Skip to main content
Log in

Union membership, market structure, and the innovation output of large and small firms

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determinants of the extent of union membership, industry concentration, and the innovation output of large firms and small firms are examined in a simultaneous-equations model. Data for 246 U.S. manufacturing industries are used to determine: (1) that there are significant interdependencies among these endogenous variables; (2) that contrary to recent findings, unionization is significantly lower in industries with high concentration and high innovation output; and (3) that although high unionization modestly reduces small-firm innovation output (as compared with large-firm innovation output), there is not a large difference in the effects of small-firm and large-firm innovation output on the extent of union membership across industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J., and David B Audretsch. “Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size.”Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (November 1987): 567–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis.”American Economic Review 78 (September 1988): 678–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____,Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley, and George E. Johnson. “Uionism, Relative Wages, and Labor Quality in U.S. Manufacturing Industries.”International Economic Review 13 (October 1972): 448–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., and J. Matthias G.V.D. Schulenburg. “Union Participation, Innovation, and Concentration: Results from a Simultaneous Model.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 146 (June 1990): 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E., Michael E. Porter, A. Michael Spence, and John T. Scott.Competition in the Open Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, William S. “Market Structure, Product Differentiation, and Industrial Research.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 81 (November 1967): 639–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Robert A., Barry T. Hirsch, and Mark Hirschey. “Union Rent Seeking, Intangible Capital, and the Market Value of the Firm.”Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (November 1986): 567–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Partha, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity.”Economic Journal 90 (June 1980): 266–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B., and James L. Medoff. “New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 32 (January 1979): 148–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____.What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, Henry G., and Dennis C. Mueller. “Industrial Research and Development, Intangible Capital Stocks, and Firm Profit Rates.”Bell Journal of Economics 9 (Autumn 1978): 328–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul. “Innovation, Technological Opportunity and Market Structure.”Oxford Economic Papers 42 (1990): 586–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Barry T. “The Interindustry Structure of Unionism, Earnings, and Earnings Dispersion.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (October 1982): 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, and John T. Addision.The Economic Analysis of Unions. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, Adam B., “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value.”American Economic Review 76 (December 1986): 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeller, C. Timothy. “Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size: A Simultaneous Equations Model.”Managerial and Decision Economics 16 (May–June 1995): 259–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, Jan.Elements of Econometrics, 2nd Ed. New York: Macmillan, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Richard C., and Peter C. Reiss. “Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure.” InR&D, Patents, and Productivity, Edited by Zvi Griliches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984, pp. 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Harold M. “Unionism, Concentration, and Wage Changes: Toward a Unified Theory.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 20 (January 1967): 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn, John. “The Roles of Property Rights and Market Power in Appropriating Innovative Output.”Journal of Legal Studies 19 (June 1985): 423–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “An Empirical Analysis of Process and Product Patenting: A Simultaneous Equation Framework.”Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (March 1986): 319–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “R&D, Concentration, and Advertising: A Simultaneous Equations Model.”Managerial and Decision Economics 10 (June 1989): 101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, David E., and Laurence Schumann. “Industry Structure with Fluctuating Demand.”American Economic Review 75 (September 1985): 758–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reshef, Yonatan. “Employees, Unions, and Technological Change: A Research Agenda.”Journal of Labor Research 14 (Spring 1993): 111–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M.,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulenburg, V.-Matthias G.V.D., and Joachim Wagner. “Advertising, Innovation and Market Structure: A Comparison of the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany.” InInnovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. Edited by Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991, pp. 160–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. Michael. “Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance,” InNew Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. Edited by Joseph E. Stiglitz and G. Frank Mathewson. Mathewson, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986, pp. 475–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G. “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5 (September–December 1984): 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to John W. Ballantine for his comments on this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koeller, C.T. Union membership, market structure, and the innovation output of large and small firms. Journal of Labor Research 17, 683–699 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685807

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685807

Keywords

Navigation