Abstract
This article draws upon findings from an ethnographic study of two towns in rural Iowa to examine the adequacy of the insider/outsider distinction as a guideline for evaluating and conducting ethnographic research. Utilizing feminist standpoint and materialist feminist theories, I start with the assumption that, rather than one “insider” or “outsider” position, we all begin our work with different relationships to shifting aspects of social life and to particular knowers in the community and this contributes to numerous dimensions through which we can relate to residents in various communities. “Outsiderness” and “insiderness” are not fixed or static positions, rather they are ever-shifting and permeable social locations illustrated in this case study by the “outsider phenomenon.” Community processes that reorganize and resituate race-ethnicity, gender and class relations form some of the most salient aspects of the “outsider phenomenon.” These dynamic processes shaped our relationships with residents as ethnographic identities were repositioned by shifts in constructions of “community” that accompanied ongoing social, demographic, and political changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker, J., K. Barry, and J. Esseveld. (1991). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In M. M. Fonow and J. A. Cook (Eds.),Beyond methodology (pp. 133–153). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Adams, J. (1992). 1870s agrarian activism in Southern Illinois: Mediator between two eras.Social Science History 16(3):365–400.
Adler, P. A. and P. Adler. (1987).Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Aguilar, J. L. (1981). Insider research: An ethnography of a debate. In D. A. Messerschmidt (Ed.),Anthropologists at home in North America (pp. 133–149). London: Cambridge University Press.
Bar On, B. (1993). Marginality and epistemic privilege. In L. Alcoff and E. Potter (Eds.),Feminist epistemologies (pp. 83–100). New York: Routledge.
Barrett, M. (1980).Women's oppression today. London: Verso.
Becker, H. A. (1963).Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
Collins, P. Hill. (1990).Black feminist thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Collins, P. Hill. (1991). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. In M. M. Fonow and J. A. Cook (Eds.),Beyond methodology (pp. 35–59). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
DuBois, W. E. B. (1989/1903).Souls of Black folk. New York: Bantam Books.
Eisenstein, Z. R. (Ed.). (1979).Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Elden, M. and Levin, M. (1991). Cogenerative learning: Bringing participation into action research.” In W. Foote Whyte (Ed.),Participatory Action Research (pp. 127–42). New York: Sage.
Ellis, C. (1991). Sociological introspection and emotional experience.Symbolic Interaction 14(1):23–50.
Ellis, C. (1995). Emotional and ethical quagmires in returning to the field.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 23(1):68–98.
Fine, G. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(3):267–294.
Fink, D. (1992).Agrarian women: Wives and mothers in rural Nebraska 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Fitchen, J. M. (1991).Endangered spaces, enduring places: Change, identity and survival in rural America. Boulder: Westview Press.
Foucault, M. (1972).The archeology of knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
Frankenberg, R. (1993).White women, race matters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hale, S. (1991). Feminist method, process, and self-criticism: Interviewing Sudanese women. In S. Berger Gluck and D. Patai (Eds.),Women's Words (pp. 121–136). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.
Harding, S. (1986).The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. (1991).Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hartsock, N. (1983).Money, sex and power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Hartmann, H. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Toward a more progressive union. In L. Sargent (Ed.),Women and revolution (pp. 1–41), Boston: South End Press.
Hawkesworth, M. E. (1989). Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth.Signs 14(3):533–57.
Hennessy, R. (1993).Materialist feminism and the politics of discourse. NY: Routledge.
Horowitz, R. (1986). Remaining an outsider: membership as a threat to research rapport.Urban Life 1986:409–430.
Hyde, C. (1995). The meaning of whiteness.Qualitative Sociology 18(1):87–95.
Joseph, G. (1981). The incompatible menage a trois: Marxism, feminism, and racism. In L. Sargent (Ed.),Women and revolution (pp. 91–108). Boston: South End Press.
Johnson, J. M. (1983). Trust and personal involvements in fieldwork. In R. M. Emerson (ed.),Contemporary Field Research. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press.
