Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of training in concept mapping on student achievement in traditional classroom tests

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Due to the small numbers, this study should be viewed as an illuminative pilot study. The main points arising are:

  1. .

    Students who did not achieve a high level of concept mapping mastery showed no significant improvement in performance on normal classroom end-of-unit achievement tests.

  2. .

    over half of the students who achieved a high level of concept mapping mastery also showed a significant improvement in performance on normal classroom end-of-unit achievement tests, and,

  3. .

    concept mapping should be incorporated into the ongoing classroom instruction patterns if performance gains are to be maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • NOVAK, J.D. (1981),The Use of Concept Mapping and Gowin's “V” Mapping. Instructional Strategies in Junior High School Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • TISHER, R.P., POWER, C.N. & ENDEAN, L. (1972),Fundamental Issues in Science Education. Wiley and Sons, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fraser, K., Edwards, J. The effects of training in concept mapping on student achievement in traditional classroom tests. Research in Science Education 15, 158–165 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356538

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356538

Keywords

Navigation