Abstract
In this study, sex role portrayals were manipulated in an advertisement created for the study. The roles used were professional and housewife. One hundred one respondents chosen from several southwest towns were exposed to either the professional version of the ad or the housewife version, and were asked to evaluate the ad on a semantic differential scale. One of the items in the scale was an evaluation of the role of the individual in the ad, and was used in a manipulation check. The result of the ad evaluations indicated significantly higher scores for the professional version of the ad than for the housewife version.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, Michael and G. Churchill. 1977. “The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (Nov.): 538–55.
Courtney, Alice and S. Lockeretz. 1971. “A Woman’s Place: An Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements.”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (Feb.): 92–5.
Dominick, Joseph. 1979. “The Portrayal of Women in Prime Time: 1953–1977.”Sex Roles 5 (Aug.): 405–12.
Dominick, Joseph and G. Rausch. 1972. “The Image of Women in Network T. V. Commercials.”Journal of Broadcasting 16 (Summer): 259–65.
Duker, Jacob and L. Tucker. 1977. “Women’s Lib-ers Versus Independent Women: A Study of Preferences for Women’s Roles in Advertising.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (Nov.): 469–75.
Lundstrom, William and D. Sciglimpaglia. 1977. “Sex Role Portrayals in Advertising”.Journal of Marketing 41 (July): 72–79.
Mitchell, Andrew and J. Olsen. 1981. “Are Product Attributes the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitudes?”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (Aug.): 318–32.
Peevers, Barbara. 1979. “Androgyny on the T.V. Screen? An Analysis of Sex Role Portrayals.”Sex Roles 5 (Dec.): 797–809.
Rosen, Benson and T. Jerdee. 1974. “Influence of Sex Role Stereo-types on Personnel Decisions.”Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (Feb.): 9–14.
Rossiter, John and L. Percy. 1978. “Visual Imaging Ability as a Mediator of Advertising Response.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Ed. Keith Hunt, 621–29. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.
Schein, Virginia. 1973. “The Relationship Between Sex Role Stereotypes and Requisite Managerial Characteristics.”Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (Apr.): 95–100.
Shimp, Terence. 1981. “Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice.”Journal of Advertising 10 (June): 9–15.
Wagner, Louis and J. Banos. 1973. “A Woman’s Place: A Follow-Up Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (May): 213–14.
Whipple, Thomas and A. Courtney. 1980. “How to Portray Women in T.V. Commercials.”Journal of Advertising Research 20 (Apr.): 53–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kilbourne, W.E. An exploratory study of the effect of sex role stereotyping on attitudes toward magazine advertisements. JAMS 14, 43–46 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721815
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721815