Abstract
Latin American populism has been characterized as a time-bound phenomenon, part of the political revolution against the old agricultural oligarchy and accompanying import-substitution industrialization. It has been asserted that populism died with the “exhaustion” of the “easy phase” of import-substitution, and that bureaucratic authoritarian regimes were predicated on that demise. Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Peru are regularly cited as evidence.
This article examines these definitional premises in light of the apparent resurgence of populist politics in the democratic transition in Brazil. It is argued that populism is not a pre-1964 anachronism, but is predictably appealing in the 1980s. Distinctions among populistappeals, contention for power, andsuccessful populist order suggest that populism and its leaders offer a very limited alternative to the future of Brazilian politics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALMEIDA, MARIA HERMINIA TAVARES DE 1987Novo sindicalismo and politics in Brazil. InState and society in Brazil: Continuity and change, ed. John D. Wirth, Edson de Oliveira Nunes, and Thomas E. Bogenschild, 147–78. Boulder and London: Westview Press.
ALT, JAMES E. and CHRYSTAL, K. ALEC 1983Political economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
ARCHDIOCESE OF SÃO PAULO 1987Torture in Brazil. New York: Vantage.
ARIDA, PERSIO, ED. 1986Inflação Zero: Brasil, Argentina, Israel. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
ASCHER, WILLIAM 1984Scheming for the poor: The politics of redistribution in Latin America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
ASHBY, JOE C. 1963Organized labor and the Mexican revolution under Lázaro Cárdenas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
BAER, WERNER 1983The Brazilian economy: Growth and development. New York: Praeger.
BAER, WERNER and BECKERMAN, PAUL 1989 The decline and fall of Brazil’s cruzado.Latin American Research Review Vol. 24, No. 1: 35–64.
BLOCK, FRED 1987Revising state theory: Essays in politics and postindustrialism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
BRESSER PEREIRA, LUIZ 1985Pactos políticos: do populismo a redemocratização. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense S.A.
CARONE, EDGARD 1976O estado novo (1937–1945). Rio de Janeiro: Difel.
CHACÓN, VAMIREH 1977Estado e povo no Brasil: as experiências do Estado Nôvo e da democracia populista, 1937–1964. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria J. Olympio Editora.
COHEN, ROGER 1989 Brazil imposes plan to quash hyperinflation.The Wall Street Journal, January 16, p. A5.
COLLIER, DAVID, ED. 1979The new authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
COSÍO VILLEGAS, DANIEL 1972El sistema político mexicano. Mexico: Cuadernos de Joaquín Mortiz.
DI TELLA, TORCUATO 1965 Populism and reform in Latin America. InObstacles to change in Latin America, ed. Claudio Veliz. New York: Oxford University Press.
DIX, ROBERT H. 1985 Populism: Authoritarian and democratic.Latin American Research Review, Vol. 20, No. 2: 29–52.
EVANS, PETER 1979Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
1985 After dependency: Recent studies of class, state, and industrialization.Latin American Research Review, Vol. 20, No. 2: 149–160.
FLYNN, PETER 1979Brazil: A political analysis. Boulder: Westview Press.
FOSTER, RICHARD W. 1985 Brazil’s likely new leader Is crafty mediator.The Wall Street Journal, January 14, p. 16, sec. 2.
GARCEZ, ITAMAR 1988 A decentralização partidária.Gazeta Mercantil, November 11, p. 5.
GARCIA, NELSON JAHR 1982O Estado Nôvo: ideologia e propaganda política: a legitimação do estado autoritário perante as classes subalternas. São Paulo: Loyola.
HALL, PETER 1986Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
HANSEN, ROGER D. 1971The politics of Mexican development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
HAVIGHURST, ALFRED F. 1979Britain in transition: The twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HIRSCHMAN, ALBERT O. 1971A bias for hope: Essays on development and Latin America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
1979 The turn to authoritarianism in Latin America and the search for Its economic determinants. InThe new authoritarianism in Latin America, ed. David Collier, 68–72. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
IANNI, OCTAVIO 1968O colapso do populismo no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Civilização.
Journal Do Brasil 1988a Nova política industrial contraria Constituinte. May 18, p. 11.
Journal Do Brasil 1988b Substituição de importações termina após 30 anos. May 17, p. 13.
