Skip to main content
Log in

Imbalanced biphasic electrical stimulation: Muscle tissue damage

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of imbalanced biphasic stimulation were studied on cat skeletal muscle to determine if greater charge densities can be safely used than with balanced or monophasic stimulation. The results of the study indicate that imbalanced biphasic stimulation can be tolerated safely by tissue at or below a net dc current density of 35 μA/mm2 and not safely tolerated at or above a net dc current of 50 μA/mm2. Monophasic stimulation has been shown to be safe at or below net dc current levels of 10 μA/mm2 and in these studies we found it was not safe at or above net dc current levels of 20 μA/mm2. Stimuli were applied to muscles via coiled wire intramuscular electrodes using a regulated current source. Since the safe average current density was higher for imbalanced biphasic stimulation than for monophasic stimulation, this suggests that: (a) pH change is not the primary reaction causing tissue damage and (b) the damaging electrochemical process that takes place during a cathodic stimulation pulse can be reversed by an anodic pulse having substantially less charge than its companion cathodic pulse. We conclude that greater cathodic charge densities can be safely employed with imbalanced biphasic stimulation than with either monophasic stimulation or balanced charge biphasic stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck, T.R.; Ruggeri, R.T.; Ballestrasse, C.L. Calculations of temperature rise produced in body tissue by a spherical electrode. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 13:177–194; 1985.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Box, G.E.P.; Hunter, W.G.; Hunter, J.S. Statistics for experimenters — an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brummer, S.B.; Robblee, L.S.; Hambrecht, F.T. Criteria for selecting electrodes for electrical stimulation: Theoretical and practical considerations. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 405:159–171; 1983.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caldwell, C.W.; Reswick, J.B. A percutaneous wire electrode for chronic research use. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 22:429–432; 1975.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferguson, G.A. Statistical analysis in psychology & education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976: p. 295.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jones, L.J.; Proskauer, C.C.; Paull, W.K.; Lepeschkin, E.; Jones, R.E. Ultrastructural injury to chick myocardial cells in vitro following “electric countershock”. Circ Res. 46:387–394; 1980.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, J.L.; Jones, R.E. Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. Am. J. Phys. H792–H796; 1986.

  8. Mchardy,; Geller, J.D.; Brummer, S.B. An approach to corrosion control during electrical stimulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 5:155–149; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mortimer, J.T.; Kaufmann, D.; Roessmann, U. Intramuscular electrical stimulation: tissue damage. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 8:235–244; 1980.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Contract Proposal #NIH-NINCDS-87-01, Electrodes for neuromuscular stimulation. Applied Neural Control Lab., Case Western Reserve University, July 1, 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the Veterans Administration, Grant No. V541P-3141 and the National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, Neural Prosthesis Program, Contract No. NOI-NS-4-2362.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheiner, A., Mortimer, J.T. & Roessmann, U. Imbalanced biphasic electrical stimulation: Muscle tissue damage. Ann Biomed Eng 18, 407–425 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02364157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02364157

Keywords

Navigation