Skip to main content
Log in

Phytoplankton community composition and size distribution in the Langat River estuary, Malaysia

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phytoplankton patchiness, as expressed by community composition and size distribution, during the rainy season in the Langat River estuary (Malaysia) is described. Four sites in the estuary were sampled on two different occasions. The sampling area covered a stretch of the river from upstream to downstream of aquaculture activities (shrimp farms). Water samples from a shrimp farm outlet were also analyzed for nutrient and phytoplankton content. Differences in community structure between stations were found by means of multivariate procedures. Genera composition and total biomass were related to environmental factors, revealing salinity, light, and nutrients as important explaining factors. Elevated phytoplankton biomass and total phosphorus concentration, as well as lower inorganic nitrogen: phosphorus ratios, were found downstream of the shrimp farming activities. The size distribution spectrum of the phytoplankton population downstream of the shrimp farms was significantly different from that at the other stations but not different than that found in the sampled effluent from the shrimp farms, where phytoplankton biomass was also high. Twenty-two of the 24 recorded genera from the shrimp farm outlet were also found downstream of the farming activities. A number of different environmental factors potentially alter conditions for phytoplankton in the lower reaches of the estuary as compared to the upper regions. A cause and effect relationship explaining the differences noted between the upper and lower reaches of the estuary cannot be established. This study suggests that nutrient enrichment from the shrimp farming activities is of a magnitude that may contribute to the phytoplankton community changes observed in the lower reaches of the estuary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allan, T. F. H., andJ. F. Koonce. 1973. Multivariate approaches to algal stratagems and tactics in systems analysis of phytoplankton.Ecology 54:1234–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M. P., andP. Greig-Smith. 1968. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey. II. Some methodological problems of data from the rain forest.Journal of Ecology 56:827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chongprasith, P., W. Wilairatanadilok, andW. Utoomprurkporn. 1997. ASEAN Marine environment quality criteria (AMEQC) for phosphate, p. 28–33.In G. Vigers, K. S. Ong, C. McPherson, N. Millson, I. Watson, and A. Tang (eds.), ASEAN Environmental Management: Quality Criteria and Monitoring for Aquatic Life and Human Health Protection. Proceedings of the ASEAN-Canada Technical Conference on Marine Science 24–28 June 1996, Penang, Malaysia. EVS Environment Consultans, North Vancouver and Department of Fisheries, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, P., andK. Tanaka. 2000 Nutrient Levels in ponds during the grow-out and harvest Phase ofPenaeus monodon under semi-intensive or intensive culture.JIRCAS Journal 8:3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua T. E., A. S. Ross andH. Yu (eds.). 1997. Malacca Straits Environmental Pofile. MPP-EAS Technical Report no. 10. GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme for the Prevention and Management of Marine Pollution in the East Asian Seas. Quezon City, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 1994. Changes in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory. Bourne Press Limited, Bournemouth, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, K. L. 1999. Nutrients and zooplankton as multiple stressors of phytoplankton communities: Evidence from size structure.Limnological and Oceanography 44:810–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing D. H. 1989. A difference in structure between ecosystems in strongly stratified waters and in those that are only weekly stratified.Journal of Plankton Research 11:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Giorgio, P. A., A. L. Vinocur, R. J. Lombardo, andH. G. Tell. 1991. Progressive changes in the structure and dynamics of the phytoplankton community along a pollution gradient in a lowland river—A multivariate approach.Hydrobiologia 224:129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García de Emiliani, M. O. 1997. Effect of water level fluctuations on phytoplankton in a river-floodplain lake system (Paraná River, Argentina).Hydrobiologia 357:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselain, V., J. Descy, andE. Everbecq. 1994. The phytoplankton community in the river Meuse, Belgium: seasonal dynamics (year 1992) and the possible indices of zooplankton grazing.Hydrobiologia 289:179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S., R. D. Hamilton, II,P. A. Sandifer, C. L. Browdy, andA. L. Stokes. 1993. Effects off water exchange rate on production, water quality, effluent characteristics and nitrogen budgets of intensive shrimp ponds.Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 24:304–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huszar, V. L. M., L. H. S. Silva, P. Domingos, M. Marinho, andS. Melo. 1998. Phytoplankton species composition is more sensitive then OECD criteria to the trophic status of three Brazilian tropical lakes.Hydrobiologia 369/370:59–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. G., L. Legendre, Y. Simard, andS. Lepage. 1985. Phytoplankton response to freshwater runoff: The diversion of the Eastmain River, James Bay.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:1216–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. B., M.J. O'Donohue, J. Udy, andW. C. Dennison. 2001. Assessing ecological impact of shrimp and sewage effluent: Biological indicator with standard water quality analysis.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52:91–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaas, H. 1998. Pelagiale parametre—Fytoplankton. Artssammensætning, antal, biovolumen og kulstofsbiomasse.In H. Kaas and S. Markager (eds.), Teknisk Anvisning for Marin Overvågning. Miljø- og Energimisteriet. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser.http://www2.dmu.dk/1_om_dmu/2_tvaer-unk/3_fdc_mar/programgrundlag/tekanv/kap09.doc

