Skip to main content
Log in

A fluorimetric method for measuring the activity of soil enzymes

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A fluorimetric method is described for the measurement of the activity of a range of soil enzymes. The method is based on the measurement of 4-methylumbelliferone (MUB), a fluorescent product liberated on hydrolysis of the enzyme substrate. The main advantage of the method over colorimetric techniques is that separation of MUB from the soil is unnecessary and the method is therefore suitable for routine, automated analyses. The method was used to measure the activity of β-cellobiase, β-galactosaminidase, β-glucosidase and β-xylosidase over a wide range of substrate concentration and in a range of soils. Kinetic parameters are reported for these enzymes. The method was also shown to be suitable for the assay of arylsulphatase and acid and alkaline phosphatase in soil. The technique should be applicable to a wide range of soil hydrolases, using the same assay methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burns R G 1978 Enzyme activity in soil: Some theoretical and practical considerationsIn Soil Enzymes. Ed R G Burns, pp 295–326 Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cornish-Bowden A 1976 Principles of Enzyme Kinetics. Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frankenberger W T and Dick W A 1983 Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 945–951.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayano K and Katami A 1977 Extraction of β-glucosidase activity from pea field soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9, 349–351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayano K and Shiojima M 1974 Estimation of β-glucosidase activity in soil. 10th Int. Congr. Soil Sci. 3, 136–142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hershman L E and Temple K L 1979 Comparison of ATP, phosphatase, pectinolase, and respiration as indicators of microbial activity in reclaimed coal strip mine spoils. Soil Sci. 127 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hutterman A, Fedderau-Himme B and Rossenplanter K 1983 Biochemical reactivity in forest soils as indicators for environmental pollution.In: Effects of Accumulation of Air Pollutants in Forest Ecosystem. Eds. B Ulrich and J Pankrath pp 257–270. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Netherland.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jarvis M G 1969 Terrain and soil in North Berkshire. Geogr. J. 135 398–401.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leaback D H 1974 An Introduction to the Fluorimetric Estimation of Enzyme Activities. 2nd Ed. Koch-Lighy Lab. Ltd., Slough.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lethbridge G, Bull A T and Burns R G 1978 Assay and properties of 1, 3-β-glucanase in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 389–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rachhpal-Singh and Nye P H 1984 Diffusion of urea, ammonium and soil alkalinity from surface applied urea. J. Soil Sci. 35, 529–538.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sparling G P, Ord B G and Vaughan D 1981 Microbial biomass and activity in soils amended with glucose. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13, 99–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Speir T W 1984 Urease, phosphatase and sulphatase activities of Cook Island and Tongan soils. N.Z.J. of Sci. 27, 73–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomescu E 1966 L'influence du pH sur l'activite de la cellobiase du soil. Symp. Soil Biol. Cluj, 101–104.

  15. Zhou L K, Zhang Z M and Cao C M 1983 On the role of total soil enzyme activities in the evaluation of soil fertility. Acta Ped. Sinica 20, 413–418.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darrah, P.R., Harris, P.J. A fluorimetric method for measuring the activity of soil enzymes. Plant Soil 92, 81–88 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372269

Key words

Navigation