Abstract
This study develops a scale, using the American Marketing Association’s code of ethics, to measure the marketing-related norms of marketing practitioners. The scale has five dimensions: 1) price and distribution, 2) information and contracts, 3) product and promotion, 4) obligation and disclosure, and 5) general honesty and integrity. The relative influence of personal moral philosophies and organizational ethical climate on the norms of marketers was also examined in this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Marketing Association. 1986. “AMA Again Seeks Input On Proposed Code Ethics.”Marketing News 18 (December 5): 6.
————— 1991. “Neal: Increase Focus on ‘Ethical Practice.’”Marketing Educator 10 (Fall): 1, 3, 7.
Ferrell, O. C. and Larry Gresham. 1985. “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer): 87–96.
Ferrell, O. C., Larry Gresham, and John Fraedrich. 1989. “A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing.”Journal of Macromarketing 11 (Fall): 55–64.
Forsyth, Donelson R. 1980. “A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (March): 175–184.
————— 1992. “Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies.”Journal of Business Ethics 11 (May): 461–470.
Goolsby, Jerry R. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1992. “Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 56 (January): 55–68.
Hair, Joseph F., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, and William C. Black. 1992.Multivariate Data Analysis. Third Edition. New York: Macmillan.
Hunt, Shelby. 1990. “Commentary on an Empirical Investigation of a General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (Spring): 163–171.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Lawrence B. Chonko. 1984. “Marketing and Machiavellianism.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer): 30–42.
Hunt, Shelby D., Lawrence B. Chonko, and James B. Wilcox. 1984. “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August): 309–324.
Hunt, Shelby and Arturo Z. Vasquez-Parraga. 1993. “Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics and Salesforce Supervision.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February): 78–90.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Scott J. Vitell. 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromarketing 8 (Spring): 5–16.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Scott Vitell. 1993. “The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision.” InEthics in Marketing. Eds. N. Craig Smith and John A. Smith. Chicago, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 775–784.
Mayo, Michael A. and Lawrence J. Marks. 1990. “An Empirical Investigation of a General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (Spring): 163–171.
Murphy, Patrick E. and Gene R. Laczniak. 1981. “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchers.” InReview of Marketing 1981. Eds. Ben M. Enis and Kenneth J. Roering. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 251–266.
Murphy, Patrick E. and M. Dee Pridgen. 1987. “Ethical and Legal Issues in Marketing.” Presented at AMA Marketing Ethics Workshop, University of Southern Mississippi.
Myers, John G., William F. Massy, and Stephen A. Greyser. 1980.Marketing Research and Knowledge Development: An Assessment for Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reidenbach, R. Eric and Donald P. Robin. 1988. “Some Initial Steps Toward Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities.”Journal of Business Ethics 7 (November): 871–879.
Reidenbach, R. Eric and Donald P. Robin. 1990. “Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics.”Journal of Business Ethics 9 (August): 639–653.
Reidenbach, R. Eric, Donald P. Robin, and Lyndon Dawson. 1991. “An Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Marketing Practices and Marketing Groups.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19 (Spring): 83–92.
Singhapakdi, Anusorn and Scott J. Vitell. 1990. “Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives.”Journal of Macromarketing 10 (Spring): 4–18.
Singhapakdi, Anusorn and Scott J. Vitell. 1991. “Research Note: Selected Background Factors Influencing Marketers’ Deontological Norms.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19 (Winter): 37–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
He received his Ph.D. in marketing from Texas Tech University. His work has previously appeared in theJournal of Macromarketing, Journal of Business Ethics, Research in Marketing, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, andJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, as well as various other journals and proceedings.
His research has been accepted for publication in theJournal of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management and theJournal of Business Ethics, and has been published in various national and regional proceedings. His research interests include marketing ethics, health care marketing, international marketing, and direct marketing.
He received his Ph.D. in marketing from the University of Mississippi. His work has previously appeared in theJournal of Macromarketing, Journal of Business Ethics, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, andJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, as well as other journals and proceedings.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vitell, S.J., Rallapalli, K.C. & Singhapakdi, A. Marketing norms: The influence of personal moral philosophies and organizational ethical culture. JAMS 21, 331–337 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894525
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894525