Abstract
Latin American fieldwork may involve danger for researcher and subject alike. The researcher must work to minimize his or her own or others’ exposure to violence. Unobtrusive methods such as Q-Methodology, participant observation, and quiet interviewing are recommended so that the researcher can build a sustaining and protecting network of contacts. This article discusses the interpersonal relations, problems of security, and field entry techniques involved in sensitive research situations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alves, Maria Helena Moreira. 1984.Estado e Oposição no Brasíl 1964–1984. Petropolis: Editora Vozes.
Arns, Dom Paulo Evaristo Cardinal, ed. 1985.Brasíl: Nunca Mais. Petropolis; Editora Vozes.
Betto, Frei. 1982.Batismo de Sangue. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Civilização Brasileira.
Brown, Steven R. 1985.Political Subjectivity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Daniel, Herbert. 1982.Passagem para o Proximo Sonho. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Codecri.
Galeano, Eduardo. 1983.Days and Nights of Love and War. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973.The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman, Erving. 1959.The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Graham-Yooll, Andrew. 1982.A Matter of Fear. Westport: Lawrence Hill.
Herman, Edward S. 1982.The Real Terror Network. Boston: South End Press.
Kitzinger, Celia. 1987.The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage.
Lagoa, Ana. 1983.SNI: Como Nasceu, Como Funciona. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
Lofland, John and Lynn Lofland. 1989.Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth Publishers.
Lutz, Catherine A. 1989.Unnatural Emotions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marshall, Catherine and Gretchen Rossman. 1989.Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
McKeown, Bruce and Dan Thomas. 1988.Q-Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Peritore, N. Patrick. 1986. “Field Notes on the Use of Q-Methodology in a Study of the Brazilian Left.”Operant Subjectivity 1, 10 (October): 10–20.
-----. 1989a. “Mexico’s New Party Politics.”University Field Staff International Reports No. 15 March.
—————. 1989b. “Brazilian Communist Opinion: A Q-Methodology Study of Ten Political Parties.”The Journal of Developing Areas 23, 1 (October): 105–36.
—————. 1989c. “Liberation Theology in the Brazilian Catholic Church: A Q-Methodology Study of the Diocese of Rio de Janeiro in 1985.”Luso-Brazilian Review 26, 1 (Summer): 59–92.
—————. 1989d. “Brazilian Party Left Opinion: A Q-Method Profile.”Political Psychology 10, 4: 675–93.
-----. 1089c. “Catholicism and Socialism in Cuba.”University Field Staff Report No. 11.
—————. 1990a.Socialism, Communism and Liberation Theology in Brazil: An Opinion Survey Using Q-Methodology. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
—————. 1990b. “Brazilian Agrarian Reform: A Q-Methodology Opinion Survey on a Conflicted Issue.”Journal of Developing Areas 24, 4(April): 377–406.
-----. 1990c. “Opinion Types in Mexico’s RulingPartido Revolucionario Institucional.” 36 page ms., under submission.
Sábado, Ernesto. 1984.Nunca Más. Buenos Aires: EUBA.
Shweder, Richard and Robert LeVine, eds. 1986.Culture Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press
Stephenson, William. 1986a. “William James, Neils Bohr and Complementarity.” Part I,The Psychological Record 36:519–27.
—————. 1986b. “William James, Neils Bohr and Complementarity.” Part II.,The Psychological Record 37:529–43.
—————. 1986c. “William James, Neils Bohr and Complementarity” Part III,The Psychological Record 37:523–44.
—————. 1987. “William James, Neils Bohr and Complementarity” Part IV,The Psychological Record 37: 545–51.
—————. 1989. “Quantum Theory of Subjectivity.”Integral Psychiatry 6:180–95.
Timerman, Jacobo. 1981.Prisoner Without a Name, Cell Without a Number. New York: Knopf.
Webb, Eugene, ed. 1966.Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Ana Karina Galve de Peritore, his wife and frequent field collaborator, is a former professor of international relations at National Autonomous University of Mexico, and is currently a doctoral candidate in rural sociology at University of Missouri-Columbia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peritore, N.P. Reflections on dangerous fieldwork. Am Soc 21, 359–372 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691846
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691846