Skip to main content
Log in

Weber's law and perceptual categories: Another teleological view

  • Note
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an alternative to optimum-processor models in which sensors attempt to circumvent internal and external noise, a mechanism-independent argument is presented for Weber's law in vision and hearing. In vision, the argument is that categories of objects should be independent of the light intensity on these objects. In hearing, sound categorization should be independent of the distance from the sound source. An analogous desideratum for computer-based image segmentation is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Adelson, E. H. 1979. “Mathematics of Afterimage Discrimination.”J. opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1432a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, M. H. 1976. “Color Vision: An Evolutionary Approach.” Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978. “A Device Performing Illuminant-invariant Assessment of Chromatic Relations.”J. theor. Biol. 71, 473–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979. “Further Features of the Illuminant-invariant Trichromatic Photosensor.”J. theor. Biol. 78, 305–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and G. West. 1981. “Contributions to the Theory of Invariance of Color under the Condition of Varying Illumination.”J. math. Biol. 11, 337–350.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buchsbaum, G. 1980. “An Analytical Derivation of Visual Nonlinearity.”IEEE Trans. biomed. Engng BME-27, 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornsweet, T. N. 1970.Visual Perception. New York: Academic Press, pp. 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, A. R. and E. M. Riseman (Eds.) 1978.Computer Vision Systems. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatze, H. 1979. “A Teleological Explanation of Weber's Law and the Motor Unit Size Law.”Bull. math. Biol. 41, 407–425.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, D. B. 1940. “Hue Saturation and Lightness of Surface Colors with Chromatic Illumination.”J. opt. Soc. Am. 30, 2–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, E. H. and J. J. McCann. 1971. “Lightness and Retinex Theory.”J. opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, Y. 1968.Light, Color and Vision, 2nd Edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martynov, V. N. and B. I. Shkurskii. 1980. “Model of Visual Analyzer as Optimum Detection System.”Soviet J. opt. Technol. 47, 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massof, R. W. and S. J. Starr. 1980. “Vector Magnitude Operation in Color Vision Models: Derivation from Signal Detection Theory.”J. opt. Soc. Am. 70, 870–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. A. and F. S. Werblin, 1974. “Control of Retinal Sensitivity—I. Light and Dark Adaptation of Vertebrate Rods and Cones.”J. gen. Physiol. 63, 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnikoff, H. L. 1975. “On the Psychophysical Function.”J. math. Biol. 2, 265–276.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, H. 1967. “Perceptual Invariance and the Psychophysical Law.”Percept. Psychophys. 2, 533–538.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brill, M.H. Weber's law and perceptual categories: Another teleological view. Bltn Mathcal Biology 45, 139–142 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459392

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459392

Keywords

Navigation