Abstract
The present review gives an account of the applicability of mathematical modelling in ecological succession studies. The ability of particular model types to solve problems of both theory and management is discussed. The Markovian models are found to be useful for short term predictions, but of very limited value for theoretical considerations. Finally, the predictability of successional pathways is discussed. It is argued that the less we understand about processes in vegetation dynamics, the more we will see the course of succession as random and unpredictable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Acevedo M. F. (1981): On Horn's Markovian model of forest dynamics with particular reference to tropical forest.—Theor. Pop. Biol. 19: 230–250.
Allen T. F. H. etStarr T. B. (1982): Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity.— Chicago.
Anderson M. C. (1966): Ecological groupings of plants.—Nature 212: 54–56.
Austin M. P. (1980): An exploratory analysis of grassland dynamics: an example of a lawn succession.—Vegetatio 43: 87–94.
Austin M. P. (1981): Permanent quadrats: An interface for theory and practice.—Vegetatio 46: 1–10.
Bartos D. L. (1973): A dynamic model of aspen succession.—In: IUFRO Biomass Studies, University of Maine Press, Orono, p. 11–25.
Bartos D. L. (1978): Modeling plant succession in aspen ecosystems.—In: Proc. First Intern. Rangeland Congr., p. 208–211.
Bellefleur P. (1981): Markow models of forest-type secondary succession in coastal British Columbia.—Can. J. For. Res. 11: 18–29.
Binkley C. S. (1980): Is succession in hardwood forests a stationary Markov process?—Forest Sci. 26: 566–570.
Bledsoe L. J. etVan Dyne G. M. (1971): A compartment model simulation of secondary succession. —In:Patten B. C. (ed.): System analysis and simulation in ecology.—New York and London, p. 479–511.
Botkin D. B. (1981): Causality and succession.—In:West D. C., Shugart H. H. etBotkin D. B. [eds], Forest succession.—New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, p. 36–55.
Botkin D. B., Janak J. F. etWallis J. R. (1971): Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth.—J. Ecol. 60: 849–872.
Brannan J. R., Reneke J. A. etWaide J. (1984): A diffusion model of forest succession.— Technical Report No. 442, Clemson University.
Cattelino P. J., Noble I. R., Slatyer R. O. etKessell S. R. (1979): Predicting the multiple pathways of plant succession.—Environ. Manag. 3: 41–50.
Clements F. E. (1916): Plant succession; analysis of the development of vegetation.—Carn. Inst. Wash. 242: 1–512.
Clements F. E. (1936): Nature and structure of the climax.—J. Ecol. 24: 552–584.
Connell J. H. etSlatyer R. O. (1977): Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization.—Amer. Natur. 111: 1119–1144.
Cooke D. (1981): A. Markov chain model of plant succession.—In:Hiorns R. W. etCooke D. [eds.], Mathematical theory of the dynamics of biological populations II., p. 231–247.
Culver D. C. (1981): On using Horn's Markov succession model.—Amer. Natur. 117: 572–574.
Czárán T. (1984): A simulation model for generating patterns of sessile populations.—Abstracta Botanica 8: 1–13.
Dale V. H., Hemstrom M. etFranklin J. (1986): Modeling the long-term effects of disturbances on forest succession, Olympic Peninsula, Washington.—Can. J. For. Res. 16: 56–67.
Debusche M. et al. (1977): An account of the use of a transition matrix.—Agro-Ecosystems 3: 81–92.
Dostálková I., Kindlmann P. etRejmánek M. (1984): Simulation of species replacement on environmental gradient in the course of ecological succession.—Ecol. Modelling 26: 45–50.
Doyle T. W. (1981): The role of disturbance in the gap dynamics of a montane rain forest: an application of a tropical forest succession model.—In:West D. C., Shugart H. H. etBotkin D. B. [eds.], Forest succession.—New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, p. 56–73.
Dudek A. etEk A. R. (1980): A bibliography of worldwide literature on individual tree based forest stand growth models.—Staff Paper Series No. 12, Department of Forest Resources, Univ. of Minnesota.
Dvořák I., Kubinová L. etŠiška J. (1985): Time hierarchy in oscilating metabolic systems.— In:Capasso V., Grosso E. etPaveri-Fontana S. L. [eds], Mathematics in biology and medicine. Proceedings, Bari 1983.—Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, p. 300–305. [Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 57].
