Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived justice of ecological policy and proenvironmental commitments

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model was outlined (i) to explain readiness to proenvironmental commitments and decisions in everyday life by six categories of predictor variables, including justice appraisals of pollution control, basic rights, appraisals of pollution, of pollution causation, of the efficacy of pollution control measures, and of ecological responsibility, and (ii) to generate hypotheses on the relationships between the predictor variables. Model variables were assessed by a questionnaire study (N=518) referring to the problem of air pollution. Proenvironmental commitments and decisions could be well predicted by morally relevant appraisals, especially by justice appraisals (e.g., approving proenvirommental laws, taxes, and subsidies, rejecting the justice of the current environmental policy and of mere appeals), whereas predictors representing self-protective motivations remained insignificant. Justice appraisals are in line with the “causation principle of justice”: Those who caused the pollution are made responsible for its reduction and should pay the costs for the pollution control. Results demonstrate that justice appraisals are essential determinants of people's ecologically relevant emotions, cognitions, and engagements. Moreover, they reveal that the responsibility for pollution control is not left with state and economy but is also regarded as a matter that concerns the citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Some unresolved issues.Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Process. 50: 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelang, M., Tepe, K., Vagt, G., and Wendt, W. (1977). Mitteilung über einige Schritte der Entwicklung einer Skala zum Umweltbewusein.Diagnostica 23: 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., and Schmidt, P. (1993). Verkehrsmittelwahl — eine Anwendung der Theorie geplantes Verhalten.Z. Sozialpsychol. 24: 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, A. (1994). Ermittlung des ökologischen Problembewußtseins der Bevölkerung. (Forschungsbericht des Umweltbundesamts: 101 07 104 UBA-FB 93-137), Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference of European Statisticians (ed.). (1987).Environment Statistics in Europe and North America: An Experimental Compendium, United Nations Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 24: 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnay, A. J. (ed.). (1992).Statistical Record of the Environment, Gale Research Company, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1985). Controversial issues in emotion theory. In Shaver, P. (ed.).Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 64–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, A. M., and Spada, H. (1993). Bis zum bitteren Ende? In Schahn, J., and Giesinger, T. (eds.),Psychologie für den Umweltschutz, Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons.Science 162: 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, J. R., and Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior. Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program.Environ. and Behav. 23: 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, W. A. (1994). Characteristics of environmental ethics: Environmental activists' accounts.Ethics and Behavior 4: 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, C. F., Levitt, L., and Loomis, R. J. (1978). Perceptions of energy crisis. Who is blamed and how do citizens react to environment-lifestyle trade-offs?Environ. Behav. 10: 37–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach. (1988). In welchen Zustand ist unsere Umwelt? Negativmeldungen vor allem aus großen Städten.Plan. Anal. 13: 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E. (1993). Ökologisch relevante Verbotsforderungen, Engagement- und Verzichtbereitschaften am Beispiel der Luftqualität. Dissertation, Universität Trier, Fb I-Psychologie, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E. (1994). Straßenverkehr und Umweltschutz: Die Ökologische Verantwortung des Bürgers. In Flade, A. (ed.),Mobilitätsverhalten, Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., and Montada, L. (1994). Umweltschutz und die Verantwortung der Bürger.Z. Sozialpsychol. 25: 326–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzev, R. D., and Pardini, A. U. (1987–1988). The comparative effectiveness of reward and commitment approaches in motivating community recycling.J. Environ. Syst. 17: 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, H., and Tischler, W. (1984).Umweltbewußtsein, Ökologische Wertvorstellungen westlicher Industrienationen, Edition Sigma Bohn Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kley, J., and Fietkau, H.-J. (1979). Verhaltenswirksame Variablen des Umweltbewußtseins.Psychol. Praxis 1: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushler, M. G. (1989). Use of evaluation to improve energy conservation programs: A review and case study.J. Soc. Issues 45: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Kanner, A. D., and Folkman, S. (1980). Emotions: A cognitive phenomenological analysis. In Plutchik, R., and Kellerman, H. (eds.),Emotion, Theory, Research, and Experience. Theories of Emotion, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 189–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lück, H. E., and Timaeus, E. (1969). Skalen zur Messung Manifester Angst (MAS) und Sozialer Wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM).Diagnostica 15: 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. E., and Zanna, M. P. (1990). Commitment in the face of adversity: A value-affirmation approach.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58: 1040–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynne, H. E., and Rola, L. R. (1988). Improving attitude-behavior prediction models with economic variables: Farmer actions toward soil conservation.J. Soc. Psychol. 128: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, M. P., and Ward, M. P. (1973). Ecology: Let's hear from the people. An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge.Am. Psychol. 28: 583–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., and Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reaction to the disadvantaged.Soc. Justice Res. 3: 313–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, State and Utopie, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. (1973). Social traps.Am. Psychol. 28: 641–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rat von Sachverständingen für Umweltfragen. (ed.). (1978).Umweltgutachten, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen. (ed.). (1987).Umweltgutachten, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schahn, J., and Holzer, E. (1990). Konstruktion, Validierung und Anwendung von Skalen zur Erfassung des individuellen Umweltbewußtseins.Z. Diff. Diagnos. Psychol. 11: 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Moral decision making and behavior. In Macaulay, J., and Berkowitz, L. (eds.).Altruism and Helping Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitter, B. (1987). Wie läßt sich Ökologische Gerechtigkeit denken?Z. Ökolog. Ethik 31: 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaccarelli, S., Zolik, E., and Jason, L. A. (1989–1990). Effects of verbal prompting and block characteristics on participation in curbside newspaper recycling.J. Environ. Syst. 19: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spada, H., and Opwis, K. (1985). Ökologisches Handeln im Konflikt: Die Allmende-Klemme. In Day, P., Fuhrer, U., and Laucken, U. (eds.),Umwelt und Handeln, Attempto, Tübingen, Germany, pp. 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., and Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern.Environ. Behav. 25: 322–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., and Gardener, G. T. (1981). The place of behavior change in the management of environmental problems.Z. Umweltpolitik 2: 213–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamt. (ed.). (1994).Daten zur Umwelt 1992–1993, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montada, L., Kals, E. Perceived justice of ecological policy and proenvironmental commitments. Soc Just Res 8, 305–327 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334710

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334710

Key Words

Navigation