Kleinman, S., and M. Copp. (1990).Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kreiger, S. (1991).Social science and the self. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Landry, D., and G. MacLean. (1993).Materialist feminisms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Light, L., and N. Kleiber. (1988). Interactive research in a feminist setting: The Vancouver Women's Health Collective. In D. A. Messerschmidt (Ed.),Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One's Own Society (pp. 185–201). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lorber, J. (1994).Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lugones, M. C., and E. V. Spelman. (1983). Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism and the demand for “the women's voice.”Women's Studies International Forum 6: 573–581.
Maguire, P. (1987).Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst, MA: The Center for International Education.
Merton, R. K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge.American Journal of Sociology (Vol. 77):8–47.
Messerschmidt, D. A. (Ed.), (1981).Anthropologists at home in North America. London: Cambridge University Press.
Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C. Talpade Mohanty, A. Russo and L. Torres (Eds.),Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (pp. 51–80). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Monney, P. H. (1986). Class relations and class structure in the Midwest. In A. E. Havens, with G. Hooks, P. H. Mooney, and M. J. Pfeffer (Eds.),Studies in the transformation of United States agriculture (pp. 206–251). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Naples, N. A. (1994a). Contested Needs: Shifting the Standpoint on Rural Economic Development. Paper presented at the Fifth Conference on Rural/Farm Women in Historical Perspective, Chevy Chase, Maryland, December 3.
Naples, N. A. (1994b). Contradictions in agrarian ideology: Restructuring gender, race-ethnicity, and class in rural Iowa.Rural Sociology 59(1):110–135.
Naples, N. A. (1994c). Widening the Lens on the State: Shifting the Standpoint to Mexican and Mexican American Migrants in the Midwest. Paper presented at Annual Workshop of Research Network on Gender, State, and Society, Social Science Historical Association, Atlanta, Georgia, October 13.
Naples, N. A. (1992). Activist mothering: Cross-generational continuity in the community work of women from low income communities.Gender & Society 6(3): 441–463.
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.)Doing Feminist Research (pp. 30–61). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Omi, M., and H. Winant. (1986).Racial formation in the United States from the 1960s to the 1980s. New York: Routledge.
Pollner, M., and R. M. Emerson. (1983). The dynamics of inclusion and distance in fieldwork relations. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.),Contemporary field research (pp. 235–252). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Ramazanoglu, C. (1993). Introduction. In C. Ramazanoglu (Ed.),Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and Feminism (pp. 1–25). New York: Routledge.
Reinharz, S. (1992).Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford.
Riessman, C, Kohler. (1987). When gender is not enough: Women interviewing women.Gender & Society 1(2): 172–207.
Sandoval, C. (1991). U.S. Third World feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world.Genders 10: 1–24.
Simmel, G. (1921). The sociological significance of the ‘stranger’. In R. E. Park and E. W. Burgess, (Eds.),Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, C. D., and Kornblum, W. (Eds.). (1989).In the field. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Smith, D. E. (1987).The everyday world as problematic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. E. (1990).Conceptual practices of power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Smith, D. E. (1992). Sociology from women's experience: A reaffirmation.Sociological Theory 10(1):88–98.
Smith, D. E. (1993). High noon in textland: A critique of Clough.The Sociological Quarterly 34(1):183–192.
Spivak, G. C. (1987).In other worlds. New York: Methuen.
Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women's Studies International Forum 11(1):21–27.
Stern, S. (1994). Social science from below: Grassroots knowledge for science and emancipation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.
Williams, A. (1990). Reading feminism in fieldnotes. In L. Stanley (Ed.),Feminist praxis (pp. 253–261). New York: Routledge.
Wilson, J. (1974). The new black sociology: Reflections on the “insiders” and “outsiders” controversy.” In J. E. Blackwell and M. Janowitz (Eds.),Black Sociologists: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 322–338). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Winant, H. (1994).Racial conditions. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naples, N.A. A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The “outsider phenomenon” in rural Iowa. Qual Sociol 19, 83–106 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393249
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393249