Skip to main content
Log in

Switching behavior in automobile markets: A consideration-sets model

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consideration-set formation and the direct and indirect consequences of consideration-set size on switching behavior in automobile markets provide the focus for this model development and testing effort. Empirical support is provided for a model revealing that consideration sets, formed as a consequence of prior experience, product knowledge, and satisfaction, play a substantial role in a consumer’s decision to switch or repurchase the same brand acquired on the previous purchase occasion. Consideration sets are shown to affect the switching decision both directly and indirectly (by motivating retailer search activities).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (May): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, Sharon E. and Scott M. Smith. 1987. “External Search Effort: An Investigation across Several Product Categories.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (June): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, Merrie. 1985. “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 7 (June): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fast, Janet, Richard Vosburgh, and William Frisbee. 1989. “The Effects of Consumer Education on Search.”Journal of Consumer Affairs 23 (Summer): 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T. and Mark A. Pavelchak. 1986. “Category-based versus Piecemeal-based Affective Responses: Developments in Schema-Triggered Affect.” InHandbook of Motivation and Cognition. Ed. Richard M. Sorrentino and E. Tory Higgins. New York: Guilford, 167–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes and Donald F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (February): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furse, David H., Girish N. Punj, and David W. Stewart. 1984. “A Typology of Individual Search Strategies among Purchasers of New Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (March): 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gensch, Dennis. 1987. “A Two-stage Disaggregate Attribute Choice Model.”Marketing Science 6 (Summer): 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jacob and Leon Kaplan. 1972. “The Components of Perceived Risk.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Vol. 3. Ed. M. Venkatesan. Chicago, IL: Association for Consumer Research, 283–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Eric J. and J. Edward Russo. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (June): 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom. 1989.LISREL VII: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Second Edition. Chicago, IL: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom. 1990.SPSS LISREL VII and PRELIS, Users Guide and Reference. Chicago, IL: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, Frank R., Gurumurthy Kalyanaram, Murali Chankrashekaran, and Ronald J. Dornoff. 1993. “Brand Retrieval Consideration Set Composition, Consumer Choice, and the Pioneering Advantage.”Journal of Consumer Research 20 (June): 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaTour, Stephen and Nancy Peat. 1979. “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Satisfaction Research.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Vol. 6. Ed. William L. Wilkie. Miami, FL: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, Prakash. 1990. “Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations.”Journal of Consumer Research 17 (December): 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, Prakash and Vinay Kanetkar. 1992. “Incorporating Consideration Sets into Models of Brand Choice.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Vol. 19. Ed. John F. Sherry and Brian Sternthal. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 251–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. Paul and Jerry C. Olson. 1990.Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy. Second Edition. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, Girish and Richard Staelin. 1983. “A Model of Consumer Information Search Behavior for New Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 9 (March): 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, Marsha L. and Peter H. Bloch. 1991. “Post-purchase Product Satisfaction: Incorporating the Effects of Involvement and Time.”Journal of Business Research 23 (September): 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, Allan D., Moshe Ben-Akiva, Bruno Boccara, and Prakash Nedungadi. 1991. “Consideration Set Influences on Customer Decision-Making and Choice: Issues, Models and Suggestions.”Marketing Letters 2 (August): 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert. 1979.Models of Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, Narasimhan and Brian T. Ratchford. 1991. “An Empirical Test of a Model of External Search for Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 18 (September): 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, Mita. 1985. “Consumer Knowledge Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, Endel and Zena Pearlstone. 1966. “Availability versus Accessibility of Information in Memory for Words.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5 (August): 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, Louis. 1981. “Information Costs, Duration of Search and Turnover: Theory and Applications.”Journal of Political Economy 89 (6): 1122–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Peter L. and Frederic Barbour. 1977. “Phased Decision Strategies: Sequels to an Initial Screening.” InNorth Holland/TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol. 6: Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Eds. Martin K. Starr and Milan Zeleny. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

His research has appeared inJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Advertising, Journal of Economic Psychology, andPsychology and Marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sambandam, R., Lord, K.R. Switching behavior in automobile markets: A consideration-sets model. JAMS 23, 57–65 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894612

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894612

Keywords

Navigation