Skip to main content
Log in

On a characterization of monotone likelihood ratio experiments

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pfanzagl (1962,Zeit. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth.,1, 109–115) showed that a dominated family of probability measures has monotone likelihood ratios with respect to some real valued statistic if there exists a set of tests which has certain nice properties. A similar characterization was given by Dettweiler (1978,Metrika,25, 247–254), who did not assume domination. However, Pfanzagl's result is not a special case of the one proved by Dettweiler. We present a theorem which comprises the results of both authors. Our proof shows that not all conditions introduced by them are needed. Furthermore, we investigate the question concerning the generality we get if we do not assume domination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dellacherie, C. and Meyer, P. A. (1978).Probabilities and Potential, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dettweiler, E. (1978). Über die Existenz überall trennscharfer Tests im nicht dominierten Fall,Metrika,25, 247–254.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fremlin, D. H. (1974).Topological Riesz Spaces and Measure Theory, University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh, J. K., Morimoto, H. and Yamada, S. (1981). Neyman factorization and minimality of pairwise sufficient subfields,Ann. Statist. 9, 514–530.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Heyer, H. (1982).Theory of Statistical Experiments, Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Karlin, S. and Rubin, H. (1956). The theory of decision procedures for distributions with monotone likelihood ratio,Ann. Math. Statist. 27, 272–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lehmann, E. L. (1959).Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfanzagl, J. (1960). Über die Existenz überall trennscharfer Tests,Metrika,3, 169–176.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfanzagl, J. (1961). Eine ergänzende Bemerkung zu der Arbeit “Über die Existenz überall trennscharfer Tests”,Metrika,4, 105–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfanzagl, J. (1962). Über trennscharfe Tests und monotone Dichtequotienten,Zeit. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth.,1, 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfanzagl, J. (1964). On the topological structure of some ordered families of distributions.Ann. Math. Statist.,35, 1216–1228.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Siebert, E. (1979). Pairwise sufficiency,Zeit. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 46, 237–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Mussmann, D. On a characterization of monotone likelihood ratio experiments. Ann Inst Stat Math 39, 263–274 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491466

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491466

Key words and phrases

Navigation