Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Action space as planning concept in spatial planning

  • Published:
Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Society is becoming more and more complex. This shows up in an increasing diversity of activity and mobility patterns of individuals, households, companies and organizations. In a network society, the significance of physical distance declines as the importance of available time increases. Many spatial planning concepts like ‘location policy’ and ‘the compact city’ and the criteria of accessibility do not take these developments sufficiently into account. This reduces the effectiveness of mobility and spatial policy.

Spatial planning can benefit from deeper insight into the time-space options that individuals have. For that reason, planners need concepts that help them to understand the behaviour of individual actors and to influence them at the local and regional level. One such concept is action space: the area within which persons can undertake activities. This paper presents the theoretical backgrounds of this concept.

A typology of action space for dual-income households with children, living in two Dutch municipalities, is constructed and analyzed. In addition, a model of action space, called MASTIC, is developed. This model allows planners to determine the degree to which the action spaces of individuals can be influenced. Some applications of the model are discussed: to identify the mobility effects of urban form; to coordinate services at the local level; and, finally, to assess the influence of demographic, cultural and economic developments on the composition of the population and thereby to study the aggregate mobility effects of an area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, W.P., S. Pavlos, S. Kanaroglou, and E.J. Miller (1996) “Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy”,Urban Studies (33), pp. 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D., S. Watson, and C. Wood (1997) “Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form”,Environment and Planning B (24), pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M.J. (1983) “Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure: 2. empirical tests”,Environment and Planning A (15), pp. 727–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, J. de, and M. Dijst (1997)Stedelijke ontwikkeling en milieu: contouren van een onderzoekprogrammering in opdracht van het Ministerie van VROM [Urban Development and the Environment: Contours of a Research Agenda for the Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning, and the Environment], Seminar Amsterdam/Utrecht: SENSE/NETHUR.

  • Bovy, P.H.L., A. Baanders, and J. van der Waard (1990) “Hoe kan dat nou?: de discussie over de substitutiemogelijkheden tussen auto en openbaar vervoer” [How is that posible?: A discussion on the substitution between private car and public transport], in: J.M. Jager (ed.),Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk: meten, modelleren, monitoren, nieuwe ontwikkelingen in onderzoekmethoden, pp. 121–142, Delft: CVS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.A., and E.G. Moore (1970) “The intra-urban migration process: a perspective”,Geografiska Annaler (52B), pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttimer, A. (1980) “social space and the planning of residential areas”, in: Buttimer, A., and D. Seamon (eds.),The Human Experience of Space and Place, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (1998)The planned city: coping with decentralization-an American perspective, Paper prepared for the workshop on The Planned City, International Conference on “Cities on the Threshold of the 21st Century”, Utrecht University, April.

  • Chombart De Lauwe, P.H.S. Antoine, L. Couvreur, and J. Gauthier (1952)Paris et l’agglomération Parisienne: l’espace social dans une grande cité [Paris and the Parisian agglomeration], Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissie Dagindeling (1998)Dagindeling tijd voor arbeid en zorg: eindadvies [Daily schedules for paid employment and care: final advice report], Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissie THOZ (Toekomstscenario’s voor Herverdeling van Onbetaalde Zorg) (1995)Onbetaalde zorg gelijk verdeeld: toekomstscenario’s voor herverdeling van onbetaalde zorgarbeid [Unpaid Care Equally Distributed: Future Scenarios for Redistribution of Unpaid Care Labour], Den Haag: VUGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, F., M. Dijst, and T. Spit (1999) “Planning the compact city: the Randstad Holland experience”,European Planning Studies (forthcoming).

