Skip to main content
Log in

Fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface: What the public expects

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban-wildland issues have become among the most contentious and problematic issues for forest managers. Using data drawn from surveys conducted by the authors and others, this article discusses how public knowledge and perceptions of fire policies and fire hazards change over time, the kinds of policy responses homeowners prefer as a way of preventing fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface, and how citizens view their own obligations as participants in interface issues. These data show that public attitudes toward fire have changed significantly over the past two decades and that educating the public about fire and the managers' use of fire can have positive effects on behavior. Yet, modifying the individual's behavior in regard to interface fire risks must also deal with important issues of individual incentives, the distribution of costs, and unanticipated policy impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Carpenter, E. H., J. G. Taylor, H. J. Cortner, P. D. Gardner, M. J. Zwolinski, and T. C. Daniel. 1986. Targeting audiences and content for forest fire information programs.Journal of Environmental Education 17(3):33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortner, H. J., M. J. Zwolinski, E. H. Carpenter, and J. G. Taylor. 1984a. Public support for fire-management policies.Journal of Forestry 82(6):359–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortner, H. J., P. D. Gardner, J. G. Taylor, E. H. Carpenter, M. J. Zwolinski, T. C. Daniel, and K. J. Stenberg. 1984b. Uses of public opinion surveys in resource planning.The Environmental Professional 6:265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, W. S. 1973. Fire prevention in Butte County, California: Evaluation of an experimental program, USDA Forest Service research paper PSW-98, Berkeley, California. 23 pp.

  • Folkman, W. S. 1979. Urban users of wildland areas as forest fire risks. USDA Forest Service research paper, Berkeley, California. 22 pp.

  • Gardner, P. D., and L. P. El-Abd. 1984. A study of the impacts of severe wildland fires and disaster relief programs on homeowners residing along the wildland—urban interface. USDA Forest Service technical completion report, Riverside, California. 69 pp.

  • Gardner, P. D., and H. J. Cornter. 1985. Wildland-urban fires in semi-arid environments: A southern California study of homeowner perceptions and public policy preferences. Pages 129–133in O. Templer (ed.), Forum of the association for arid lands studies, proceedings of the annual meeting. Texas Tech University International Center for Arid and Semi-Arid Land Studies, Lubbock, Texas.

  • Gardner, P. D., and H. Cortner. 1988. An assessment of homeowners' perceptions of wildland fire hazards: A case study from southern California. Pages 643–658in E. E. Whitehead, C. F. Hutchinson, B. N. Timmermann, and R. G. Varady (eds.), Proceedings, arid lands: Today and tomorrow. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. D., H. Cortner, and J. A. Bridges. 1985a. Wildfire: Managing the hazard in urbanizing areas.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40(4):318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. D., H. J. Cortner, and K. F. Widaman. 1985b. Forest-user attitudes toward alternative fire management policies.Environmental Management 9(4):303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. D., H. J. Cortner, and K. Widaman. 1987. The risk perceptions and policy response toward wildland fire hazards by urban home-owners.Landscape and Urban Planning 14:163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. D. 1972. Public attitudes toward fire. Pages 57–63in Proceedings of the symposium on fire in the environment. USDA Forest Service report 276, Denver, Colorado.

  • Hemenway, D. 1987. Private insurance as an alternative to protective regulation: The market for residential fire insurance.Policy Studies Journal 15(3):415–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J. C., W. R. Catton, Jr., L. D. Marlow, and C. F. Brockman. 1968. Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest: Their characteristics, values and management preferences. USDA Forest Service research paper PNW-61, Portland, Oregon. 92 pp.

  • Lucas, R. C. 1985. Visitor characteristics, attitudes, and use patterns in the Bob Marshall Wilderness complex, 1970–83. USDA Forest Service research paper INT-345, Ogden, Utah. 32 pp.

  • McCool, S. F., and G. H. Stankey. 1986. Visitor attitudes toward wilderness fire management policy—1971–84. USDA Forest Service research paper INT-357, Ogden, Utah. 7 pp.

  • Mushkatel, A. H., and J. Nigg. 1987. Opinion congruence and the formulation of seismic safety policies.Policy Studies Review 6(4):645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. C. 1979. Fire management policy in the national forests: A new era.Journal of Forestry 77:723–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C., and T. Buchanan. 1986. Interpreting controversial management policies.Journal of Forestry 84(2):60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, T., and Oliver M. 1985. Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness fire management plan, final draft. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 194 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauw, D. M. 1980. Interpreting the natural role of fire: Implications for fire management policy. Pages 228–233in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxson, R. 1988. California's experience in adopting roof covering regulations for wildland areas.Fire Journal 82(3):35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shands, W. E. 1988. Forest wildlands and their neighbors: Interactions, issues, opportunities. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H. 1976. Wilderness fire policy: An investigation of visitor knowledge and beliefs. USDA Forest Service research paper INT-180, Ogden, Utah. 17 pp.

  • Taylor, J. G., and T. C. Daniel. 1984. Prescribed fire: Public education and perception.Journal of Forestry 82(6):361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. G., H. J. Cortner, P. D. Gardner, T. C. Daniel, M. J. Zwolinski, and E. H. Carpenter. 1986. Recreation and fire management: Public concerns, attitudes, and perceptions.Leisure Sciences 8(2):167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaux, H.J. 1982. Forestry's hotseat: The urban/forest interface.American Forests 88:37, 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwolinski, M. J., H. J. Cortner, E. H. Carpenter, and J. G. Taylor. 1982. Public support for fire management policies in recreational land management. University of Arizona School of Renewable Natural Resources, Tucson, Arizona. 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortner, H.J., Gardner, P.D. & Taylor, J.G. Fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface: What the public expects. Environmental Management 14, 57–62 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394019

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394019

Key words

Navigation