Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic delegation under quality competition

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines strategic manipulations of incentive contracts in a model where firms compete in quality as well as in price. Compensation schemes for managers are based on a linear combination of profits and sales. For a given level of quality, a firm desires to reduce the manager's compensation when product sales increase; this serves as the firm's commitment to raise prices. Nevertheless, in general, a manager has a stronger incentive to produce goods of higher quality if he is compensated according to sales. Therefore, a compensation scheme that penalizes a manager when sales increase may result in products that are inferior to those of its rival. We show that, depending on the nature of quality, a positive weight on sales may be desirable when firms compete in quality and price. Welfare implications are also explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dixit, A. (1979): “Quality and Quantity Competition.”Review of Economic Studies 46: 587–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C. (1985): “Managerial Incentives as a Strategic Variable in Duopolistic Environment.”International Journal of Industrial Organization 3: 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C., and Judd, K. L. (1987): “Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly.”American Economic Review 77: 927–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C., Judd, K. L., and Kalai, E. (1991): “Observable Contracts: Strategic Delegation and Cooperation.”International Economic Review 32: 551–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B., and Milgrom, P. (1991): “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design.”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 26–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi, K. (1998): “Agency Contracts and Oligopolistic Competition.” Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University.

  • Katz, M. L. (1991): “Game-Playing Agents: Unobservable Contracts as Precommitments.”Rand Journal of Economics 22: 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, C.-t. A., and Burgess, J. F., Jr. (1993): “Quality Competition, Welfare, and Regulation.”Journal of Economics/Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 58: 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklivas, S. D. (1987): “The Strategic Choice of Managerial Incentives.”Rand Journal of Economics 18: 452–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. M. (1975): “Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economics 6: 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. (1985): “Delegation and the Theory of the Firm.”Economic Journal, Suppl. 95: 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishibashi, K. Strategic delegation under quality competition. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 73, 25–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02339580

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02339580

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation