Skip to main content
Log in

Marketing controls and employee responses: The moderating role of task characteristics

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A key concern in implementing organizational controls is that little is known about when controls lead to “negative” employee responses. Previous research has suggested that lower levels of negative responses will be observed only if the controls that are being employed “fit” the characteristics of the tasks being controlled. The two task characteristics usually referred to include performance (outcome) documentation and procedural (cause-effect) knowledge. Unlike previous studies, however, this study assumes that the two task characteristics should have a joint, rather than independent, influence on employee responses to controls. The reason is that knowledge of how well one is doing is not sufficient for expecting lower levels of negative responses if information on procedures that may lead to better performance is not available. Knowledge of procedures, likewise, is not sufficient for lower levels of negative responses if performance documentation is not available. Results of an empirical study provide general support for the above line of reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, Chris. 1953. “Human Problems With Budgets.”Harvard Business Review 31 (January/February): 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. Scott and Terry Overton. 1977. “Estimating Non-Response Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, Albert and Daniel Cervone. 1983. “Self-Evaluative and Self Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal Systems.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (November): 1017–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnberg, Jacob G., Lawrence Turopolec, and S. Mark Young. 1983. “The Organizational Context of Accounting.”Accounting, Organizations, and Society 8 (2/3): 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, Hubert M. 1979.Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, Gregory C. 1960. “Test of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions.”Econometrika 28 (July): 591–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Barry E. and Harold S. Guetzkow. 1964.A Social Psychology of Group Processes for Decision-Making. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Lee G. and Masao Nakanishi. 1983. “Standardizing Variables in Multiplicative Choice Models.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (June): 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz, Eric G., T.K. Das, and Anne S. Tsui. 1985. “Toward an Integrative Framework of Organizational Control.”Accounting, Organizations, and Society 10 (1): 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, Lee W. 1982.Handbook of Organizational Behavior Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Mark K. 1981. “Accounting Information and the Evaluation of Subordinate Performance: A Situational Approach.”Accounting Review 56 (October): 771–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1983. “Reliance on Accounting Performance Measures, Task Uncertainty, and Dysfunctional Behavior: Some Extensions.”Journal of Accounting Research 21 (Autumn): 596–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. 1988. “Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Deborah J. MacInnis. 1989. “Marketing Jobs and Management Controls: Toward a Framework.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (November): 406–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, Robert A., Jr. 1979. “Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign.”Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (June): 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Steven. 1990. “Substitutes for Leadership: Some Implications for Organizational Design.” InOrganizational Behavior and Management. Ed. Henry L. Tosi. Boston. MA: PWS-Kent Publishing, pp. 507–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, Fred. 1977.Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Kenneth. 1982. “On the Incidence and Causes of Dysfunctional Side Effects of Control Systems.” Unpublished paper presented at the American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, Reno, NV.

  • Neter, John, William Wasserman, and Michael H. Kutner. 1985.Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs. Second Edition. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. 1978.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, William G. 1979. “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms.”Management Science 25 (September): 833–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, William G. and Margaret A. Maguire. 1975. “Organizational Control: Two Functions.”Administrative Science Quarterly 20 (December): 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Lyman W., Edward E. Lawler III, and Richard J. Hackman. 1975.Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockness, Howard O. and Michael D. Shields. 1984. “Organizational Control Systems in Research and Development.”Accounting, Organizations, and Society 9 (2): 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, Paul R., Michael M. Harris, and John M. Orr. 1986. “On Seeking Moderator Variables in Meta-Analysis of Correlational Data: A Monte Carlo Simulation Investigation of Statistical Power and Resistance to Type I Error.”Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (May): 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, Theodore R. and Vernon L. Allen. 1968. “Increasing Participation in a Natural Group Setting: A Preliminary Report.”The Psychological Record 18 (January): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, James D. 1967.Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, William E. 1974. “Control Systems, Performance, and Satisfaction in Two State Agencies.”Administrative Science Quarterly 19 (March): 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He obtained his Ph.D. at the Ohio State University. His research interests include the areas of international marketing and sales management. He has previously published inAdvances in International Marketing, International Trade Journal, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, and contributed to several national and international conference proceedings.

He obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Texas at Austin. His research interests include sales management, marketing strategy, and international marketing. He has previously published inInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, International Trade Journal, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, and contributed to numerous conference proceedings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, S., Ramaswami, S.N. Marketing controls and employee responses: The moderating role of task characteristics. JAMS 21, 293–306 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894522

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894522

Keywords

Navigation