Skip to main content
Log in

The theory of preferential trading arrangements

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Theorie der PrÄferenzabkommen. - Hier wird ein überblick über die Theorie der geographisch diskriminierenden Handelspolitik gegeben. Der rote Faden ist, da\ es im Laufe der sechziger Jahre auf diesem Gebiet der Au\enhandelstheorie zu einem Stillstand kam, weil die grundlegende These, PrÄferenzzollsenkungen müssen einseitigen nicht-diskrimierenden Zollsenkungen unterlegen sein, mit dem rapiden Anstieg der PrÄferenzhandelsabkommen unvereinbar zu sein schien. Es werden Versuche zu einer Auflösung dieses Stillstands erörtert, wobei das Schwergewicht auf die Notwendigkeit gelegt wird, in die Analyse wieder internationale Verteilungswirkungen einzubeziehen.

Résumé

La théorie des accords commerciaux préférentiels. - L’auteur présente un aperÇu sur la théorie des politiques commerciales géographiquement discriminatoires. Le sujet unifiant est que pendant les années soixante cette approche théorique s’arrÊtait parce que la proposition centrale (c.-à.-d. réductions tarifaires préférentielles doivent Être inférieures aux réductions unilatérales non-discriminatoires) semblait Être inconsistante avec la prolifération des accords commerciaux préférentiels. L’auteur discute des approches pour résoudre cette difficulté en soulignant la nécessité de réintroduire des effets de distribution internationale dans l’analyse.

Resumen

La teoría del comercio preferencial. - Se présenta la teoría del comercio discriminatorio segÚn regiones geográficas. La necesidad de tratar este tema deriva del hecho de que durante la década del sesenta perdió fuerza la propositión central de esta teoría (reducciones arancelarias preferenciales son inferiores a reducciones arancelarias unilaterales y no discriminatorias) al ser inconsistente con la proliferatión de acuerdos sobre comercio preferencial observada. Se presentan varios intentas de resolver esta dificultad, poniendo énfasis en la necesidad de reintroducir efectos distributives internacionales en el análisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arndt, Sven W., “On Discriminatory versus Non-Preferential Tariff Policies”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 78, 1968, pp. 971–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Customs Union and the Theory of Tariffs”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 59, 1969, pp. 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, Bela A.,The Theory of Economic Integration. Homewood, III., 1961.

  • - (Ed.),European Economic Integration. Amsterdam 1975.

  • —, “The Tokyo Round and the Developing Countries”.Journal of World Trade Law, Vol. 14, 1980, pp. 93–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Robert E., Tracy Murray, “MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits under the GSP”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 87, 1977, pp. 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, Eitan, “Preferential Trading Theory; The n Commodity Case”.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, 1979, pp. 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “The Case for Unilateral Tariff Reductions: Foreign Tariffs Rediscovered”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 73, 1983, pp. 1141–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, Jagdish N., “Trade-Diverting Customs Unions and Welfare Improvement: A Clarification”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 81, 1971, pp. 580–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “A Reply to Professor Kirman”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 83, 1973, pp. 895–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, Richard, “General versus Preferential Tariff Reduction for LDC Exports: An Analysis of the Welfare Effects”.Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 38, 1972, pp. 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E., “The Economics of Reciprocity: Theory and Evidence on Bilateral Trading Arrangements”. In: Willy Sellekaerts (Ed.),International Trade and Finance. Essays in Honour of Jan Tinbergen. London 1974, pp. 17–54.

  • -,Harry G. Johnson (Eds.),Readings in International Economics. Homewood, Ill., 1968.

  • Cline, William R., “Reciprocity”:A New Approach to World Trade Policy? Washington 1982.

  • Collier, Paul, “The Welfare Effects of Customs Unions: An Anatomy”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 89, 1979, pp. 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Charles A., Benton F. Massell, “A New Look at Customs Unions Theory”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 75, 1965, pp. 742–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. Max,Recent Developments in the Theory of International Trade. Special Papers in International Economics, 7. Princeton 1965.

  • —, “Economies of Scale and Customs Union Theory”.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 80, 1972, pp. 456–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Customs Union Theory and the Nonuniformity of Tariffs”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 6, 1976, pp. 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Agraa, Ali M. (Ed.),International Economic Integration. New York 1982.

  • Ethier, Wilfred J., Henrik Horn, “A New Look at Economic Integration”. In: Henryk Kierzkowski (Ed.),Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Oxford 1984, pp. 207–229.

  • Gehrels, Franz, “Customs Unions from a Single Country’s Viewpoint”.Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 24, 1956/57, No. 63, pp. 61–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinols, Earl L., “An Extension of the Kemp-Wan Theorem on the Formation of Customs Unions”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 11, 1981, pp. 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “A Thorn in the Lion’s Paw. Has Britain Paid too much for Common Market Membership?”Journal of International Economics, Vol. 14, 1984, pp. 271–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Bob, John Whalley,Geographically Discriminatory Trade Arrangements. University of Western Ontario Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations Working Paper, No. 8321C. London, November 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Keith A. J., Andrei B. Sulzenco, “US Trade Policy and ‘Reciprocity’ “.Journal of World Trade Law, Vol. 16, 1982, pp. 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, Don D., Charles E. Ferguson, “The Domestic and World Benefits of a Customs Union”.Economia Internazionale, Vol. 13, 1960, pp. 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Harry G., “Discriminatory Tariff Reduction: A Marshallian Analysis”.Indian Journal of Economics, Vol. 38, 1957, No. 148, pp. 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Marshallian Analysis of Discriminatory Tariff Reductions: An Extension”.Indian Journal of Economics, Vol. 39, 1958, No. 59, pp. 177–181 (reprinted in Johnson, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • — [1960 a], “The Cost of Protection and the Scientific Tariff.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 68, 1960, pp. 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — [1960 b], “The Economic Theory of Customs Union”.Pakistan Economic Journal, Vol. 10, 1960, pp. 14–32 (reprinted in Johnson, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • -,Money, Trade and Economic Growth. London 1962.

