Skip to main content
Log in

Action research through stimulated recall

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emphasis in classroom learning research has moved from process-product models to the mediating process paradigm. The stimulated-recall interview and thik aloud techniques are the two main processes that have been used in attempts to find out what goes on inside students' heads while they are learning. For example, this researcher has used the stimulated-recall interview technique to identify the workplace thinking of a marine science researcher, and the in-class thinking of a year eleven biology student. Such studies as these have produced findings with important implications for the classroom teacher in the role of action researcher. This paper describes how to conduct stimulated-recall interviews and discusses some classroom implications from the two studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, J. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study.European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated-recall: A method for research on teaching.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. & Peterson, P.L. (1976). Teacher stimulated-recall on interactive decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Costa, A.L. (1991). Teaching for, of, and about thinking. In A. L. Costa (ed.).Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (Rev. ed., Volume 1). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A.L. (1992). The school as a home for the mind. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Thinking, Townsville, Australia.

  • Edwards, J. (1991). The direct teaching of thinking skills. In G. Evans, (ed.)Learning and teaching cognitive skills. Melbourne: A.C.E.R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1982). Student thinking in a secondary biology classroom.Research in Science Education, 12, 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1984a). A comparison of student thinking in a mathematics and a science classroom.Research in Science Education, 14, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1984b). What are students really thinking?Educational Leadership, 42(3), 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1982).Art, mind and brain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991).The unschooled mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, B. (Ed.) (1955).The creative process. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R.F. & White, R.T. (1980). A matter of gravity.Research in Science Education, 10, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. (1975).Human brain and human learning. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D.R., Goldberg, A.D. & Campbell, R. (1967).Studies in human interaction: Interpersonal process recall stimulated by videotape, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, P.W. (1984). Stimulated-recall from video: Its use in research on the thought processes of classroom participants. In O. Zuber-Skerrit, (ed.)Video in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, P.W. & Edwards, J. (1986). Students' in-class thinking.Instructional Science, 15, 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. & Marland, P.W. (1989). Research on teacher thinking: the next phase.Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(2), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morine, G. & Vallance, E. (1975).Beginning teacher evaluation study. Special study B: A study of teacher and pupil perceptions of classroom interaction. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, M. (1992). The study of metacognition in solving arithmetic word problems.Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology.40(1), 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1992).Smart schools-From training memories to educating minds. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer, M. & Adey, P. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 267–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J.P. (1979).The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. & Gallagher, J.J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms?Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 549–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. (1989).Learning from experience: Principles and practice in action-research. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: secondary science teacher education, classroom thinking during instruction, direct teaching of thinking skills.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Brien, J. Action research through stimulated recall. Research in Science Education 23, 214–221 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357063

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357063

Keywords

Navigation