El-Bayoumi M. A., Shugart H. H. etWein R. W. (1984): Modelling succession of the eastern Canadian mixedwood forest.—Ecol. Modelling 21: 175–198.
Emanuel W. R., Shugart H. H. etWest D. C. (1978): Spectral analysis of forest dynamics: the effect of perturbations on long-term dynamics.—In:Shugart H. H. [ed.]: Time series and ecological processes.—Philadelphia, p. 193–207.
Emanuel W. R., West D. C. etShugart H. H. (1978): Spectral analysis of forest model time series.—Ecol. Modelling, 4: 313–326.
Engeberg J. etBoyarsky L. L. (1979): The noncybernetic nature of ecosystems.—Amer. Natur. 114: 317–324.
Enright N. etOgden J. (1979): Application of transition matrix models in forest dynamics:Araucaria in Papua New Guinea andNothofagus in New Zealand.—Aust. J. Ecol. 4: 3–23.
Finegan B. (1984): Forest succession.—Nature, 311: 109–114.
Finn J. T. (1985): Analysis of land use change statistics through the use of Markov chains.— 1985 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Chicago, p. sep. 1–8.
Galickij V. V. etKrylov A. A. (1984): Modelirovanije dinamiki rastitelnych soobščestv. Dvumernaja model odnovidovovo odnovozrastnovo soobščestva. [Modelling of plant community dynamics. Model of one species even-aged community on the plane.]—Puščino.
Gauch H. G., Chase G. B. etWhittaker R. H. (1974): Ordination of vegetation samples by gaussian species distributions.—Ecology 55: 1382–1390.
Gleason H. A. (1926): The individualistic concept of the plant association.—Torrey Bot. Club. Bull. 53: 7–26.
Godron M. etLepart J. (1975): Sur la representation de la dynamique de la vegetation au moyen de matrices de succession.—In:Schmidt W. [ed.], Sukzessionsforschung.—Vaduz., p. 269–287.
Gutierrez L. T. etFey W. R. (1980); Ecosystem succession. A general hypothesis and a test model of a grassland.—Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London (England).
Hahn J. T. etLeary R. A. (1974): On paper byH. H. Shugart, T. R. Crow etJ. M. Hett, Forest succession models: A rationale and methodology for modeling forest succession over large regions. Forest Sci., 19: 203–212, 1973.—Forest Sci. 20: 212.
Hemstrom M. etAdams V. D. (1982): Modeling long-term forest succession in the Pacific Northwest. —In:Means J. E. [ed.], Forest succession and stand development research in the Northwest.—Proc. Symp. 1981, Corvallis, Oregon, Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., p. 14–23.
Hobbs R. J. (1984): Markov models in the study of post-fire succession in heathland communities. —Vegetatio 56: 17–30.
Hobbs R. J. etLegg C. J. (1984): Markov models and initial floristic composition in heathland vegetation dynamics.—Vegetatio 56: 31–43.
Horn H. S. (1975a): Forest succession.—Sci. American 232: 89–98.
Horn H. S. (1975b): Markovian processes of forest succession.—In:Cody M. L. etDiamond J. M. [eds.], Ecology and the evolution of communities. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London (England), p. 196–211.
Horn H. S. (1976): Succession.—In:May R. M. [ed.], Theoretical ecology.—Toronto, p. 187–204.
Hulst R. van (1979a): On the dynamics of vegetation: succession in model communities.— Vegetatio 39: 85–96.
Hulst R. van (1979b): On the dynamics of vegetation: Markov chains as models of succession.— Vegetatio 40: 3–14.
Hulst R. van (1980): Vegetation dynamics or ecosystem dynamics: dynamic sufficiency in succession theory.—Vegetatio 43: 147–151.
Innis G. S. (1978) [ed.]: Grassland simulation model.—New York, Heidelberg, Berlin. [Ecol. Studies 26].
Innis G. (1979): A spiral approach to ecosystem simulation, I.—In:Innis G. S. etO'Neill R. V. [eds.], Systems analysis of ecosystems.—Statist. Ecol. Ser. 9, Maryland, p. 211–386.
Janos D. P. (1980): Mycorrhizal influence tropical succession.—Biotropica 12 (2, suppl., Tropical succession.): 56–64.
Juhász-Nagy P. etPodani J. (1983): Information theory methods for the study of spatial processes and succession.—Vegetatio 51: 129–140.
