Skip to main content
Log in

Some physical aspects of summer monsoon clouds—comparison of cloud model results with observations

  • Published:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The physical characteristics of the summer monsoon clouds were investigated. The results of a simple cloud model were compared with the aircraft cloud physical observations collected during the summer monsoon seasons of 1973, 1974, 1976 and 1981 in the Deccan Plateau region.

The model predicted profiles of cloud liquid water content (LWC) are in agreement with the observed profiles. There is reasonable agreement between the model predicted cloud vertical thickness and observed rainfall.

The observed cloud-drop spectra were found to be narrow and the concentration of drops with diameter > 20μn is either low or absent on many occasions. In such clouds the rain-formation cannot take place under natural atmospheric conditions due to the absence of collision-coalescence process. A comparison of the model predicted and observed rainfall suggested that the precipitation efficiency in cumulus clouds of small vertical thickness could be as low as 20 per cent.

The clouds forming in the Deccan Plateau region during the summer monsoon are, by and large, cumulus and strato-cumulus type. The vertical thickness of the cumulus clouds is in the range of 1.0-2.0 km. The LWC is found to be more in the region between 1.6-1.9 km A. S. L., which corresponds to the level at almost 3 / 4 th of the total vertical thickness of the cloud and thereafter the LWC sharply decreased. Nearly 98 percent of the tops of the low clouds in the region are below freezing level and the most frequent range of occurrence of these cloud—tops is in the range of 2.0-3.0 km A. S. L. The dominant physical mechanism of rain-formation in these summer monsoon clouds is the collision-coalescence process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman Bernice (1967), The nature of the meteorological fluctuations in clouds,J. Appl. Meteor.,6: 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, W. R. (1972a), Numerical simulation of precipitation development in supercooled cumuli, Part I,Mon. Wea Rev.,100: 757–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, W. R. (1972b), Numerical simulation of precipitation development in supercooled cumuli, Part II,Mon. Wea. Rev.,100: 764–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, W. R. (1975), On parameterization of turbulent transport in cumulus clouds,J. Atmos. Sci.,32: 548–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. A. and G. H. Fichtl (1969), Approximate equations of motions of gases and liquids,J. Atmos. Sci.,26: 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, R. K., S. K. Paul, A. S. R. Murty, K. Krishna, S. K. Sharma and Bh. V. R. Murty (1976), Measurments of cloud droplet sizse distributions in seeded warm cumulus clouds, PAGEOPH,114: 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. (1969), On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulation, Meteorological Monograph, 10,American Meteor. Soc., Boston, USA., 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, M. J. (1974), On the dispersion of a developing droplet spectrum in a turbulent cloud,Tellus,26: 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, M. J. and W. R. Cotton (1977), Formulation of approximate equations for modelling moist deep convection on the mesoscale,Atmos. Sci., Paper No. 266, Colo. St. Univ., Ft. Collins, Colorado, USA, 62 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. S. and W. M. Palmer (1948), The distribution of rain-drops with size,J. Meteor.,5: 165–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary Selvam A., A. S. R. Murty, R. Vijayakumar, S. K. Paul, G. K. Manohar, R. S. Reddy, B. K. Mukherjee and Bh. V. R. Murty (1980), Some thermodynamical and microphysieal aspects of monsoon clouds,Proc. Indian Academy of Sciences,89A: 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik, S. K. and P. Koteswaram (1955), Heights of tops of low clouds over India,Proc. Symposium on Artificial rain, C. S. I. R., New Delhi, India, 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. R. and M. K. Yau (1989),A short course in cloud physics, Third Edition, Pergament Press, New York, 293 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. T. and C. Chen (1970), Approximate formulae fitted to, the Davis-Sartor-Schafir-Neiburger droplet collision efficiency calculations,J. Atrnps. Sci.,27: 698–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J., R. H. Simpson, D. A. Andrews, and M. A. Eaton (1965), Experimental cumulus dynamics,Rev. Geophysics,3: 387–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. (1976), Precipitation augumentation from cumulus clouds and, systems: Scientific and Technological foundations, 1975:Rev. Geophysics,19: 1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Skatskii, V. I. (1963), An airborne water—content meter for clouds with sufficient liquid to form droplets,Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. geofiz., No. 9 (English edn. p. 885).

  • Squires, P. (1956), The micro-structure of cumuli in maritime and continental air,Tellus,8: 443–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J., (1970), On steady state one-dimensional models of cumulus convection,J. Atmos. Sci.,27: 1035–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selvam, A.M., Vijayakumar, R. & Murty, A.S.R. Some physical aspects of summer monsoon clouds—comparison of cloud model results with observations. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 8, 111–124 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657370

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657370

Keywords

Navigation