Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal separation of arsenic and antimony oxides

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to remove arsenic from antimony trioxide by two techniques: first, by selectively volatilizing the more volatile arsenic trioxide from a mixed oxide sample; and, second, by selectively condensing the less volatile antimony tetroxide at high temperatures, leaving arsenic trioxide to condense out at a lower temperature. Thermodynamic analysis of the As-Sb-O system indicated that if arsenic and antimony oxides behave like pure solid phases, then there is no limitation to producing pure antimony oxide by these proposed techniques. The selective volatilization experiments were carried out at 379 °C to 587 °C, using both nitrogen and air as carrier gases and an industrial antimony trioxide fume containing 13.8 wt pct As. The results showed it is difficult to achieve an arsenic content below 5.0 wt pct using either air or nitrogen, and formation of solid solutions between arsenic and antimony trioxides appears to be the main barrier to the removal of arsenic. Selective condensation experiments were carried out in which a mixed oxide vapor was progressively cooled through a series of condensers over a controlled temperature profile. Injection of oxygen into the vapor improved separation, and antimony tetroxide containing as low as 0.23 wt pct As was obtained. The recovery of antimony tetroxide in the experiments seems to have been limited by kinetic factors, and the results sug-gest that high conversions to antimony tetroxide are likely to be achieved only in antimony-rich vapors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.L. Read:Ind. Eng. Chem. 1928, vol. 20 (1), pp. 97–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. B.W. Lightfoot: Ausmelt Pty. Ltd, Victoria, Australia, private communication, 1992.

  3. R.A. Daniele: inArsenic and Mercury: Workshop on Removal, Recovery, Treatment, and Disposal, Proc. Conf. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Alexandria, VA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.A. Brooks: Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.H. Norman and H.G. Staley:J. Chem. Phys., 1964, vol. 41 (5), pp. 1503–04.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.E. Mauser:Metall. Trans. B, 1982, vol. 13B, pp. 511–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.P. Hager and T. Li:Reinhardt Schuhman Int. Symp., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1987, pp. 845–68.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.A. Brooks and W.J. Rankin:Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1994, vol. 25B, pp. 865–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D.L. Kaiser: Master's Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.W. Bale and G. Eriksson:Can. Metall, Q., 1990, vol. 29, pp. 105–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Formerly with the G.K. Williams Cooperative Research Centre for Extractive Metallurgy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, G.A., Rankin, W.J. & Gray, N.B. Thermal separation of arsenic and antimony oxides. Metall Mater Trans B 25, 873–884 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662769

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662769

Keywords

Navigation