  • Dijst, M.J. (1995)Het elliptisch leven: actieruimte als integrale maat voor bereik en mobiliteit [An Elliptical Life: Action Space as Integral Measure for Accessibility and Mobility], Delft: Technische Universiteit Delft, Faculteit Bouwkunde (Ph. D. thesis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijst, M. (1997) “Spatial policy and passenger transportation”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (12), pp. 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijst, M., and L. Kapoen (1998) “Ontwikkeling van steden vanuit vervoersplanologisch perspectief” [Development of cities from a transport planning perspective], in: Dijst, M.J., and L.L. Kapoen (eds.),Op weg naar steden van morgen, pp. 1–10, Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijst, M., T. de Jong, J. Ritsema van Eck, and V. Vidakovic (1997)MASTIC-2: Model of Action Space in Time Intervals and Clusters, Utrecht: Urban Research centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijst, M., T. de Jong, C. Maat, and J. Ritsema van Eck (1998)Wonen en mobiliteit op Vinex-locaties: hogere inkomenscategorieën in Zoetermeer-Rokkeveen [Living and Mobility on Vinex-locations: Higher Income Groups in Zoetermeer-Rokkeveen], Utrecht/Delft: Urban Research centre Utrecht/Onderzoeksinstituut OTB (DGVH/NETHUR partnership 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewe, P. (1996)De netwerk-stad VROM: bijdrage van informatietechnologieën aan nieuwe concepten van ruimtelijke planning [The Network City VROM: Information Technologies and their Contribution to new Concepts of Spatial Planning], Delft: vakgroep Stedebouwkunde, Faculteit Bouwkunde, TU-Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürckheim, K. von (1932) “Untersuchungen zum gelebten Raum: Erlebniswirklichkeit und ihr Verständnis systematische Untersuchungen II” [Research of living space: experience and understanding systematical research II],Neue Psychologische Studien (6), pp. 383–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, H. (1979)Planungsbezogene Aktionsraumforschung: theoretische Aspekte und eine empirische Pilotsudie [Action Space Research from a Planning Perspective: Theoretical Aspects and an Empirical Pilot Study], Hannover: Hermann Schroedel Verlag; Beiträge Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Band 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. (1974)Cluster Analysis, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, J. (1977)Stadtanalyse: soziale und räumliche Organisation der Gesellschaft [Urban Research: Social and Spatial Organisation of Society], Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R.G. (1978) “Learning about urban environments”, in: Carlstein, T., D. Parkes, and N. Thrift (eds.),Making Sense of Time, pp. 76–98, London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., H.W. Richardson, and M.J. Jun (1991) “The commuting paradox: evidence form the top twenty”,Journal of the American Planning Association (57), pp. 416–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünfeld, F. (1970)Habitat and Habitation: A Pilot Study, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1970) “What about people in regional science?”, Paper Ninth European Congress of the Regional Science Association.

  • Heijden, R.E.C.M. van der, and H.J.P. Timmermans (1988)Variatie-zoekend ruimtelijk keuzegedrag van openluchtrecreanten: theorie, modelvorming en empirische analyses [Searching for Variance in Spatial Choice Behaviour of Outdoor Recreation: Theory, Model Construction, and Empirical Analysis], Eindhoven: TU-Eindhoven, Faculteit Bouwkunde, Vakgroep Architektuur en Urbanistiek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvel, M.G. van den (1997)Openbaar vervoer in de Randstad: een systematische aanpak [Public Transport in the Randstad Holland: a Systematically Approach], Amsterdam: Thesis.

  • Holzapfel, H. (1986)Trip Relationships in Urban Areas, Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, F.E., and D.R. Reynolds (1971) “Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior”,Economic Geography (47), pp. 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobse, R.B., R. van Kempen, H. Hansman, F.M. Dieleman, and P. Hooimeijer (1997)Sociaal-culturele ontwikkelingen en perspectieven [Social-Cultural Developments and Perspectives], Utrecht: Urban Research centre Utrecht, Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingbeil, D. (1978)Aktionsräume im Verdichtungsraum: Zeitpotentiale und ihre räumliche Nutzung [Action Spaces in Urban Areas: Time Potentials and their Spatial Use], Kallmünz über Regensburg: Lassleben, Münchener Geographische Hefte 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolars, J.F., and J.D. Nystuen (1974)Human Geography: spatial design in world society, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich, B., V. Kriebich, and G. Ruhl (1989) “Vom Funktionsraum zum Aktionsraum: wissenschaftliche Grundlagen für eine Modernisierung der Infrastruktur-und Regionalplanung” [From functional space to action space: scientific foundations for a modernisation of infrastructural and regional planning],Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, Heft 1, pp. 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreukels, T. (1996) “Planningsdenken verouderd: de kloof tussen onderzoek en beleid” [Planning thought out of date: the gap between research and policy],Geografie (5), 3, pp. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutter, E. (1973) “Aktionsbereiche des Stadtbewohners: Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung der territorialen Komponente im Tagesablauf der städtischen Bevölkerung” [Action spaces of city dwellers: research on the meaning of a territorial component in daily life of urban population],Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften (13), pp. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenntorp, B. (1976) “Paths in space-time environment: a time geographic study of possibilities of individuals” Lund: The Royal University of Lund, Department of Geography (Lund Studies in Geography, Ser. B. Human Geography no.44.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1938)The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces, New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1984)Good city form, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maw, R. (1971) “Construction of a leisure model”,Ekistics (31), pp. 230–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing (1998)Nederland 2030-debat: verkenning ruimtelijke perspectieven [Netherlands 2030-debate: Exploration of Spatial Perspectives], Den Haag: Sdu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.B., and C. Rapkin (1954)Urban Traffic: a function of land use, New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, F., P. Debets, and H. Peters (1974)Habitats in Zuid-Holland West: verslag 1: een voorstudie voor een onderzoek naar het gebruik en waardering van de ruimte door bewoners van Zuid-Holland west [Habitats in South-Holland West: report 1: A Preparatory Study of a Research of the Use and Valuation of Space by Inhabitants of South-Holland West], Tilburg: IVA, Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, K., and K. Kondo (1992) “Trip linkages of urban railway commuters under timespace constraints: some empirical observations”,Transportation Research (26B), pp. 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, R.B. (1979) “Perception of urban retailing facilities: an analysis of consumer information fields”,Geografiska Annaler (61B), pp. 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. (1976)Place and placelessness, London: Pion Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W. (1996)De conditie van stedelijkheid en het vraagstuk van maatschappelijke integratie [The Condition of Urbanisation and the Problem of Social Integration], Den Haag: VUGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1985)User’s guide: statistics, Cary: SAS (5th edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, A. (1998) “The global demand for motorized mobility”,Transportation Research (32), pp. 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C., and R.P. Abelson (1977)Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into knowledge structures, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwesig, R. (1988)Räumliche Strukturen von Ausserhausaktivitäten: ein Konzept zur Analyse räumliche Verhaltens und empirische Überprüfung am Beispiel der Aktionsräume von Bewohnern der Stadsregion Hamburg [Spatial Structures of Outdoor Activities: a Concept for the Analysis of Spatial Relations and a Empirical Test with the Action Spaces of the Inhabitants of the Hamburg Region as an Example], Hamburg (dissertation).