Jukola-Sulonen E. L. (1983): Vegetation succession of abandoned hay fields in central Finland. A quantitative approach.—Communicat. Inst. Fores. Fenniae 112: 1–85.
Kauppi P., Hari P. etKellomäki S. (1978): A discrete time model for succession of ground cover communities after clear cutting.—Oikos 30: 100–105.
Kawabata Z. etKurihara Y. (1978a): Computer simulation study on the relationships between the total system and subsystems in the early stages of succession of the aquatic microcosm.— Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. IV (Biol.) 37: 179–204.
Kawabata Z. etKurihara Y. (1978b): Computer simulation study on the nature of the steady state of the aquatic microcosm.—Sci. Rep, Tohoku Univ. Ser. IV, 37: 205–218.
Kellomäki S., Väisänen E., Kauppi P. etHari P. (1977): Production of structural matter by a plant community in successional environment.—Silva Fennica 11: 276–283.
Kercher J. R. etAxelrod M. C. (1981): SILVA: A model for forecasting the effects of SO2 pollution on growth and succession in a western coniferous forest.—UCRL-53109, Lawrence Livermore Natl. Laboratory, Livermore, California.
Kercher J. R. etAxelrod M. C. (1984a): A process model of fire ecology and succession in a mixed-conifer forest.—Ecology 65: 1725–1742.
Kercher J. R. etAxelrod M. C. (1984b): Analysis of SILVA: a model for forecasting the effects of SO2 pollution and fire on western coniferous forests.—Ecol. Model. 23: 165–184.
Kessel R. S. (1979): Gradient modelling: resource and fire management.—New York, Heidelberg et Berlin.
Kessell S. R. etPotter M. W. (1980): A quantitative succession model for nine Montana forest communitities.—Environ. Manage. 4: 227–240.
Kovář P. etLepš J. (1986): Ruderal communities of the railway station Ĉeská Třebová (Eastern Bohemia, Czechoslovakia)—note on the application of classical and numerical methods of classification.—Preslia 58: 141–163.
Krahulec F., Lepŝ J. etRauch O. (1980): Vegetation of the Rozkoŝ reservoir near Ĉeská Skalice (East Bohemia). I. The vegetation development during the first five years after its filling.— Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 15: 324–362.
Larson J. S., Mueller A. J. etMacConnell W. P. (1980): A model of natural and man-induced changes in open freshwater wetlands on the Massachusetts coastal plain.—J. Appl. Ecology 17: 667–673.
Leak W. B. (1970): Successional change in northern hardwoods predicted by birth and death simulation.—Ecology, 51: 795–801.
Legg C. J. (1980): A Markovian approach to the study of heath vegetation dynamics.—Bull. Ecol. 11: 393–404.
Lepŝ J. (1983): Matematické modelování dynamiky ekosystém⫲ a jejich složek. [Mathematical modelling of ecosystem dynamics.]—Ms. [Thesis, Dept. of Botany, Charles University, Praha].
Lepŝ J. etKindlmann P. (1987): Models of the development of spatial pattern of an even-aged plant population over time.—Ecol. Modelling 39: 45–57.
Lepŝ J. etPrach K (1981): A simple mathematical model of the secondary succession of shrubs.— Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 16: 61–72.
Leslie P. H. (1945): On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics.—Biometrika 33: 183–212.
Lippe E., De Smidt J. T. etGlen-Lewin D. C. (1985): Markov models and succession: a test from a heathland in the Netherlands.—J. Ecol. 73: 775–791.
Logofet D. O. etAlexandrov G. A. (1984): Modelling of matter cycle in a mesotrophic bog ecosystem. II. Dynamic model and ecological succession.—Ecol. Modelling 21: 259–276.
Łomnicki A. (1978): Przygody ekologów i ewolucjonistów w krainie superorganizmów. [Adventures of ecologists and evolutionists in the land of superorganisms].—Wiad. Ekolog. 24: 249–259.
Maarel E. van der (1979): Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity.—Vegetatio 39: 97–114.
MacArthur R. H. (1958): A note on stationary age distributions is single-species populations and stationary species populations in a community.—Ecology 39: 146–147.
Malanson G. P. (1984): Linked Leslie matrices for the simulation of succession.—Ecol. Modelling 21: 13–20.
