Skip to main content
Log in

Designing and instructional design

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What do we know about the process of designing instruction? We have a large body of literature and numerous prescriptive models, yet it is not clear that designers actually operate as the literature and models suggest. Other design fields, such as architecture and engineering, have similar concerns, but have acted upon those concerns by systematically investigating design processes. Considering the results of such studies may prove beneficial to instructional designers in terms of promoting critical analysis of processes and decisions and identifying questions and hypotheses for research. In this article, results from numerous studies of design are synthesized to provide a basis for considering instructional design as a type of designing rather than an isolated phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akin, O. (1978). How do architects design? In Latombe (Ed.),Artificial intelligence and pattern recognition in computer-aided design (pp. 65–103). North-Holland Publishing Company.

  • Allen, C. (1988).Situated designing. Unpublished master's thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1976).Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1987). Instructional systems design. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.).Instructional technology: Foundations (pp.85–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1991).Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1991). Theory into practice: How do we link? In G. J. Anglin (Ed.),Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 88–101). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. (1990). An overview of minimalist instruction.Proceedings: 23rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-23), January 2–6, 1990. IEEE Computer Society.

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968).The systems approach. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing.Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990).The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, T. (1987).The art and craft of course design. New York: Nichols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, C. M. (1972). On the analysis of intuitive design processes. In G. T. Moore (Ed.),Emerging methods in environmental design and planning (pp. 21–37). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foz, A. T. K. (1973). Observations on designer behavior.DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods, 7(4), 320–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayeski, D. M. (1991). Software tools for empowering instructional developers.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(2), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. A. (1966). Design and the design method. In S. A. Gregory (Ed.),The design method. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1987).The complete problem solver. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Originally published in 1981 by The Franklin Institute, Philadelphia)

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, N., & Igoe, A. (1989). An analysis of intuitive and model-directed media-selection decisions.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(4), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. E., Radcliffe, D. F., & Schoorl, D. (1985). Design or problem solving: A critical choice for the engineering profession.Design Studies, 6(2), 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V., & Eder, W. E. (1987). A scientific approach to engineering design.Design Studies, 8(3), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C. (1970).Design methods: Seeds of human futures. London: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C. (1979). Designing designing.Design Studies, 1(1), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. T. (1983). Inside the black box: Making design decisions for instruction.British Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, D. A. (1985).Design basics (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (1980).How designers think. Westfield, NJ: Eastview Editions.

  • Lera, S. (1983). Synopses of some recent published studies of the design process and designer behaviour.Design Studies, 4(2), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T., & Bjorkquist, D. C. (1992). Needs assessment: A critical reappraisel.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(4), 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzadder, W. J. (1986).Fundamentals of engineering drawing (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P.(Producer), & Kifer, V. (Producer/Director). (1989).The art and vision of James Hubbell [Video]. San Diego: WKPBS-TV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. L. (1984). Internalizing instructional design.Educational Technology, 24(5), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadin, M., & Novak, M. (1987). MIND: A design machine. In P. J. W. ten Hagen & T. Tomiyama (Eds.),Intelligent CAD systems I (pp. 146–171). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, W. A. (1988).Selection and utilization of problem information by instructional designers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1984).Engineering design. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Originally published in German, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P. L., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). The problem space of instructional design. In J. Psotka, L. D. Massey, & S. A. Mutter (Eds.),Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 181–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983).Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (1987). Instructional technology: A history. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 11–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, R. R. (1965).Cognition and thought: An information processing approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. (1986).The theoretical and conceptual basis of instructional design. New York: Nichols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinderle, J. R. (1986). Function, form, fabrication relations and decomposition strategies in design.Proceedings ASME Computers in Engineering Conference, July 1986, Chicago.

  • Robinson, J. W. (1986). Design as exploration.Design Studies, 7(2), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think and act. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1981).The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streibel, M. J. (1991). Instructional plans and situated learning: The challenge of Suchman's theory of situated action for instructional designers and instructional systems. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.),Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 117–132). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987).Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. C., & Carroll, J. M. (1979). The psychological study of design.Design Studies, 1(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, S. D. (1991, February).Two theories of design and instructional design. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AECT, Orlando, FL.

  • Ullman, D. G., Stauffer, L. A., & Dietterich, T. G. (1987, February).Preliminary results of an experimental study of the mechanical design process. Paper presented at the NSF Workshop on Design Theory and Methodology, Oakland, CA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowland, G. Designing and instructional design. ETR&D 41, 79–91 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297094

Keywords

Navigation