  • Stiens, G. (1983)Neue Ansatspunkte für eine ausgleichsorientierte Infrastrukturpolitik [New Points of Application for a More Equitable Infrastructural Policies], Hamburg: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathman, J.G., K.J. Duecker, and J.S. Davis (1994) “Effects of householdstructure and selected travel characteristics on trip chaining”,Transportation (21), pp. 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verroen, E.J., and H.D. Hilbers (1995)Bereikbare nabijheid 2: een kwantitatieve analyse van alternatieve mobiliteits-vriendelijke vormen van verstedelijking in de Stedenring Centraal Nederland na 2005 [Accessible Proximity 2: A Quantitative Analysis of Alternative Mobility-friendly Forms of Urbanization in the Central Netherlands Urban Ring after 2005], Delft: TNO Beleidsstudies en Advies, Sector Verkeer en Vervoer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verroen, E.J., M.A. de Jong, and C.A. Smits (1995)Modeltoets Randstadvisie; de resultaten [Model Test Randstad Viewpoint: Results], Delft: TNO Beleidsstudies en Advies, Sector Verkeer en Vervoer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidakovic, V. (1980)Mens-tijd-ruimte: uit de dagboeken van 1400 Amsterdammers [Man-Time-Space: from the Diaries of 1400 Inhabitants of Amsterdam], Amsterdam: Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidakovic, V., and H. Blaas (1982)Op afstand bekeken: een studie naar de bezigheden en verplaatsingen van een drietal verschillend gesitueerde groepen Amsterdammers gedurende een driedaagse periode, het weekeind inbegrepen [From a Distance: a Study of Activities and Trips of Three Spatially Different Situated Groups of Inhabitants of Amsterdam for a Three Days Period, Including the Weekend], Interimrapportage II van het Satura II-dagboek, Amsterdam: Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening/Sociaal-Geografisch Instituut, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijgen, J., and R. van Engelsdorp Gastelaars (1986)Stedelijke bevolkingscategorieën in opkomst: stijlen en strategieën in het alledaags bestaan [New Rising Population Categories: Life Styles and Strategies in Daily Life], Amsterdam: KNAG/Instituut voor Sociale Geografie, Universiteit van Amsterdam (Nederlandse Geografische Studies 22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, B. van, and T. van der Hoorn (1997) “De invloed van ruimtelijke ordening op verkeer en vervoer: scenariostudies vergeleken”, [The influence of spatial planning on transport and traffic: a comparison between scenario studies],Tijdschrift Vervoerswetenschap, 1, pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR (Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid) (1998)Ruimtelijke ontwikkelingspolitiek [Spatial Development Policy], Den Haag.

  • Wolpert, J. (1965) “Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate”,Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association (15), pp. 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Y. (1979)The ‘UMOT’ project, Washington DC/Bonn: U.S. Department of Transportation/Ministry of Transport, FRG.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Martin Dijst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Martin Dijst (1957) is an associate professor of urban geography at the Urban Research center Utrecht (URU), Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University in the Netherlands. His research activities are focused on transportation studies. He is particularly interested in the relation between urbanization, infrastructure and the activity/travel patterns of specific population categories. In 1995 he completed his Ph.D. dissertation entitled “An elliptical life” in which he treats action space as an integral measure of accessibility and mobility.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dijst, M. Action space as planning concept in spatial planning. Neth J of Housing and the Built Environment 14, 163–182 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496820

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496820

Keywords

Search

Navigation