  • —, “An Economic Theory of Protectionism, Tariff Bargaining and the Formation of Customs Unions”.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 73, 1965, pp. 256–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Trade Diverting Customs Unions: A Comment”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 84, 1974, pp. 618–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keesing, Donald B., Martin Wolf,Textile Quotas against Developing Countries. Thames Essays, No. 23. London 1980.

  • Kemp, Murray C.,A Contribution to the General Equilibrium Theory of Preferential Trading. Amsterdam 1969.

  • —, “An Elementary Proposition Concerning the Formation of Customs Unions”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 6, 1976, pp. 95–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, Alan P., “Trade Diverting Customs Unions and Welfare Improvement: A Comment”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 83, 1973, pp. 890–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Melvyn B., “Recent Developments in Customs Union Theory: An Interpretative Survey”.Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 10, 1972, pp. 413–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinin, Mordechai E., “On the Dynamic Effects of a Customs Union”.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 72, 1964, pp. 193–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -,Trade Relations of the EEC: An Empirical Investigation. New York 1974.

  • Lipsey, Richard G., “Mr. Gehrels on Customs Unions”.Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 24, 1956/57, No. 65, pp. 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “The Theory of Customs Unions: Trade Diversion and Welfare”.Economica, Vol. 24, 1957, pp. 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 70, 1960, pp. 496–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -,The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Equilibrium Analysis. London 1970.

  • Lipsey, Richard G., Kelvin Lancaster, “The General Theory of ‘Second Best’ “.Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 24, 1956/57, No. 63, pp. 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Peter J., “3 X 3 Theory of Customs Unions”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 12, 1982, pp. 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuIloch, Rachel, José Pinera, “Trade as Aid: The Political Economy of Tariff Preferences for Developing Countries”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 67, 1977, pp. 959–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, John, Ewen McCann, “Welfare Effects in Customs Unions”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 91, 1981, pp. 697–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Wolfgang, “Theoretical Considerations on Negotiated Tariff Adjustments”.Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 33, 1981, pp. 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, James E.,The Theory of Customs Unions. Amsterdam 1955.

  • Melvin, James R., “Comments on the Theory of Customs Unions”.Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 37, 1969, No. 2, pp. 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaely, Michael, “The Assumptions of Jacob Viner’s Theory of Customs Unions”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 6, 1976, pp. 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -,Theory of Commercial Policy, Trade and Protection. Chicago 1977.

  • Mundell, Robert A., “Tariff Preferences and the Terms of Trade”.Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 32, 1964, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Tracy W.,Trade Preferences for Developing Countries. London 1977.

  • Negishi, Takashi, “The Customs Union and the Theory of Second Best”.International Economic Review, Vol. 10, 1969, pp. 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Denis, “Customs Unions: Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in Historical Perspective”.History of Political Economy, Vol. 8, 1976, pp. 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Gardner,Discrimination in International Trade: The Policy Issues 1945-1965. Princeton 1966.

  • Pearson, Charles S.,Emergency Protection in the Footwear Industry. Thames Essay, No. 36. London 1983.

  • Pelkmanns, Jacques, Hans Gremmen, “The Empirical Measurement of Static Customs Unions Effects”.Rivista Internationale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, Vol. 30, 1983, pp. 612–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petith, Howard C., “European Integration and the Terms of Trade”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 87, 1977, pp. 246–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomfret, Richard W., “The Economic Consequences for Israel of Free Trade in Manufactured Goods with the EEC”.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 114, 1978, pp. 526–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Trade Preferences and Foreign Investment in Malta”.Journal of World Trade Law, Vol. 16, 1982, pp. 236–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Discrimination in International Trade: Extent, Motivation, and Implications”.Economia lnternazionale, Vol. 38, 1985, pp. 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,Mediterranean Policy of the European Community: A Study of Discrimination in Trade. London 1986.

  • Riezman, Raymond G., “A 3x3 Modell of Customs Unions”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 9, 1979, pp. 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Customs Unions and the Core”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 19, 1985, pp. 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel C.,Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics. London 1958.

  • de Scitovsky, Tibor, “Economies of Scale, Competition, and European Integration”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 46, 1956, pp. 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,Economic Theory and Western European Integration. Stanford 1958.

  • Smith, Adam,An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London 1776.

  • Spraos, John, “The Condition for a Trade-Creation Customs Union”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 74, 1964, pp. 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, Frank W., “Reciprocity”.Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 7, 1892, pp. 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, Robert,The Budget: On Commercial and Colonial Policy. London 1844.

  • Vanek, Jaroslav,General Equilibrium of International Discrimination: The Case of Customs Unions. Cambridge 1965.

  • Viner, Jacob, “The Most-Favoured-Nation Clause”.Index VI, 1931, No. 61, pp. 2–17.

  • -,The Customs Union Issue. New York 1950.

  • —, “Letter to W.M. Corden of 13 March 1965”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 6, 1976, pp. 107–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, John,Trade Liberalization among Major World Trading Areas. Cambridge, Mass., 1985.

  • Wonnacott, G. Paul, Ronald J. Wonnacott, “Is Unilateral Tariff Reduction Preferable to a Customs Union? The Curious Case of the Missing Foreign Tariffs”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 71, 1981, pp. 704–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonnacott, Ronald, J., G. Paul Wonnacott,Free Trade between the United States and Canada: The Potential Economic Effects. Cambridge, Mass., 1967.

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Pomfret, R. The theory of preferential trading arrangements. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 122, 439–465 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707373

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707373

Keywords

Navigation