Michajlov V. V. etNorin B. N. (1982): Opyt matematičeskovo modelirovanija dinamiki fitocenozov. [An attempt of mathematical modelling of phytocoenoses successions.].—Žur. Obšč. Biol. 43: 596–603.
Mielke D. L., Shugart H. H. etD. C. West (1978): A stand model for upland forests of southern Arkansas.—ORNL/TM-6225. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Miles J. (1979): Vegetation dynamics.—London. [Outline Studies in Ecology].
Miles, J., French D. D., Xu Zhen-Bang etChen Ling-Zhi (1985): Transition matrix models of succession in a stand of mixed broadleaved—Pinus koraiensis forest in Changbaishan, Kirin province, North-east China.—J. Environ. Manag. 20: 357–375.
Moravec J. (1969): Succession of plant communities and soil development.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 4: 133–164.
Munro D. (1974): Forest growth models—a prognosis.—In:Fires J. [ed.], Growth models for tree and stand simulation.—Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, p. 7–21.
Ogden J. (1983): Community matrix model predictions of future forest composition at Russel State Forest.—New Zealand J. Ecol. 6: 71–77.
Patten B. C. etOdum E. P. (1981): The cybernetic nature of ecosystems.—Amer. Naturalist 118: 886–895.
Pfister R. D. (1982): Designing succession models to meet management needs.—In:Means J. E. [ed.], Forest succession and stand development research in the Northwest.—Proc. Symp., 1981, Corvallis, Oregon, Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., p. 44–53.
Phipps R. L. (1979): Simulation of wetlands forest vegetation dynamics.—Ecol. Modelling, 7: 257–288.
Phipps R. L. etApplegate L. H. (1983): Simulation of management alternatives in wetland forest.—In:Jorgensen S. E. etMitsch W. J. [eds.], Application of ecological modelling in environmental management, Part B.—Amsterdam, p. 311–339.
Redetzke K. A. etVan Dyne G. M. (1976): A matrix model of a rangeland grazing system.— J. Range Mgmt. 29: 425–430.
Redetzke K. A. etVan Dyne G. M. (1979): Data based, empirical, dynamic matrix modeling of rangeland grazing systems.—In:French N. R. [ed.], Perspectives in grassland ecology.— New York, p. 157–172.
Rejmánek M. (1984): Perturbation-dependent coexistence and species diversity in ecosystems.— In:Schuster P. [ed.], Stochastic phenomena and chaotic behaviour in complex systems.— Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, p. 220–230.
Roberts F. S. (1976): Discrete mathematical models with applications to social, biological, and environmental problems.—Englewood Cliffs.
Rozenberg G. S. (1980): Verojatnostnyj podchod k izuĉeniju vremennoj struktury rastitelnovo pokrova. [A probability method of an approach to the investigation of time structure of the plant cover.]—Žur. Obŝĉ. Biol. 41: 372–385.
Rozenberg G. S. (1984): Kvaziimitacionnoje modelirovanije pri issledovaniji suckessii ekosistem. [Quasiimitation modelling in study of ecosystem succession.]—In: Simulace systém⫲ v biologii a medicínê. [Simulation of systems in biology and medicine.]—Praha, Paper No. 411.
Samollov Ju. I. etTarchova T. N. (1985): Analiz sukcessionnoj mozaiki napoĉvennovo pokrova s ispolzo vanijem markovskich modelej. [Markovian models in the analysis of ground cover successional pattern].—Bot. Žur. 70: 12–22.
Shugart H. H. (1984): A theory of forest dynamics.—New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo.
Shugart H. H., Chow T. R. etHett J. M. (1973): Forest succession models: a rationale and methodology for modeling forest succession over large regions.—Forest Sci. 19: 203–212.
Shugart H. H., Hopkins M. S., Burgess I. P. etMortlock A. T. (1981): The development of a succession model for subtropical rain forest and its application to assess the effects of timber harvest at Wiangaree State Forest, New South Wales.—J. Environ. Mgmt. 11: 243–265.
Shugart H. H., McLaughlin S. B. etWest D. C. (1980): Forest models: their development and potential applications for air pollution effects research.—In: Proc. Symp. on effects of air pollutants on Mediterranean and temperate forest ecosystems, June, 1980, Riverside, California, USA., Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-43, p. 203–214.
