Skip to main content
Log in

Trends and issues in land and water resources management: Setting the agenda for change

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical model of a paradigm shift is used to explore changes that are occurring in public lands and water resources management. Recent policy developments suggest that the traditional paradigm, which is characterized by sustained yield, is in the process of being invalidated. While no new paradigm has been fully accepted, the emerging paradigm does appear to be based on two principles: ecosystem management and collaborative decision making. Implementation of these two principles is likely to require extensive revision of traditional management practices and institutions. Failure to address these issues could result in adoption of the rhetoric of change without any lasting shift in management practices or professional attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Atkinson, W. A. 1992. Silvicultural correctness: The politicalization of forest science.Western Wildlands 17(4):8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behan, R. W. 1990. Multiresource forest management: A paradigmatic challenge to professional forestry.Journal of Forestry 88(4):12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. J., and G. E. Grant. 1992. New approaches to forest management: Background, science issues, and research agenda, parts one and two.Journal of Forestry 90 (1 and 2):25–28 and 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, B. G., M. A. McGinnis, and K. A. Rait. 1991. Mitigating environmental externalities through voluntary and involuntary water reallocation: Nevada's Truckee-Carson River Basin.Natural Resources Journal 31(4):757–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, R. P., and S. M. Cordray. 1991. What should forests sustain? Eight answers.Journal of Forestry 89(5):31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, W. B., H. Salwasser, C. W. Cartwright, Jr. and J. A. Caplan. 1992. New perspectives for sustainable natural resources management.Ecological Applications 2(3):29–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 210 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. G. 1992. Ecologically effective social organization as a requirement for sustaining watershed ecosystems. Pages 73–90in R. J. Naiman (ed.), Watershed management: Balancing sustainability and environmental change. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser, C. 1992. Do we owe anything to the future? Paper presented to the Library of Congress Congressional Research Service workshop on multiple use and sustained yield: Changing philosophies for federal land management, 5–6 March. Washington, DC, 19 pp.

  • Mutch, R. W. 1992. A prescription for the Blue Mountains of Oregon.Inner Voice 4(2):12.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1990. Forestry research: A mandate for change. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, T. 1990. Holistic (new) forestry: Significant difference or just another gimmick?Journal of Forestry 88(4):23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. 1985. Public administration and public deliberation: An interpretive assay.The Yale Law Journal 94:1617–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidel, C., and J. Richardson. 1992. Visions of the future: New federal land management paradigms: Public/private cooperative paradigm. Paper presented to the Library of Congress Congressional Research Service workshop on multiple use and sustained yield: Changing philosophies for federal land management, 5–6 March. Washington, DC, 28 pp.

  • Salwasser, H. 1991. In search of an ecosystem approach to endangered species conservation. Pages 247–265in K. A. Kohm (ed.), Balancing on the brink of extinction: The Endangered Species Act and lessons for the future. Island Press, Covelo, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, M. A. 1990. Building public decisions: Learning through planning. An evaluation of the NFMA forest planning process. Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC, 108 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, M. A. 1992. Foresters as strategic thinkers, facilitators and citizens: A call to social integration and migration.Journal of Forestry 90(10):24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of American Foresters. 1992. Forestry resource management in the 21st century: Will forestry education meet the challenge? Proceedings of Symposium, 30 October–2 November 1991. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, Maryland, 86 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDI, National Park Service. 1992. Concept paper: American Heritage Landscape Program. Preliminary, March 1992. National Park Service, Denver Service Center, Denver, Colorado, 18 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York, 383 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortner, H.J., Moote, M.A. Trends and issues in land and water resources management: Setting the agenda for change. Environmental Management 18, 167–173 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393759

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393759

Key words

Navigation