Skip to main content
Log in

Void formation during tensile testing of dual phase steels

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of martensite volume fraction (MVF) and strain state on necking behavior, post-uniform elongation, and the nucleation and growth of voids in thin sheet dual phase steel, strained in tension, were investigated. Steel containing, in weight percent, 0.08C, 1.45Mn, and 0.21Si, was cold rolled 50 pct and intercritically annealed to produce dual phase microstructures. The effects of MVF were evaluated with a series of constant geometry tensile samples with martensite volume fractions between 5 and 40 pct. The effects of strain state within the neck were evaluated with a series of constant thickness samples with 20 pct MVF and with width variations between 3 and 25 mm. A transition from diffuse to localized necking, as well as a decrease in post-uniform elongation, occurred with both an increase in MVF and sample width. Metallographic analysis of deformed samples revealed that the void nucleation occurs primarily at martensite particles by three distinct mechanisms. The void size and density in the necked region increased toward the fracture surface in all samples and the void density was significantly higher for the samples which exhibited localized necking. However, independent of neck geometry, voids were nucleated uniformly throughout the samples, and were associated with the martensite. The difference in void size and density between the samples with different necking behavior indicates that void growth is a consequence of the strain gradient while the shape of the voids depends on both the strain state and strain gradient. The implications of the void structure analysis are interpreted based on the dual phase microstructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.K. Matlock, F. Zia-Ebrahimi, and G. Krauss: inDeformation, Processing, and Structure, G. Krauss, ed., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1984, pp. 47–87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Hayami and T. Furukawa: inMicroalloying 75, Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY, 1975, pp. 311–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. S. Rashid: inFormable HSLA and Dual Phase Steels, A. T. Davenport, ed., TMS-AIME, New York, NY, 1979, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. G. Davies:Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 41–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. R. Speich and R. L. Miller: inStructure and Properties of Dual- Phase Steels, A. T. Davenport, ed., TMS-AIME, New York, NY, 1979, pp. 58–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Gladman: inAdvances in the Physical Metallurgy and Application of Steel, The Metals Soc.iety, London, 1982, pp. 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. K. Balliger and T. Gladman:Metal Science, 1981, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 95–108.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. F. Hosford and R. M. Caddell:Metal Forming, Mechanics and Metallurgy, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983, pp. 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. H. VanStone, T. B. Cox, J. R. Low, Jr., and J. A. Psioda:International Metallurgical Reviews, 1985, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 157–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. P. Keeler and W. A. Backofen:Trans. of ASM, 1963, vol. 56, pp. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hill:J. of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1952, vol. 1, pp. 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. F. Hosford and R. M. Caddell:J. of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1952, vol. 1, pp. 294–99.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. F. Ramos, D. K. Matlock, and G. Krauss:Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 259–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. K. Balliger: inAdvances in the Physical Metallurgy and Application of Steel, The Metals Soc.iety, London, 1982, pp. 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li Chengji, D. F. Watt, G. R. Purdy, and A. F. Crawley: inHeat Treatment Shanghai '83, T. Bell, ed., The Metals Society, London, 1984, pp. 5.153–5.163.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. K. Ray:Scripta Metall., 1984, vol. 18, pp. 1205–09.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. F. Szewczyk and J. Gurland:Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 1821–26.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Tomota, H. Yoshino, and K. Kuroki:Scripta Metall., 1977, vol. 11, pp. 853–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. S. Baburamani, R. A. Jago, and R. M. Hobbs: inStrength of Metals and Alloys, R. C. Gifkins, ed., Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1982, vol. 1, pp. 115–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Uggowitzer and H. P. Stiiwe:Mat. Sci. and Engr., 1982, vol. 55, pp. 181–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. H. Nakagawa and G. Thomas:Metall. Trans. A, 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 831–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Formerly Graduate Research Assistant, Colorado School of Mines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinbrunner, D.L., Matlock, D.K. & Krauss, G. Void formation during tensile testing of dual phase steels. Metall Trans A 19, 579–589 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02649272

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02649272

Keywords

Navigation