Shugart H. H. etNoble I. R. (1981): A computer model of succession and fire response of the high altigtudeEucalyptus forest of the Brindabella Range, Australian Capital Territory.— Austr. J. Ecol. 6: 149–164.
Shugart H. H. etWest D. C. (1977): Development of an deciduous forest simulation model and its application to assessment of the impact of the chestnut blight.—J. Environ. Manag. 5: 161–179.
Shugart H. H. etWest D. C. (1980): Forest succession models.—Bio-Science 30: 308–313.
Shugart H. H. etWest D. C. (1981): Long-term dynamics of forest ecosystem.—Amer. Sci. 69: 647–652.
Sklar F. H., Costanza R. etDay J. W. (1985): Dynamic spatial simulation modeling of coastal wetland habitat succession.—Ecol. Modelling 29: 261–281.
Stage A. R. etFerguson D. E. (1982): Regeneration modeling as a component of forest succession simulation.—In:Means J. E. [ed.], Forest succession and stand development research in the Northwest. Proc. Symp., 1981, Corvallis, Oregon, Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., p. 24–30.
Steinhorst R. K., Morgan P. etNeuenschwander L. F. (1985): A stochastic-deterministic simulation model of shrub succession.—Ecol. Modelling 29: 35–55.
Straŝkraba M. (1976): Development of an analytical phytoplankton model with parameters empirically related to dominant controlling variables.—In:Glaser R., Unger K. etKoch K.: Umweltbiophysik.—Akad. Vrlg. Berlin 1976., Abhandl. Akad. Wissensch. DDR 1974, p. 33–65.
Straŝkraba M. (1980): Cybernetic categories of ecosystem dynamics.—J. Int. Soc. Ecol. Modelling 2: 81–96.
Stephens G. R. etWaggoner P. E. (1970): The forest anticipated from 40 years of natural transtion in mixed hardwoods.—Bull. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven. 707: 4–58.
Stephens G. R. etWaggoner P. E. (1980): A half century of natural transitions in mixed hardwood forests.—Bull. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven. 783: 3–41.
Tilman D. (1982): Resource competition and community structure.—Princeton.
Usher M. B. (1979): Markovian approaches to ecological succession.—J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 413–426.
Usher M. B. (1981): Modelling ecological succession, with particular reference to Markovian models.—Vegetatio 46: 11–18.
Van Hecke P., Behaenghe T. J. etImpens I. (1984): A Markovian approach to the dynamics of fertilized permanent grasslands.—Acta Oecol.—Oecol. Appl. 5: 113–126.
Waggoner P. E. etStephens G. R. (1970): Transition probabilities for a forest.—Naturo 225: 1160–1161.
Watt A. S. (1947): Pattern and process in the plant community.—J. Ecol. 35: 1–22.
Weinstein D. A. etShugart H. H. (1983): Ecological modeling of landscape dynamics.— In:Mooney H. A. etGodron M. [eds.], Disturbance and ecosystems.—Berlin, p. 29–45.
West P. W. (1981): Simulation of diameter growth and mortality in regrowth eucalypt forest of southern Tasmania.—Forest Sci. 27: 603–616.
West P. W. (1983): Accuracy and precision of volume estimates from a simulation model for regrowth eucalypt forest.—Aust. For. Res. 13: 183–188.
West D. C., Shugart H. H. etBotkin D. B. [eds.] (1981): Forest succession. Concepts and application. —New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.
West D. C., Smith T. M., Weinstein D. A., etShugart H. H. (1982): Forest succession models and the ecological and management implications.—In:Means J. E. [ed.], Forest succession and stand development research in the Northwest. Proc. Symp., 1981, Corvallis, Oregon, Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State University, p. 5–13.
Whittaker R. H. (1970): Communities and ecosystems.—London and Toronto.
Williams W. T. et al. (1969): Studies in the numerical analysis of complex rain-forest communities. IV. A method for the elucidation of small-scale forest pattern.—J. Ecol. 57: 635–645.
Woods K. E. etWhittaker R. H. (1981): Canopy-understory interaction and the internal dynamics of mature hardwood and hemlock-hardwood forests.—In:West D. C., Shugart H. H. etBotkin D. B. [eds.], Forest succession.—Berlin, p. 305–323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lepš, J. Mathematical modelling of ecological succesion—a review. Folia geobot. phytotax. 23, 79–94 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853297
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853297