Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of moisture stress at three growth stages on the yield, components of yield and processing quality of eight potato varieties

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted over a three year period in southern Alberta to establish the yield and quality responses of eight potato varieties-Atlantic, Conestoga, Norchip, Niska, Shepody, Ranger Russet (Idaho clone), Ranger Russet (Amisk clone) and Russet Burbank to a single transient moisture stress (-80 kPa) at three growth stages in crop development (early, midseason and late). Early and midseason moisture stress had the greatest negative impact (P<0.05) on tuber yield. Of the eight varieties, Atlantic and Conestoga appear to be particularly sensitive to stress at these two growth stages. Midseason stress also appeared to reduce specific gravity. A year x stress interaction (P<0.05) for fry color suggests that the influence of moisture stress on fry color can be modified by other environmental factors. The results of the study demonstrate the importance of maintaining adequate soil moisture at all stages during crop development.

Compendio

Se condujo un estudio en un periodo de tres años al sur de Alberta, para establecer la respuesta en rendimiento y calidad de ocho variedades [Atlantic, Conestoga, Norchip, Niska, Shepody, Ranger Russet (clon de Idaho), Ranger Russet (clon de Amisk) y Russet Burbank], a un estrés temporal a la humedad (-80 kPa) en tres estados de crecimiento durante el desarrollo del cultivo (temprano, a media temporada y tardíamente). El estrés al comienzo y a mediados de la temporada tuvo el mayor impacto negativo (P<0.05) sobre el rendimiento en tubérculos. De las ocho variedades, Atlantic y Conestoga parecen ser particularmente sensibles al estrés en estos dos estados de crecimiento. El estrés, a mitad de temporada, parece que también disminuyó la gravedad específica. Una interacción año x estrés (P<0.05), para color de fritura, sugiere que la influencia del estres sobre éste puede ser modifïcada por otros factores ambientales. Los resultados del estudio demuestran la importancia de mantener una humedad adecuada en el suelo en todos los estados durante el desarrollo del cultivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Dubetz, S. and K.K. Krogman. 1973. Comparison of methods of scheduling irrigations of potatoes. Am Potato J 50:408–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farries, B.C., D.R. Lynch and N. Foroud. 1994. A portable rainsheiter for moisture stress studies. Am Potato J (submitted).

  3. Foroud, N., D. R. Lynch and T. Entz. 1993. Potato water content impact on soil moisture measurement by neutron meter. Plant and Soil 148:101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, P.M. 1978. Water. Pp. 244–277. In: The Potato Crop ed. P.M. Harris. Chapman and Hall, London. 730 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iritani, W.M. and L. Weiler. 1973. The development of translucent end tubers. Am Potato J 50:223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kempthorne, O. 1952. The design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 631 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Larsen, D.C. 1984. Simplifying potato irrigation scheduling-The Idaho program. Am Potato J 61:215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lynch, D.R. and G.C.C. Tai. 1989. Yield and yield component response of eight potato genotypes to water stress. Crop Sci 29:1207–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacKenzie, R.C. 1987. The effect of water and nitrogen on the yield and quality of potatoes. pp. 21–24. In:Proc. of the 15th Annual Meeting of Prairie Potato Council, Calgary, AB.

  10. Martin, R.J., P.D. Jamieson, D.R. Wilson and G.S. Francis. 1992. Effects of soil moisture deficits on yield and quality of Russet Burbank potatoes. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 20:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT® User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th Ed., Vol 1, 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. 1686 pp.

  12. Shock, C.C., J.C. Zalewksi, T.D. Stieber and D.S. Burnett. 1992. Impact of early-season water deficits on Russet Burbank plant development, tuber yield and quality. Am PotatoJ 69:793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shock, C.C., Z.A. Holmes, T.D. Stieber, E.P. Eldredge and P. Zhang. 1993. The effect of timed water stress on quality, total solids and reducing sugar content of potatoes. Am Potato J 70:227–241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, G. 1969. A review of soil-moisture relationship in potatoes. Am Potato J 46:398–403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sowokinos, J.R. 1978. Relationship of harvest sucrose content to processing maturity and storage life of potatoes. Am PotatoJ 55:333–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stark, J.C. and I.R. McCann. 1992. Optimal allocation of limited water supplies for Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J69:413–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Struik, P.C. and G. Van Voorst. 1986. Effects of drought on the initiation, yield and size distribution ofSolatium tuberosum L. cv. Bintje. Potato Res 29:487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loon, C.D. van. 1981. The effect of water stress on potato growth, development, and yield. Am Potato J 58:51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, D.R., Foroud, N., Kozub, G.C. et al. The effect of moisture stress at three growth stages on the yield, components of yield and processing quality of eight potato varieties. American Potato Journal 72, 375–385 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849334

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849334

Additional Key Words

Navigation