Skip to main content
Log in

Normalization and excluded middle. I

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The usual rule used to obtain natural deduction formulations of classical logic from intuitionistic logic, namely

is stronger then necessary, and will give classical logic when added to minimal logic. A rule which is precisely strong enough to give classical logic from intuitionistic logic, and which is thus exactly equivalent to the law of the excluded middle, is

It is a special case of a version of Peirce's law:

In this paper it is shown how to normalize logics defined using these last two rules. Part I deals with propositional logics and first order predicate logics. Part II will deal with first order arithmetic and second order logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Saharon Shelah & Jouko Väänänen

References

  1. H. B. Curry,A Theory of Formal Deducibility, Notre Dame Mathematical Lectures No. 6, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1950. Second Edition 1957.

  2. H. B. Curry,The system LD,Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (1952), pp. 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. B. Curry,Foundations of Mathematical Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963. Reprinted by Dover, 1977 and 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. B. Curry,A deduction theorem for inferential predicate calculus, inContributions to Mathematical Logic (ed. K. Schütte), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968, pp. 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. V. Glivenko,Sur quelques points de la logique de M. Brouwer,Acad. Roy. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci. 15 (1929), pp. 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Muti,On application of Peirce's rule: a solution of Curry's problem, unpublished typescript, 1967.

  7. D. Prawitz,Natural Deduction: a Proof Theoretical Study, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Prawitz,Ideas and results in proof theory, inProceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium (ed. J. E. Fenstad), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971, pp 235–307.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. P. Seldin,Proof normalizations and generalizations of Glivenko's theorem (abstract), volume of contributed papers for the Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London, Ontario, August–September 1975, pp. I 43–44.

  10. J. P. Seldin,Normalization for second order logics with excluded middle (abstract),Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (1981), pp. 430–431.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. P. Seldin,On the proof theory of the intermediate logic MH,Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1986), pp. 626–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. W. Tait,Intensional interpretations of functionals of finite type,Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (1967), pp. 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by grants EQ1648, EQ2908, and CE 110 of the program Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'aide à la Recherche (F.C.A.R.) of the Quèbec Ministry of Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seldin, J.P. Normalization and excluded middle. I. Stud Logica 48, 193–217 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770512

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770512

Keywords

Navigation