Skip to main content
Log in

Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This study focused on efforts in four colleges of education deemed exemplary in their approaches to prepare preservice teachers to use technology. The study addressed one over-arching question: What are the important pieces of the puzzle that make up the current technology integration efforts at these exemplary sites? Data were gathered during the 1997–98 academic year. Findings suggest that there is a web of enabling factors that supports student learning opportunities and desired technology-related outcomes for preservice teachers. The informed leadership of deans and other administrative and faculty leaders appears to be especially critical to sustain and expand technology-integration efforts. Leadership issues, along with a wide range of other factors, are systematically examined across the four case studies. The authors conclude that while each of the four cases is unique, many of the recommended practices explored in this study would likely prove beneficial if employed in other settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bull, G., Hochella, J., Becker, F., Miles, H., & Tate, M. (1995).An integrated preservice and inservice technology program for teacher education. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia.

  • CEO Forum School Technology and Readiness Report: Year 2. (1999). [Online]. Available: http://www.ceoforum.org/reports/REPORT99/INDEX.HTML

  • Cooper, J. (March, 1999).Lead, follow, or get out of the way: Building information technology in teacher education in colleges of education. Keynote panel at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.

  • Curry School of Education. (Fall, 1997). The Curry School Technology Strand. Submission to the AACTE Task Force on Technology Innovative Use of Technology Award Program.

  • Fullan, M. (1991).The new meaning of educational change (rev. ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1998). Leadership for the 21st century: Breaking the bonds of dependency.Educational Leadership.55(7), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (1996).ISTE recommended foundations in technology for all teachers. Eugene, OR: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewallen, G. (1998).Report on the ASU West College of Education Technology Survey. [Online]. Available: http://coe.west.asu.edu/survey/.

  • Mergendoller, J., Johnston, J., Rockman, S., & Willis, J. (1994).Exemplary approaches to training teachers to use technology. Volume 1: Case Studies. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment: Washington, DC and Beryl Buck Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., Saxl, E., & Lieberman, A. (1988). What skills do educational “change agents” need? An empirical view.Curriculum Inquiry 18(2), 157–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moursund & Bielefeldt (1999).Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Milken Exchange on Education Technology: Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1997).Technology and the New Professional Teacher: Preparing for the 21st Century Classroom. Washington, DC: NCATE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, R.V. (1993). HyperQual2 Version 1.2 [Computer Program]. Chandler, AZ: Author. (Address: 3327 N. Dakota, Chandler, AZ 85224 U.S.A.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J., & Altman, J. (1997). Information technology and teacher preparation: Some critical issues and illustrative solutions.Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 89–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995).Diffusion of innovations, 4th edition. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1987).Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995).Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, K. (1993). Teacher educator's uses of computers in teaching.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 1(4), 335–352 andTeacher Education, 1(4), 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams Glaser, C. (1998).Creating new standards for higher education: Effecting pedagogical change in the undergraduate curriculum through the integration of technology. Dissertation. Vanderbilt University. December 10, 1998.

  • Zehr, M. (1997). Teaching the teachers.Education Week. [Online] Available: http://www.edweek.org/sreports/tc/misc/tctoc.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strudler, N., Wetzel, K. Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. ETR&D 47, 63–81 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299598

Keywords

Navigation