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimor, B. 1992. The impact of eutrophication on phytoplankton composition in costal marine ecosystems, p. 871–879.In R. A. Wollenweider, R. Marchetti, and R. Viviani (eds.), Marine Coastal Eutrophication: The Response of Marine Transitional Systems to Human Impact: Problems and Perspectives for Restoration. Proceedings of an International Conference, Bologna, Italy, 21–24 March 1990. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe, T. 1993. Turbulence, phytoplankton cell size, and the structure of pelagic food webs.Advances in Marine Biology 29:1–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe, T. 1996. Material flux in the water column, p. 167–194.In K. Richardson and B. B. Jørgensen (eds.), Eutrophication in Coastal Marine Ecosystems, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 52. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, H., H. Ishitani, Y. Kuge, andM. Nakamota. 1982. Determination of nitrate in freshwater and seawater by a hydrazine reduction method.Japan Journal of Water Pollution Research 5:35–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuylenstierna, M. 1989-1990. Benthic Algal Vegetation in the Nordre Älv Estuary (Swedish West coast), Volume 1. Department of Marine Botany, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, A. D., L. A. Trott, D. M. Alongi, andA. Davidson. 2002. Water column production and nutrient characteristics in mangrove creeks receiving shrimp farm effluent.Aquaculture Research 33:57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olrik, K. 1991. Planteplanktonmetoder, Prøvetagning, Bearbejdning og Rapportering ved Undersøgelser af Planteplankton i Søer og Marine Områder. Miljøministeriet, Miljøstyrelsen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, C., A. Keller, andL. Reed. 2002. Annual primary production in Narragansett Bay with no bay-wide winter-spring phytoplankton bloom.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 54: 1013–1026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, C., P. Lane, F. French, III, andP. Donaghay. 1989. Phytoplankton species and abundance in response to eutrophication in costal marine mesocosms.Journal of Plankton Research 11: 1223–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. R., Y. Maita, andC. M. Lalli. 1984. A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Pergamon Press, Ltd., Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. J., M. C. M. Beveridge, and R. M. Clarke. 1991. Impact of aquaculture on water resources, p. 568–591.In D. E. Brune, and L. R. Tomasson (eds.), Aquaculture and Water Quality. Advances in World Aquaculture, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

  • Pillay, T. V. R. 1992. Aquaculture and the Environment. Fishing News Books, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, T. U., U. H. Brockmann, C.-D. Duerselen, M. Krause, andH.-J. Rick. 1997. Nutrient and plankton dynamics during a spring drift experiment in the German Bight.Marine Ecology Progress Series 156:275–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S. 1994. The long, the short and the stalled: on the attributes of phytoplankton selected by physical mixing in lakes and rivers.Hydrobiologia 289:9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. andH. Gislason. 1996. Patterns of change in the size spectra of numbers and diversity of the North Sea fish assemblage, as reflected in surveys and models.ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53:1214–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. andB. B. Jørgensen. 1996. Eutrophication: Definition, history and effects, p. 1–19.In K. Richardson and B. B. Jørgensen (eds.), Eutrophication in Coastal Marine Ecosystems, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 52. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Monroy, V. H., C. J. Madden, J. W. Day, Jr.,R. R. Twilley, andV. H. Vera-Herrera. 1998. Annual coupling of a tropical mangrove forest and an estuarine water column: Enhancement of aquatic primary production.Hydrobiologia 379:41–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smayda, T. J. 1983. The phytoplankton of estuaries, p. 65–102.In B. H. Hetchum (ed.), Estuaries and Enclosed Seas. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. G. andM. Munawar. 1986. Plankton size spectra in relation to ecosystem productivity, size, and perturbation.Canadian Journal of Fishery Aquatic Science 43:1789–1794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, J. D. andT. R. Parsons. 1972. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. Bulletin 167, 2nd edition. Fisheries research board of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukiman, S. 1989. The determination of heavy metals in water, suspended material and sediments from Langat River, Malaysia, p. 233–238.In P. G. Sly and B. T. Hart (eds.), Sediment/Water Interaction IV. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. K. 1992. Aquaculture in Malaysia, p. 105–111.In C. Liao, C.-Z. Shyu, and N.-H. Liao (eds.), Aquaculture in Asia: Proceeding of the 1990 APO Symposium on Aquaculture, Taipai. Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, K. andP. Choo. 2000. Influences of nutrient outwelling from the mangrove swamp on the distribution of phytoplankton in the Matang mangrove estuary, Malaysia.Journal of Oceanography 56:69–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thong, K. L., A. Sasekumar, andN. Marshall. 1993. Nitrogen concentrations in a mangrove creek with a large tidal range, peninsular Malaysia.Hydrobiologia 254:125–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trigueros, M. andE. Orive. 2000. Tidally driven distribution of phytoplankton blooms in a shallow, macrotidal estuary.Journal of Plankton Research 22:969–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1993. Quality Criteria for Water. Prepared for Health and Ecological Criteria Division. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, M. G., D. del Rio, M. T. Álverez-Ossorio, andE. Costas. 1991. Factors controlling phytoplankton size class distribution in the upwelling area of the Galician continental shelf (NW Spain).Scientia Marina 55:505–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J., R. A. Park, andJ. F. Koonce. 1980. Dynamic models of lakes ecosystems, p. 455–579.In E. D. Le Cren and R. H. Lowe-McConnel (eds.), The Functioning of Fresh Water Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski, E., S. Spagnol, S. Thomas, K. Moore, D. M. Alongi, L. Trott, andA. Davidson. 2000. Modelling and visualizing the fate of shrimp pond effluent in a mangrove-fringed tidal creek.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50:85–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, F. M., H. B. Matias, A. Anton, andM. M. Zaki. 1998. Phytoplankton population in intensive marine shrimp culture ponds using treated and non-treated water source.Science International (Lahore) 10:245–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Richardson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lassen, M.F., Bramm, M.E., Richardson, K. et al. Phytoplankton community composition and size distribution in the Langat River estuary, Malaysia. Estuaries 27, 716–727 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907655

Keywords

Navigation