Skip to main content
Log in

Biocompatibility testing of a new silver-impregnated catheterin vivo

  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the local effects of polyurethane (Tecothane®) and silicone tubes with or without silver impregnation in rats. Bacterial colonization or infection of the exit site and/or tunnel were documented and interpreted. All tubes were placed subcutaneously or percutaneously in the neck of 41 Sprague-Dawley rats and guided beneath the dorsal muscles into the peritoneal cavity. The incidence of bacterial abscesses along the implanted tubes was evaluated daily. After 90 days, or earlier if sepsis developed, the animals were killed painlessly and various organs and tissues from the entry site and the catheter tunnel examined histologically. In the group where polyurethane tubes were placed percutaneously, there was no difference in the frequency of abscesses between silver-impregnated and non-impregnated tubes (5/6 with and 5/7 without silver). The only difference noted was in the group with percutaneously placed silicone tubes between those with and without silver. Abscesses only occurred in 2/4 animals in the silver group and in 5/5 animals in the control group. Histological examination showed no difference in either group between infectious and foreign body reactions. Silver particles in subcutaneous, muscle and peritoneal tissue could not be demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel, G.: Adverse events with catheters and toxicity testing. Med. J. Aust. May 14 (1983) 444–445.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Talja, M., Andersson, L. C., Ruutu, M., Alfthan, O.: Toxicity testing of urinary catheters. Br. J. Urol. 57 (1985) 579–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10993, Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 (1992–1994).

  4. Oloffs, A., Grosse-Siestrup, C., Bisson, S., Rinck, M., Rudolph, R., Gross, U.: Biocompatibility of silver-coated polyurethane catheters and silver-coated Darcon® material. Biomaterials 15 (1994) 753–758.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Böswald, M., Girisch, M., Greil, J., Spies, T., Stehr, K., Krall, T., Guggenbichler, J.-P.: Antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of polyurethane and silicone-catheters containing low concentrations of silver: a new perspective in prevention of polymer-associated-foreign-body-infection. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. 283 (1995) 187–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tecothane ®: Medical grade aromatic thermoplastic polyurethanes, biocompatibility and safety evaluations. Thermedics Inc., 470 Wildwood Street, Woburn, MA 01888, USA (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, R. L., Grashoff, G. J., Williams, D. F.: The biocompatibility of silver. Crit. Rev. Biocompatibility 5 (1989) 221–243.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Daunderer, M.: Handbuch der Umweltgifte. Toxikologische Einzelstoffinformationen zu Silber III-3. Ergänzungslieferung 5/93. ecomed-Verlag, Landsberg-Lech 1993, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böswald, M., Mende, K., Bernschneider, W. et al. Biocompatibility testing of a new silver-impregnated catheterin vivo . Infection 27 (Suppl 1), S38–S42 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02561616

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02561616

Keywords

Navigation