Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer of training principles for instructional design

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors wish to acknowledge the advice of Gavriel Salomon and William Winn on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Evidence is presented to establish that instructional technology applications often result in transfer of framing failures. These failures are attributed to the inappropriate mixing of behavioral and cognitive instructional design models. The principles that underlie transfer are described. It is then suggested that in order to achieve transfer we must carefully match levels of transfer, types of learning objectives, and student aptitude levels in order to select instructional methods, Specific suggestions are made for instructional design prescriptions that support different levels of fransfer for different types of learning objectives and learners, Suggestions for needed research are also included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C, & Myrow, D. L. (1971). Retroactive inhibition of meaningful discourse.Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D. (1979).Human cognition: Learning, understanding and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Nitsch, K., & Franks, J. (1977). Schooling and the facilitation of knowledge. In R. C. Anderson, R. Spiro, & W. Montigue (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W., & Lohnes, P. (1976).Evaluation research in education. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1984). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation.Educational Psychologist, 18 (2), 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977).Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiVesta, F. J., & Peverly, T. (1984). The effects of encoding variability, processing activity and rule example sequences on the transfer of conceptual rules.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. (1965).The transfer of training. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. (1984). Analogical thinking and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1974). Acquisition processes and resilience under varying testing conditions for structurally different problem solving procedures.Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 644–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning?Review of Educational Research, 49, 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical texts: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 770–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Greeno, J. G. (1972). Structural differences between learning outcomes produced by different instructional methods.Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch, K. E. (1977).Structuring decontextualized forms of knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1972). On a theory of instruction: Why different forms of instruction result in similar knowledge.Interchange,3 (1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L. (1979). Aptitude x treatment interaction effect of teacher structuring and student participation in college instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., Janicki, T. C, & Swing, S. R. (1981). Aptitude x treatment interaction effects of variations in direct instruction.American Educational Research Journal, 17, 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1983).Instructional-design theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J. M. (1979). Theories of the transfer of learning.Educational Psychologist, 14, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1981). Analogical processes in learning. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.),Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. J. (1951). The learning process. In R. Pinter, J. J. Ryan, P. V. West, A. W. Aleck (Eds.),An outline of educational psychology. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude processes. In R.E. Snow, P. Federico & W. Montague (Eds.),Aptitude, learning and instruction, (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (3), 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1980, September). Factor theories of intelligence are all right, almost.Educational Researcher, 6–18.

  • Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of movement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions.Psychological Review, 8, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, R.E., Voogel, A. Transfer of training principles for instructional design. ECTJ 33, 113–123 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769112

Keywords

Navigation