Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of remodeling on the elastic properties of bone

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Cortical bone can be modeled as a complex hierarchical composite interrelating both structure and material properties on four levels of structural organization: molecular, ultrastructural, microscopic, and macroscopic. In young animals, the microstructural systems are long parallel lamellar units, plexiform bone, which in older or more mature animals converts by internal remodeling into multiple concentric lamellar units, secondary osteons, forming haversian bone. Ultrasonic wave propagation measurements performed on both plexiform and haversian bone clearly show a definitive relationship with microstructure; haversian bone can be described as a transversely symmetric material whereas plexiform bone appears to be orthotropic in nature. The anisotropy of the elastic constants are found to reflect the tissue symmetry; moreover, plexiform bone is stiffer and more rigid in all directions than is haversian bone. Similar experiments were performed on osteoporotic and osteopetrotic bone. While the results for osteoporotic bone are understandable in terms of the increased porosity, the results for the osteopetrotic bone are anomalous with respect to its density. Since Wolff, the remodeling of bone has been interpreted as a way of altering the mechanical properties to suit some need. For haversian remodeling from plexiform bone, the argument that adaptation occurs to optimize properties requires additional clarification since haversian bone appears to have inferior mechanical properties to plexiform bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Currey JD (1964) Three analogies to explain the mechanical properties of bone. Biorrheol 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Currey JD (1969) The relationship between the stiffness and the mineral content of bone. J Biomech 2:477–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz JL (1971) Hard tissue as a composite material. I. Bounds on the elastic behavior. J Biomech 4:455–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz JL (1980a) The structure and biomechanics of bone. In: Vincent JFV, Currey JD (eds) Mechanical properties of biological materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–168

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katz JL (1980b) Anistropy of Young's modulus of bone. Nature 283:106–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz JL (1981) Composite material models for cortical bone. In: Cowin SC (ed) Mechanical properties of bone. ASME, New York, AMD 45:171–184

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katz JL, Ukraincik K (1971) On the anisotropic properties of hydroxyapatite. J Biomech 4:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon HS, Katz JL (1976a) Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cortical bone. I. Theoretical considerations for hexagonal symmetry. J Biomech 9:407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon HS, Katz JL (1976b) Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cortical bone. II. Measurements of elastic properties and microhardness. J Biomech 9:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lipson SF, Katz JL (in press) The relationship between elastic properties and microstructure of bovine cortical bone. J Biomech

  11. Morgan B (1973) Osteomalacia, renal osteodystrophy and osteoporosis. Thomas CC (ed) Springfield Illinois, pp 241–338

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaffe HL (1972) Metabolic degenerative and inflammatory diseases of bones and joints. Lea & Febiger (eds) Philadelphia, pp 178–192

  13. Shapiro F, Glimcher MJ, Holtrop ME, Tashjian AH, Brickley-Parsons D, Kenzora JE (1980) Human osteopetrosis: a histological ultrastructural and biochemical study. J Bone Joint Surg 62-A:384–399

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abendschein W, Hyatt GW (1970) Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone. Clin Orthop Rel Res 69:294–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson LC (1964a) Morphologic analysis in pathology. In: Frost HM (ed) Bone biodynamics. Little, Brown Co, Boston, pp 543–654

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lanyon LE, Magee PT, Baggott DG (1979) The relationship of functional stress and strain to the processes of bone remodeling. An experimental study on the sheep radius. J Biomech 12:593–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carter DR, Smith DJ, Spengler DM, Daly CH, Frankel VH (1980) Measurement and analysis of in vivo bone strains on the canine radius and ulna. J Biomech 13:27–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Currey JD (1975) The effects of strain rate reconstruction and mineral content on some mechanical properties of bovine bone. J Biomech 8:81–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright TM, Hayes WC (1976) Tensile testing of bone over a wide range of strain rates: effects of strain rate microstructure and density. Med Biol Eng 14:671–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by NIDR Grant #DE07054 and NIHR Grant #G00820028

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawrence Katz, J., Yoon, H.S., Lipson, S. et al. The effects of remodeling on the elastic properties of bone. Calcif Tissue Int 36 (Suppl 1), S31–S36 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406131

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406131

Key words

Navigation