Skip to main content
Log in

Negotiation support using the Decision Support System GMCR

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution constitutes a unique and flexible approach to the representation, analysis, and understanding of strategic conflict. This methodology, as implemented in the Decision Support System GMCR, constitutes a useful tool for negotiation support. Because GMCR includes efficient algorithms for calculating the stability of states, it encourages extensive comparisons of the consequences of different models of negotiators' decision making. GMCR also facilitates modifications to the way in which the conflict is represented, encouraging sensitivity and what-if analyses. The applicability of GMCR to negotiations is discussed in general, and in the context of a specific case study in environmental conflict resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergmann-Baker, U. (1991). “Groundwater Contamination and the Restoration of a Hazardous Waste Site in Elmira, Ontario—Relevance of Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making.” Master's thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany.

  • BramsS. J. (1993).Theory of Moves. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BramsS. J., and D.Wittman (1981). “Nonmyopic Equilibria in 2×2 Games,”Conflict Management and Peace Science 6, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, B. (1991). “Halt Cleanup Deal, Region Says.”Kitchener-Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, November 2.

  • Burtt, B. (1993). “Deal Made.”Kitchener-Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, March 13.

  • Crowley, K. (1991). “Uniroyal Agrees to Elmira Cleanup.”Kitchener-Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, October 8, p. A1.

  • Crowley, K., and C. Thompson (1991). “Region Kept Apprised of Uniroyal Cleanup Talks, Grier Says.”Kitchener-Waterloo Recora, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, October 9.

  • FangL., K. W.Hipel, and D. M.Kilgour (1989). “Conflict Models in Graph Form: Solution Concepts and Their Interrelationships,”European Journal of Operational Research 41, 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FangL., K. W.Hipel, and D. M.Kilgour. (1993).Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • FraserN. M., and K. W.Hipel. (1979). “Solving Complex Conflicts.”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9, 805–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FraserN. M., and K. W.Hipel. (1984).Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipel, K. W., L. Fang, D. M. Kilgour, and M. Haight. (1993a). “Environmental Conflict Resolution Using the Graph Model.” InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 1, Le Touquet, France, October 17–20, pp. 17–20.

  • Hipel, K. W., L. Fang, and D. M. Kilgour. (1993b). “Game Theoretic Models in Engineering Decision Making,”Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management, Japan Society of Civil Engineers 470/IV-20, 1–16.

  • HowardN. (1971).Paradoxes of Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers). (1991).Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, Charlottesville, Virginia, October 13–16, pp. 1978–2022.

  • IEEE (Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers). (1993).Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 1, Le Touquet, France, October 17–20, pp. 132–158.

  • KilgourD. M. (1984). “Equilibria for Far-sighted Players,”Theory and Decision 16, 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KilgourD. M. (1985). “Anticipation and Stability in Two-person Noncooperative Games.” In M. D.Ward and U.Luterbacher (eds.),Dynamic Models of International Conflict. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Press, pp. 26–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D. M., L. Fang, and K. W. Hipel. (1994). “The Decision Support System GMCR and the Management of Strategic Uncertainty.” InProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Processing and the Management of Uncertainty, Paris, France, July 4–8, pp. 638–643.

  • KilgourD. M., K. W.Hipel, and L.Fang. (1987). “The Graph Model for Conflicts,”Automatica 23(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, M. (1991). “Uniroyal to Do Cleanup.”The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 9.

  • NashJ. F. (1950). “Equilibrium Points inn-person Games.”Proceedings of National Academy of Science of the U.S.A. 36, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • NashJ. F. (1951). “Noncooperative Games.”Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RadfordK. J., K. W.Hipel, and L.Fang. (1994). “Decision Making under Conditions of Conflict,”Group Decision and Negotiation 3, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SageA. P. (1991).Decision Support Systems Engineering. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • SinghM. G., and L.Travé-Massuyès, eds. (1991). “Decision Support Systems and Qualitative Reasoning.”Proceedings of the IMACS International Workshop on Decision Support Systems and Qualitative Reasoning, Toulouse, France, March 13–15. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 101–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • vonNeumannJ., and O.Morgenstern. (1953).Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZagareF. C. (1984). “Limited-move Equilibria in 2×2 Games,”Theory and Decision 16, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L. & Hipel, K.W. Negotiation support using the Decision Support System GMCR. Group Decis Negot 5, 371–383 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404641

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404641

Key words

Navigation