Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of fire as a management tool for controllingSchinus terebinthifolius as secondary successional growth on abandoned agricultural land

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schinus terebinthifolius, native to South America, has become an aggressive woody weed in southern Florida, displacing native vegetation as well as rapidly invading disturbed sites. Studies to evaluate the effectiveness of fire as a management option for controllingSchinus on abandoned farmland in Everglades National Park, known as the “Hole-in-the-Donut,” began in 1979. Study plots were established to monitor any change(s) in herbaceous cover and in numbers and size ofSchinus stems. Except in the control plot (which was not burned), each site was burned as often as fuel conditions permitted (usually once every one or two years), through 1985. Results indicated that both the number and density ofSchinus stems increased over the course of the study. While plots that burned showed a reduction in the rate ofSchinus invasion, invasion still progressed rapidly with or without the occurrence of fire. The increase inSchinus stem density from 1980 to 1985 was highly significant in all transects except one. Herbaceous cover showed no clear trends relative to burning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alexander, T. R., and A. G. Crook. 1973. Recent and long-term vegetation changes and patterns in south Florida: part I: preliminary report. South Florida Environmental Project. University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida. 224 pp. PB-231,939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, T. R., and A. G. Crook. 1975. Recent and long-term vegetation changes and patterns in south Florida: part II: final report. South Florida Ecological Society. University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida. 827 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, G. N., and L. L. Loope. 1980a. Plants of Everglades National Park: a preliminary checklist of vascular plants. South Florida Research Center Report T-574. 41 pp.

  • Avery, G. N., and L. L. Loope. 1980b. Endemic taxa in the flora of South Florida. South Florida Research Center Report T-558. 39 pp.

  • Bridgewater, P. B., and D. J. Backshall. 1981. Dynamics of some western Australian ligneous formations with special reference to the invasion of exotic species.Vegetatio 46:141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgan, R. E. 1979. Estimating live fuel moisture for the 1978 national fire danger rating system. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-226. 17 pp.

  • Craighead, F. C., Sr. 1971. The trees of south Florida, vol. 1. The natural environments and their succession. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida. 212 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Jr. 1943. Vegetation of the Everglades and conservation from the point of the plant ecologist.Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of Florida 5A:104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doren, R. F., and L. D. Whiteaker. 1990. Comparison of economic feasibility of chemical control strategies on differing age and density classes ofSchinus terebinthifolius.Natural Areas Journal 10(1):28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egler, F. E. 1952. Southeast saline Everglades vegetation, Florida, and its management.Vegetatio 3:213–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. J., and L. Conde. 1979. Seeds in soils of former Everglades farmlands. Pages 225–234in R. M. Linn (ed.), Proceedings of the first conference on scientific research in the national parks, New Orleans.

  • Ewel, J. J., D. S. Ojima, D. A. Karl, and W. F. DeBusk. 1982.Schinus in successional ecosystems of Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center Report T-676. 141 pp.

  • Gerrish, G., and D. Mueller-Dombois. 1980. Behavior of native and non-native plants in two tropical rainforests on Oahu, Hawaiian Islands.Phytocoenologia 8:237–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herndon, A., and D. Taylor. 1986. Response of aMuhlenbergia prairie to repeated burning: changes in above-ground biomass. South Florida Research Center Report SFRC 86/05.

  • Hilsenbeck, C. E. 1976. An investigation of old field succession in Everglades National Park, 1st interim report. Everglades National Park. 63 pp.

  • Krauss, P. 1987. Old field succession in Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center Report, SFRC-87/03. 75 pp.

  • Little, E. L., Jr. 1978. Atlas of United States trees, vol. 5, Florida. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Misc. Publ. No. 1361. 256 pp. + maps.

  • Long, R. W. 1974. Vegetation of southern Florida.Florida Scientist 37:33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, R. W., and O. Lakela. 1971. A flora of tropical Florida. A manual of the seed plants and ferns of southern peninsular Florida. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida. 962 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loope, L. L., and G. N. Avery. 1979. A preliminary report on rare plant species in the flora of National Park Service areas of South Florida. South Florida Research Center Report M-548. 42 pp.

  • Loope, L. L., and V. L. Dunevitz. 1981. Investigations of early plant succession on abandoned farmland in Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center Report T-644. 65 pp.

  • Lotti, T., R. A. Klawitter, and W. P. LeGrande. 1960. Prescribed burning for understory control in Loblolly pine stands of the coastal plain. USDA Forest Service Station Paper Number 116. 19 pp.

  • Meador, R. E., II. 1977. The role of mycorrhizae in influencing succession on abandoned Everglades farmland. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 100 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, W. B., Jr. 1955. An analysis of the breeding-bird populations of tropical Florida in relation to the vegetation. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois. 599 pp.

  • Small, J. K. 1904. Report upon further exploration of southern Florida.Journal of the New York Botanical Garden 5:157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. K. 1929. From Eden to Sahara: Florida's tragedy. Science Press Printing Co., Lancaster, Pennsylvania. 123 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. W. 1985. Impact of alien plants on Hawaii's native biota. Pages 180–250in C. P. Stone and J. M. Scott (eds.), Hawaii's terrestrial ecosystems: preservation and management. Cooperative National Park Resources Study Unit, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P. B. 1980. The biology of trees native to tropical Florida. Harvard University Printing Office, Allston, Massachusetts. 480 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1958. Soil survey of Dade County, Florida. Series 1147, No. 4. Soil Conservation Service and the University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station.

  • Vitousek, P. M. and L. R. Walker. 1989. Biological Invasion byMyrica faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects.Ecological Monographs 50(3):247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, D., J. Ewel, and R. Hofstetter. 1980. Fire in south Florida ecosystems. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. General Technical Report SE-17. Southeast Forest Experiment Station. Asheville, North Carolina. 125 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteaker, L. D. and R. F. Doren. 1989. Exotic plant species management strategies and list of exotic species in prioritized categories for Everglades National Park. National Park Service Research/Resource Management Report SER-89/04. 21 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doren, R.F., Whiteaker, L.D. & Larosa, A.M. Evaluation of fire as a management tool for controllingSchinus terebinthifolius as secondary successional growth on abandoned agricultural land. Environmental Management 15, 121–129 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393843

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393843

Key words

Navigation