Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring coalitions in the industrial buying center

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, little is understood about the behavioral dynamics which take place in the industrial buying process. Coalition formation has been emphasized as a frequent behavioral strategy on the part of buying center members. The absence of much theoretical or empirical work in the area of coalition formation within the buying center may be due to significant measurement problems. This article presents one approach for addressing these problems. Specifically, by using a sociometric method for data collection, group structure and coalitions are identified through the use of multidimensional scaling. To demonstrate applicability in a group context, multidimensional scaling is briefly reviewed. Results of an experimental application of this approach to a vendor choice decision are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P.F. and Chambers, T.M. 1983. “A Reward/Measurement Model of Organizational Buying Behavior.” Working Paper Series, Department of Marketing, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va. July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzai, Y. 1977. “Recognition of Coalition by Computer in a Three Person Game.”Behavioral Science 22, 403–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R.P. 1978. “Exchange and Decision Processes in the Buying Center.”Organizational Buying Behavior. T.V. Bonoma and G. Zaltman, eds., Chicago: American Marketing Assn. 100–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoma, T.V. and Zaltman, G. 1978. “Introduction.”Organizational Buying-Behavior. Chicago: American Marketing Assn. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, G.T. 1972.The Industrial Buying Decision. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choffray, J.M. and Lilien, G. 1978. “Assessing Response to Industrial Marketing Strategy.”Journal of Marketing 42 (April) 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. 1966. “Orthogonal Rotation to Congruence.”Psychometrika 31 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey, E.R. 1978.Procurement Management. Boston: CBI Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, Robert 1977. “What is The JCR Editorial Policy on Samples and Sample Requirements?”Newsletter Association for Consumer Research 7 (December) 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W.A. 1961. “A Theory of Coalition Formation.”American Sociological Review 26 565–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. 1978.Analyzing Multivariate Data. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and Carmone, F.J. 1970.Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Wind, Y. and Claycamp, H. 1975. “Brand Features Congruence Mapping.”Journal of Marketing Research 12 (August) 303–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. M. 1971. “Market Segmentation: A Strategic Management Tool.”Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (February) 18–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S.S. and Meek, D.D. 1978. “Generality and Validity of Some Theories of Coalition Formation.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, C.W. and Stem, D.E. 1979. “An Evaluation of Students as Surrogates in Marketing Studies.”Advances in Consumer Research 7 796–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuitty, L. 1957. “Elementary Linkage Technique for Isolating Orthogonal and Oblique Types and Typal Relevancies.”Educational and Psychological Measurement 17 207–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, H.A. and Lyons, M. 1972. “Perceived Support and Upward Mobility as Determinants of Revolutionary Coalitional Behavior.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 8 180–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moinpour, R., McCullough, J.M. and MacLachlan, D.L. 1976. “Time Changes in Perception: A Longitudinal Application of Multidimensional Scaling.”Journal of Marketing Research 13 (August) 245–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M.H. and Freedman, S. 1984. “Coalitions in Organizational Buying.”Industrial Marketing Management 13 (May) 123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R.W. 1979a. “Identifying Coalitions: Generating Units of Analysis.”Small Group Behavior 10 (August) 343–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R.W. 1979b. “The Coalition Game: Isolating Social System Subgroups.”Simulation and Games 10 (December) 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. and Kahan, J.P. 1976. “When Three Is Not Always Two Against One: Coalitions in Experimental Three-person Cooperative Games.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 12 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R., Romney, A.K., and Nerlove, S.B. 1972.Multidimensional Scaling, Theory and Application in the Behavioral Sciences vol. 1, NY: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, S. et. al. 1981.Multidimensional Scaling. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spekman, R.E. and Stern, L.W. 1979. “Environmental Uncertainty and Buying Group Structure: An Empirical Investigation.”Journal of Marketing 43 (Spring) 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, G. 1962. “Tactics of Lateral Relationship: The Purchasing Agent.”Administrative Science Quarterly 7 (September) 161–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F.E. and Wind, Y. 1972.Organizational Buying Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, R.E. 1966. “Identifying Industrial Buying Responsibility.”Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (February) 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, M.H., Stanton, W.W. & Calantone, R.J. Measuring coalitions in the industrial buying center. JAMS 13, 18–39 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737197

Keywords

Navigation