Skip to main content
Log in

Personal and nonpersonal incentives in mail surveys: Immediate versus delayed inducements

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mail survey was conducted to empirically investigate contributions to charity as a method of stimulating responses to a mail survey. The research design included a control group and four experimental groups with the following treatments: a prepayment of $1.00 enclosed with the questionnaire (immediate personal reward), $1.00 promised upon return of the questionnaire with the respondent identified (delayed personal reward, no anonymity), $1.00 promised upon return of the questionnaire with no identification of the respondent (delayed personal reward, anonymity), and the promise of $1.00 contribution to a respondent-selected charity (delayed non-personal reward). The $1.00 prepayment yielded a statistically significant higher response rate than the $1.00 promised to charity or $1.00 promised upon return of the questionnaire. This study generally supports existing empirical foudnations of equity theory. An immediate personal reward yields a higher response rate than a delayed personal or non-personal reward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, J. Scott (1975), “Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 39 (Spring), 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Morton and Robert M. Krauss (1965).Theories in Social Psychology, New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, Schuyler W. and Edwin M. Gleason (1974), “Using Monetary Inducements to Increase Response Rates from Mailed Surveys,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (February), 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart, William M. and Marvin Bressler (1958), “Increasing the Responses to Mail Questionnaires: A Research Study,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 22 (Summer), 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Dan H. and Danny B. Bellenger (1978), “A New Method of Increasing Mail Survey Responses: Contributions to Charity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (November), 632–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Mitchel, Circulation Manager, Time Incorporated, Personal Correspondence, May 12, 1980.

  • Time Incorporated, “Time Subscriber Survey,” New York, April, 1980.

  • Walster, Elaine, G., William Walster, and Ellen Berscheid (1978),Equity: Theory and Research, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitemore, William J. (1976), “Mail Survey Premiums and Response Bias,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (February), 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wotruba, Thomas R. (1966), “Monetary Inducement and Mail Questionnaire Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (November), 398–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skinner, S.J., Ferrell, O.C. & Pride, W.M. Personal and nonpersonal incentives in mail surveys: Immediate versus delayed inducements. JAMS 12, 106–114 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729490

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729490

Keywords

Navigation