Skip to main content
Log in

The peer reviewing process — A case study

European life cycle inventory for surfactant production

  • LCA-Peer Reviews
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Peer Review requires a careful checking of the whole procedure of LCA/LCI, including the quality of data, the system boundaries, the assumptions made and whether or not the method used is compatible with the goal of the study. Most importantly, is has to be ex-aminded whether the results and conclusions are in accord with the quality of the data and with the assumptions made. The Peer Review of the European Life Cycle Inventory for Surfactant Production was conducted between April 1994 and March 1995 and was performed according to the SF.TAC Guidelines (A“Code of Practice” 1993). The main recommendation by the Panel was the full publication of the study. The second main recommendation is to make an update of the database in regular intervals. The third recommendation concerns the format of the international energy database, which should be harmonized.

The authors recommend that the procedure proposed by SF.TAC should be considered within the framework of the ISO LCA-standardization process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Popper, K.R.: Logik der Forschung. 7. Auflage. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen 1982 (1. Auflage: J. Springer, Wien 1934). 1st English edition: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchison, London 1959

    Google Scholar 

  2. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC): Guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment: A“Code of Practice”. Edition 1. From the SETAC Workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 31 March – 3 April 1993. Brussels, Belgium, and Pensacola, Florida, USA, August 1993

  3. Stalmans, M.;Berenbold, H.;Berna, J.L.;Cavalli, L.;Dillar-Stone, A.;Franke, M.;Hirsinger, F.;Janzen, D.;Kosswig, K.;Postlethwaite, D.;Rappert, TH.;Renta, C;Scharer, D.;Schick, K.-P.;Schul, W.;Thomas, H.; vanSloten, R.: European Life-Cycle Inventory for Detergent Surfactants Production. Ten- side Surf. Det. 32 (1995) 84–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Janzen, D.: Methodology of the European Surfactant LCI Study. Tenside Surf. Det. 32 (1995) 110–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Klöpffer, W.;Grieghammer, R.;Sundström, G.: Overview of the Scientific Peer Review of the European Life Cycle Inventory for Surfactant Production. Tenside Surf. Det. 32 (1995) 378–383

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berna, J.L.;Cavalli, L.;Renta, C: A Life-Cycle Inventory for the Production of Linear Alkyl Sulphonates in Europe. Tenside Surf. Det. 32 (1995) 122–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirsinger, F.;Schlick, K.-P.: A Life- Cycle Inventory for the Production of Alcohol Sulphates in Europe. Tenside Surf. Det. 32 (1995)128–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas, H.: A Life-Cycle Inventory for the Production of Alcohol Ethoxy Sulphates in Europe. Tenside Surf. Det. 2 (1995) 140–151

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berenbold, H.;Kosswig, K.: A Life-Cycle Inventory for the Production of Secondary Alkane Sulphonates (SAS) in Europe. Tenside Surf. Det. 32 (1995) 152–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Postlethwaite, D.: A Life-Cycle Inventory for the Production of Soap in Europe. Tenside Surf. Det. 32 (1995) 157–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schul, W.;Hirsinger, F.;Schick, K.-P.: A Life-Cycle Inventory for the Production of Alcohol Ethoxylates in Europe. Tenside Surf. Det. 32(1995) 171–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirsincer, F.;Schick, K.-P.: A Life-Cycle Inventory for the Production of Alkyl Polyglucosides in Europe. Tenside Surf. Det. 32 (1995)193–200

    Google Scholar 

  13. The International Standardization Organization, Technical Committee 207: Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and Framework. Committe Draft ISO/TC 207/SC 5 N 60/CD 14 040.3 from 1995.11.15

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presented by W. Klöpffer at the ECOSOL Public Forum, Brussels, 23 October 1995; a more detailed version has been published in Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents, see reference [5]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klöpffer, W., Sudström, G. & Grießhammer, R. The peer reviewing process — A case study. Int. J. LCA 1, 113–115 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978657

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978657

Key words

Navigation