Skip to main content
Log in

Electrode polarization in the DC electroslag melting of pure iron

  • Process Metallurgy
  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is evident from the known ionic properties of the slags used in electroslag melting, that the dc melting process must be accompanied by Faradaic reactions on the slag/ingot and slag/electrode interfaces. The present work has determined the magnitude of the overpotentials resulting from concentration polarization at these interfaces, in the case of pure iron/CaF2+Al2O3, CaF2+CaO slags using a galvanostatic pulsing technique in an electrolytic cell. The polarization overpotential existing on an electrode in an operating ESR unit has been measured by the same technique. It is found that the potentials observed on the ESR electrode agree well with the results from the electrolytic cell. The primary anodic process is postulated to be the corrosion of iron, leading to an Fe2+-saturated layer on the anode surface at sufficiently high current densities. The cathodic process is suggested to be the Faradaic reduction of Al3+ or Ca2+, to give a concentration of [Al]Fe or (Ca)slag in the cathode interface region. This observation is supported by the fact that the cathodic potentials with respect to a C/CO reference electrode are close to those predicted from the reactions: (Al2O3)+3C=3CO(g)+2Al(l) or (CaO)+C=CO(g)+Ca(g) At very high current densities both the anodic and cathodic processes may convert to arcs, leading to process instability. The chemical and thermal effects of the overpotentials are briefly discussed and compared with the present results on ESR ingots of pure iron.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Cameron, A. Mitchell, and M. Etieme:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 1839–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Whittaker: Ph.D. Thesis. McMaster University, 1968.

  3. W. Holzgruber and E. Plöckinger:Berg. Huttenmaem. Monatsh., 1968, vol. 113, pp. 83–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Holzgruber, K. Petersen, and P. E. Schneider:Trans. Int. Vacuum Met. Conf., p. 518, American Vacuum Society, 1968.

  5. R. Roberts:Proc. 2nd. Int. Conf. on ESR, vol. 2. Mellon Institute, 1970.

  6. W. Holzgruber and E. Plöckinger:Trans. Int. Vacuum Met. Conf., pp. 1–24. American Vacuum Society, 1969.

  7. P. P. Evessev:Aytomat. Svarka, 1967, vol. 176, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. P. Smith:Molten Salt Chemistry, M. Blander, ed., p. 427, Interscience. New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. D. Shantarin, O. A. Esin, and V. N. Boromenkov:Elektrokimiya, 1967, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 775–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Ghosh and T. B. King:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1969, vol. 245, pp. 145–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Pizzini, R. Morlotti, and E. Romer: Euraton Report EUR 804e. 1965.

  12. H. A. Laitinen, C. H. Liu, and W. S. Ferguson:Anal. Chem., 1960, vol. 30, p. 698.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Mitchell:J. Vac. Sci. Tech., 1970, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. S63-S73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. H. Kellogg:J. Electrochem. Soc., 1950, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 131–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. J. Welch and N. E. Richards:Extractive Metallurgy of Aluminum, vol. 2, G. Gerard, ed., pp. 15–30, Interscience, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Delahay:New Instramental Methods in Electrochemistry, p. 350ff. Interscience, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Mitchell and B. Burel::J. Iron Steel Inst., 1970, vol. 208, p. 407.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. O’M. Bockris and A. K. N. Reddy:Modern Electrochemistry, vol. 2, p. 1052ff. Plenum Press, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. A. K. Kay, A. Mitchell, and M. Ram:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1970, vol. 208, pp. 141–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Manthey and W. Conzelmann:Z. Elektrochem., 1926, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 330–36.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Drossbach:Z. Elektrochem., 1951, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Mitchell:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1968, vol. 242 p. 2507.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Campbell:J. Metals, 1970, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 23–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. K. J. Vetter:Electrochemical Kinetics, p. 698ff. Academic Press, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. F. Elliot, M. Gleiser, and V. Ramakrishna:Thermochemistry for Steelmaking, vol. 2, p. 633, Addison-Wesley, 1963.

  26. P. Kozakevitch and G. Urbain:Mém. Sci. Rev. Met., 1961, vol. 58, p. 517.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu. V. Naiditch, N. V. Eremenko, and L. F. Kirichenko:Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1962, vol. 7, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, A., Beynon, G. Electrode polarization in the DC electroslag melting of pure iron. Metall Trans 2, 3333–3345 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811614

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811614

Keywords

Navigation