KUCK, CLAUDIO 1988a Governo aguarda para compor comissão.Gazeta Mercantil, October 7, p.5.
KUCK, CLAUDIO 1988b Negociam-se os preços e os salários.Gazeta Mercantil, November 4, p. 1.
Latin American Weekly Report 1988 Parties fear wave of ‘mosquito’ votes. July 14, p. 2.
LITTLE, WALTER 1975 The popular origins of Peronismo. InArgentina in the 20th century, ed. David Rock, 162–78. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
LOPES, FRANCISCO 1986O choque heterodoxo: combate a inflação e reforma monetária. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.
LUDWIG, LAUERHASS, JR. 1972Getúlio Vargas and the triumph of the Brazilian nationalism: A study of the rise of the nationalist generation of 1930. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
LUZ, NICIA VILELA 1978A luta pela industrialização do Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Alfa-Omega.
MARTINS, LUCIANO 1986 The ‘liberalization’ of authoritarian rule in Brazil. InTransitions from authoritarian rule: Latin America, ed. Guillermo OvDonnell, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead, 72–94. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
MOSK, SANFORD A. 1950Industrial revolution in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
O Globo 1988 Brasil abre economia para o exterior. May 20, p. 19.
O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO 1973Modernization and bureaucratic authoritarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
1986 Introduction to the Latin American cases. InTransitions from authoritarian rule: Latin America, ed. Guillermo O’donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead, 3–18. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
OLIVEIRA, LUCIA, MONICA VELLOSO, and ANGELA MARIA GOMES 1982Estado novo: Ideologia e poder. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editors.
PICILLO, GIOVANNA 1988 O governo e a credibilidade do pacto.Gazeta Mercantil, October 28, p. 6.
PRZEWORSKI, ADAM 1986 Some problems in the study of the transition to democracy. InTransitions from authoritarian rule: Comparative perspectives, ed. Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe C. Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead, 47–63. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
RAMOS, HELIO 1981Pacto social: Caminho da democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
ROCK, DAVID 1975 Radical populism and the conservative elite, 1912–1930. InArgentina in the 20th century, ed. David Rock, 66–87. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
SANDERSON, STEVEN E. 1981Agrarian populism and the Mexican state: The struggle for land in Sonora. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
SCHMITTER, PHILIPPE C. 1968Development and interest politics in Brazil, 1930–1965. Master’s Thesis. University of California at Berkeley.
1971Interest, conflict and political change in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
SERRA, JOSE 1979 Three mistaken theses regarding the connection between industrialization and authoritarian regimes. InThe New authoritarianism in Latin America, ed. David Collier. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
SKIDMORE, THOMAS 1967Politics in Brazil, 1930–1964: An experiment in democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
SHEAHAN, JOHN 1987Patterns of development in Latin America: Poverty, repression, and economic strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
SMITH, PETER 1972 The social base of Peronism.Hispanic American Historical Review. Vol. 52 No. 1 (February): 55–73.
SMITH, TONY 1987 The underdevelopment of development literature: The case of dependency theory. InThe state and development in the third world, ed. Atul Kohli, 25–66. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
STEPAN, ALFRED 1973Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, policies, and future. New Haven: Yale University Press.
1986 Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and Comparative Considerations. InTransitions from authoritarian rule: Comparative perspectives, ed. Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe C. Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead, 64–84. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
TAMARIN, DAVID 1985The Argentine labor movement, 1930–1945: A study in the origins of Peronismo. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
THORP, ROSEMARY, ED. 1984Latin America in the 1930s: The role of the periphery in world crisis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Veja 1987a Começa o pós-Sarney. November 25, p. 39.
Veja 1987b Voto, suor e lágrima. November 25, pp. 42–5.
WIRTH, JOHN 1970The Politics of Brazilian development, 1930–1954. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Gamaliel Perruci, Jr., a native Brazilian, is a doctoral student in political science at the University of Florida. He is currently conducting research on Brazilian industrial and trade policy.
Steven E. Sanderson is professor of political science at the University of Florida. His most recent book isThe Transformation of Mexican Agriculture: International Structure and the Politics of Rural Change (Princeton University Press, 1986). He is currently completing a book entitledThe Politics of Trade in Latin American Development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perruci, G., Sanderson, S.E. Presidential succession, economic crisis, and populist resurgence in Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development 24, 30–50 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686989
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686989