Summary
General procedures are described to generate quantitative randomized response (RR) required to estimate the finite population total of a sensitive variable. Permitting sample selection with arbitrary probabilities a formula for the mean square error (MSE) of a linear estimator of total based on RR is noted indicating the simple modification over one that might be based on direct response (DR) if the latter were available. A general formula for an unbiased estimator of the MSE is presented. A simple approximation is proposed in case the RR ratio estimator is employed based on a simple random sample (SRS) taken without replacement (WOR). Among sampling strategies employing unbiased but not necessarily linear estimators based on RR, certain optimal ones are identified under two alternative models analogously to well-known counterparts based on DR, if available. Unlike Warner’s (1965) treatment of categorical RR we consider quantitative RR here.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abul-Ela AA, Abdel-Hamied SM (1985) A Randomized Response Ratio Estimate from Quantitative Data. Proc Soc Stat Sec Amer Stat Assoc, pp 300–305
Cassel CM, Särndal CE, Wretman JH (1977) Foundations of Inference in Survey Sampling. Wiley, New York
Chaudhuri A (1987) Randomized Response Surveys of Finite Populations: A Unified Approach with Quantitative Data. Jour Stat Plan and Inf. 15:157–165
Chaudhuri A, Mukherjee R (1988) Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
Cochran WG (1977) Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York
Eriksson SA (1973) A New Model for Randomized Response. Rev Inter Stat Inst 41:101–113
Godambe VP, Joshi VM (1965) Admissibility and Bayes Estimation in Sampling Finite Populations, I. Ann Math Stat 36:1707–1722
Godambe VP, Thompson ME (1973) Estimation in Sampling Theory with Exchangeable Prior Distributions. Ann Stat 1:1212–1221
Godambe VP, Thompson ME (1977) Robust Near Optimal Estimation in Survey Practice. Bull Inter Stat Inst 47:3, 129–146
Greenberg BG, Kuebler R, Abernathy JR, Horvitz DG (1971) Application of the Randomized Response Technique in Obtaining Quantitative Data. Jour Amer Stat Assoc 66:243–250
Ho EWH (1980) Model — Unbiasedness and the Horvitz-Thompson Estimator in Finite Population Sampling. Aust Jour Stat 22:218–225
Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe. Jour Amer Stat Assoc 47:663–685
Kempthorne O (1969) Some Remarks on Statistical Inference in Finite Sampling. In: Johnson NL, Smith H Jr (eds) New Developments in Survey Sampling. Wiley, New York, pp 671–695
Lahiri DB (1951) A Method of Sample Selection Providing Unbiased Ratio Estimators. Bull Int Stat Inst 33:2, 133–140
Midzuno H (1952) On the Sampling System with Probabilities Proportionate to Sum of Sizes. Ann Inst Stat Math 3:99–107
Rao CR (1971) Some Aspects of Statistical Inference in Problems of Sampling from Finite Populations. In: Godambe VP, Sprott DA (eds) Foundations of Statistical Inference. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Toronto, pp 177–202
Rao JNK (1979) On Deriving Mean Square Errors and Their Non-Negative Unbiased Estimators in Finite Population Sampling. Jour Ind Stat Assoc 17:125–136
Rao JNK, Vijayan K (1977) On Estimating the Variance in Sampling with Probability Proportional to Aggregate Size. Jour Amer Stat Assoc 72:579–584
Sen AR (1953) On the Estimator of the Variance in Sampling with Varying Probabilities. Jour Ind Soc Agri Stat 5:2, 119–127
Vijayan K (1975) On Estimating the Variance in Unequal Probability Sampling. Jour Amer Stat Assoc 70:713–716
Warner SL (1965) Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias. Jour Amer Stat Assoc 60:63–69
Yates F, Grundy PM (1953) Selection without Replacement from within Strate with Probability Proportional to Size. Jour Roy Stat Soc B15:252–261
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chaudhuri, A. Randomized response: Estimating mean square errors of linear estimators and finding optimal unbiased strategies. Metrika 39, 341–357 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614017
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614017