Skip to main content
Log in

The fisher hypothesis: Evidence from three high inflation economies

  • Shorter Papers & Comments
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

In this paper, we have found strong evidence for a long-run unit proportional relationship between nominal interest rates and anticipated inflation for three high inflation economies (Argentina, Brazil and Mexico). These results contrast with the mixed evidence found for low inflation economies. We also found that for those three countries, as well as for the United States and Australia, the speed of adjustment of interest rates to inflationary shocks does not appear to depend directly on the absolute level of the inflation rate or any measure of inflation rate volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, Frank J., “Cointegration, Error Correction and the Fisher Effect”.Applied Economics, Vol. 21, 1989, pp. 1611–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, Carl S., “Correct Cointegration Tests of the Long-Run Relationship between Nominal Interest and Inflation”.Applied Economics, Vol. 23, 1991, pp. 1487–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, Michael R., “The Financial and Tax Effects of Monetary Policy on Interest Rates”.Economic Enquiry, Vol. 13, 1975, pp. 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, David A., Sastry G. Pentula, “Determining the Order of Differencing in Autoregressive Processes”.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 5, 1987, pp. 455–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, Mario H. Simonsen,Inflation Stabilization with Incomes Policy Support: A Review of the Experience in Argentina, Brazil and Israel. Group of Thirty. New York 1987.

  • Engle, Robert F., Clive W.J. Granger, “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”.Econometrica, Vol. 55, 1987, pp. 251 -276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F., “Short-Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 65, 1975, pp. 269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,Michael R. Gibbons, “Inflation, Real Returns and Capital Investment”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 9, 1982, pp. 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Irving,TheTheory of Interest. New York 1930.

  • Fuller, Wayne A.,Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York 1976.

  • Garbade, Kenneth, Paul Wachtel, “Time Variation in the Relationship between Inflation and Interest Rates”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 4, 1978, pp. 755–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Lars P., Robert J. Hodrick, “Forward Exchange Rates as Optimal Predictors of Future Spot Rates: An Econometric Analysis”.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, 1980, pp. 829–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, Seren, “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 12, 1988, pp. 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, R., P.D. Murphy, “Testing for the Long Run Relationship between Nominal Interest Rates and Inflation Using Cointegration Techniques”.Applied Economics, Vol. 21, 1989, pp. 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Stephen M., Frank S. Russek, “Co-Integration and Error-Correction Models: The Temporal Causality between Government Taxes and Spending”.Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 57, 1990, pp. 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Charles R., G. William Schwert, “Short-Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation: On Testing the Hypothesis that the Real Rate of Interest is Constant”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 67, 1977, pp. 478–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwald-Lenum, M.,Recalculated and Extended Tables of the Asymptotic Distribution of Some Important Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Test Statistics. Copenhagen University 1990, unpublished. (Reported in: M. Hashem Pesaran and Bahram Pesaran,Microfit 3.0: An Interactive Econometric Software Package. Oxford, 1991, p. 86.)

  • Perron, Pierre, “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Further Evidence from a New Approach”.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 12, 1988, pp. 297–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis”.Econometrica, Vol. 57, 1989, pp. 1361–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. William, “Effects of Model Specification on Tests for Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Data”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 20, 1987, pp. 73–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, Laurence H., “The Non-Adjustment of Nominal Interest Rates: A Study of the Fisher Effect.” In: J. Tobin (Ed.),Macroeconomics, Prices and Quantities: Essays in Memory of Arthur M. Okun. Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 241–244.

  • Tanzi, Vito, “Inflationary Expectations, Economic Activity, Taxes, and Interest Rates”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 70, 1980, pp. 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Mark P., “The Hyperinflation Model of Money Demand Revisited”.Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 23, 1991, pp. 327–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank,Brazil: Financial Systems Review. Washington, D.C., 1984.

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Phylaktis, K., Blake, D. The fisher hypothesis: Evidence from three high inflation economies. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129, 591–599 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02708004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02708004

Keywords

Navigation