Abstract
Identifying innovative consumer segments remains an important goal for marketers of new products. This article examines the merits of a recently developed marketing oriented scale, called “open processing”, which is purported to measure an individual's openness or cautiousness tendencies with regard to new products, new sensations, new experiences, and information about them. In a test of the scale's concurrent validity, using self reports of new product trail/purchase behavior among female shoppers, the study found open processors to be more innovative than cautious processors, as was predicted. The study also explores the relationships between open processing, innovative behavior, and various demographic variables. Results indicated that (1) open processing is almost as strong a predictor of innovativeness as four commonly used demographic variables combined; and (2) that open processing is an influential moderator of the relationship between demographics and innovative behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, L.A. 1979, “Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective.” Studies in Diffusion of Innovation, Discussion Paper No. 60, Dept. of Geography, The Ohio State University. Columbus.
Craig, S.C., and James L. Ginter. 1975. “An Empirical Test of a Scale for Innovativeness.” In Mary Jane Schlinger (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research 2 (Chicago: Association for Consumer Research) 555–562.
Donnelly, James H., Jr., and John M. Ivancevich. 1974. “A Methodology for Identifying Innovator Characteristics of New Brand Purchasers.”Journal of Marketing Research 9 (August) 331–34.
Engel, James F., and Roger D. Blackwell. 1982.Consumer Behavior, 4th ed. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press.
Hair, Joseph F., Jr., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and B.J. Grablowsky. 1979.Multivariate Data Analysis. Tulsa: PPC Books.
Hirschman, Elizabeth C. 1980. “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity.”Journal of Consumer Research 7 (December) 283–295.
Jacoby, J. 1979. “A Multiple-Indicant Approach for Studying Innovators.” Purdue Papers in Consumer Psychology, No. 108. Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue University.
Kaigler-Evans, Karen L. 1975. “Fashion Information Source Effects in Inter-personal Communication.” Unpublished doctoral disseration, The Ohio State University.Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, Vol. 36, p. 38978B. (University Microfilms No. 76-3466, 162).
Kassarjian, Harold H. 1971. “Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review.”Journal of Marketing 8 (November) 409–418.
Leavitt, Clark, and John Walton. 1975. “Development of a Scale for Innovativeness.” In Mary Jane Schlinger (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 2. Association for Consumer Research, 545–554.
Leavitt, Clark, and John Walton. 1976. “Personality and Adoption Behavior.” Unpublished working paper. The Ohio State University, Columbus. (Available from the senior author).
Midgley, D.F. 1977.Innovation and New Product Marketing. New York: Halsted Press.
Midgley, David F., and Grahame R. Dowling. 1978. “Innovativeness: The Concept and its Measurement.”Journal of Consumer Research 4 (March) 229–242.
Robertson, Thomas S. 1971.Innovative Behavior and Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Robertson, Thomas S., and James N. Kennedy. 1968. “Prediction of Consumer Innovators: Application of Multiple Discriminant Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 5 (February) 64–69.
Rogers, Everett M. 1976. “New Product Adoption and Diffusion.”Journal of Consumer Research 2 (March) 290–301.
Rogers, E.M. and J. David Stanfield. 1966. “Adoption and Diffusion of New Products: Emerging Generalizations and Hypotheses.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Application of Sciences to Marketing Management, Purdue University.
Rogers, E.M. and F. Floyd Shoemaker. 1971.Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E.M., and Rekha Agarwala-Rogers. 1976.Communication in Organizations. New York: The Free Press.
Saunders, D.R. 1956. “Moderator Variables in Prediction.”Educational and Psychological Measurement 16, 209–222.
Sharma, Subhash, R.M. Durand, and O. Gur-Arie. 1981. “Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (August) 291–300.
Villani, Kathryn E.A., and Yoram Wind. 1975. “On the Usage of ‘Modified’ Personality Trait Measures in Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 2 (December) 223–228.
Walton, John, Eric N. Berkowitz and Clark Leavitt. 1978. “Validation of the Consumer Creativity Scale.”Proceedings of the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Division 23, 47–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Internorth, Inc.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joseph, B., Vyas, S.J. Concurrent validity of a measure of innovative cognitive style. JAMS 12, 159–175 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729494
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729494