U. Leuven (F/96/6 fellowship to Andrew Gelman, OT/96/10 project awarded to Iven Van Mechelen and GOA/2000/02 awarded to Paul De Boeck and Iven Van Mechelen). We thank Marcel Croon and Kristof Vansteelandt for commenting on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meulders, M., De Boeck, P. & Van Mechelen, I. A taxonomy of latent structure assumptions for probability matrix decomposition models. Psychometrika 68, 61–77 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296653

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296653

Key words

Navigation