Skip to main content
Log in

Mitigating the tyranny of public opinion: Anonymous discourse and the ethic of sincerity

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public opinion breeds tyranny by forcing individuals to refrain from voicing their genuine thoughts and feelings. The means used to mitigate such tyranny include the separation of governmental powers, the ethic of tolerance, and the secret ballot. Yet neither individually nor collectively do these devices prevent the emergence and persistence of social taboos. This paper proposes two additional corrective devices. One is an electronic instrument that would enable public officials to deliberate on socially sensitive matters behind a veil of anonymity. The other is an ethic that would enhance the utility citizens derive from truthfulness on political matters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan (1985)The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975)The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. (1991)Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1971) “Internal Processes Governing Party Positions in Elections.”Public Choice 11: 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990)Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, H. G. (1960 [1949])Confucius and the Chinese Way. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1956)A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957)An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Souza, D. (1991)Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsall, T. B. and M. D. Edsall (1991)Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J. S. (1991)Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, N. (1975)Affirmative Discrimination: Ethnic Inequality and Public Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentoff, N. (1992)Free Speech for Me—But Not for Thee: How the American Left and Right Relentlessly Censor Each Other. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970)Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1929) “Stability in Competition.”Economic Journal 39: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, H. (1989) “Havel Makes It Official: He'd Accept Top Billing.”New York Times, December 8: A17.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1976)Toleration. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1987) “Preference Falsification, Policy Continuity and Collective Conservatism.”Economic Journal 97: 642–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1990) “Private and Public Preferences.”Economics and Philosophy 6: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1991) “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.”World Politics 44: 7–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1993) “The Unthinkable and the Unthought.”Rationality and Society 5: forthcoming.

  • Loury, G. (1989) “Free at Last?” Unpublished manuscript. Harvard University.

  • McClosky, H. (1964) “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.”American Political Science Review 58: 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H. and A. Brill (1983)Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H. and J. Zaller (1984)The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. (1961 [1788]) “The Federalist No. 51.” In: J. E. Cooke (ed)The Federalist: 347–353. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1978 [1859])On Liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1919 [1861])Representative Government. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (1988) “Trends in Political Tolerance.”Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H. and A. Salomaa (1991) “A Cryptographic Approach to the Secret Ballot.”Behavioral Science 36: 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, C. Z., H. J. Crockett, Jr., and J. A. Williams, Jr. (1978)Tolerance for Nonconformity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, M. (1990) “American Politics Loses Way as Polls Displace Leadership.”New York Times, March 18: 1, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1985 [1929])The Revolt of the Masses. Translated by A. Kerrigan. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970)Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A. (1989) “Broad Disparities in Votes and Polls Raising Questions.”New York Times, November 9: A1, B14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1987)The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978)Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A. M., Jr. (1991)The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society. Knoxville, Tenn.: Whittle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950)Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd. ed. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, L. and S. Welch (1991)Black Americans' Views of Racial Inequality: The Dream Deferred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzhenitsyn, A. (1975[1974]) “The Smatterers.” In: Solzhenitsyn et al. (eds)From under the Rubble. Translated by A. M. Brock et al.: 229–278. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1984)Civil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality? New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, S. (1990)The Content of Our Character: A New Vision of Race in America. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. A. (1955)Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, F. R. (1975 [1969]) “Fifty Years of ‘Clear and Present Danger’: From Schenck to Brandenburg—and Beyond.” In: P. B. Kurland (ed)Free Speech and Association: The Supreme Court and the First Amendment: 302–341. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. (1990) “The Persistent ‘Gnat’ that Louisiana Can't Get Out of Its Face.”Los Angeles Times, October 14: M1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. P. (1990) “David Dinkins' Victory in New York City: The Decline of the Democratic Party Organization and the Strengthening of Black Politics.”PS: Political Science and Politics 23: 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de (1989 [1835])Democracy in America. 2 vols. Edited by H. Reeve, F. Bowen, and P. Bradley. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de (1955 [1856])The Old Régime and the French Revolution. Translated by S. Gilbert. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987)The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.A1074010 00004 CS-SPJRNPDF [HEADSUP]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A draft of this paper was discussed at a Liberty Fund Conference on the “Ethical Foundations of Constitutional Order,” held in Arlington, VA, on July 9–12, 1992. Many of the conference participants offered frank criticisms that resulted in improvements. Jerry Harvey read the paper with exemplary care, making no effort to hide his reservations; I benefited greatly from his wise comments. I profited also from two reports commissioned by this journal, both anonymous.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuran, T. Mitigating the tyranny of public opinion: Anonymous discourse and the ethic of sincerity. Constit Polit Econ 4, 41–78 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393282

Keywords

Navigation