Abstract
The particular abstractions represented by the terms population and house-hold are central categories in modern demographic analysis. They form the organizing principles of national censuses in Western liberal democracies such as Australia, and profoundly influence both the collection methodology and the content of the collection instrument. This paper argues that these categories are founded on a particular metaphor, the ‘bounded container’, that broadly reflects the population and household structures of sedentary societies such as mainstream Australia. Bounded discrete categories are conducive to the collection of reliable census data in such societies, since unbounded behaviours can be controlled for by statistical means. However, remote Abprogoma; populations behave in radically unbounded ways. This paper proposes that the dominant metaphor underlying Yolngu (and much remote Aboriginal) sociality is, instead, the nodal network. It then explores the consequences of attempting to capture nodal network societies in terms of models based on the bounded container.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J.W. and A.B. Kasakoff. 2004. Spillovers, subdivisions and flows: questioning the usefulness of bounded container as the dominant spatial metaphor in demography. Pp. 343–70 in S. Szreter, H. Sholkamy, and A. Dharmalingam (eds),Categories and Contexts: Anthropological and Historical Studies in Critical Demography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Altman, J.C. (ed.), 1992.A National Survey of Indigenous Australians: Options and Implications. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 3. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University.
Barnes, J. 1967. Inquest on the Murngin.Royal Anthropological Institute Occasional Paper No. 26. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
Berndt, R.M. 1951.Gunapipi. Melbourne: Cheshire.
Berndt, R.M. 1952.Djanggawul. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
Berndt, R.M. 1962.An Adjustment Movement in Amhem Land. Paris: Mouton.
Bledsoe, C. (with contributions by F. Banja). 2002.Contingent Lives: Fertility, Time, and Aging in West Africa. Lewis Henry Morgan Lecture Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caldwell, J.C. 1996. Demography and social science.Population Studies 50(3): 305–333.
Caldwell, J.C., B. Caldwell and P. Caldwell. 1987. Anthropology and demography: the mutual reinforcement of speculation and research.Current Anthropology 28: 25–34.
Caldwell, J.C., A.G. Hill and V.J. Hull (eds). 1988.Micro-Approaches to Demographic Research. London: Kegan Paul International.
Finlayson, J.D. and A.J. Auld. 1999. Shoe or stew? Balancing wants and needs in indigenous households: a study of appropriate income support payments and policies for families.CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 182. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. [Available at http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/discussionl.php]
Greenhalgh, S. 1990. Toward a political economy of fertility: anthropological contributions.Population and Development Review 16(1): 85–106.
Greenhalgh, S. (ed.), 1995.Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henry, R. and A.E. Daly. 2001. Indigenous families and the welfare system: the Kuranda community case study, stage two.CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 216. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. <http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/discussion1.php>
Keen, I. 1994.Knowledge and Secrecy in an Aboriginal Religion: Yolngu of North-East Arnhem Land. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Keen, I. 2003.Aboriginal Economy and Society on the Threshold of Colonisation. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Kertzer, D. I. 2004. Foreword. P. 5 in S. Szreter, H. Sholkamy and A. Dharmalingam (eds),Categories and Contexts: Anthropological and Historical Studies in Critical Demography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kertzer, D.I. and D. Arel (eds). 2001.Census and Identity: the Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kertzer, D.I. and T. Fricke (eds). 1997.Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Maddock, K. 1970. Rethinking the Murngin Problem: a review article.Oceania 41: 77–87.
Martin, D.F. 2002. Counting the Wik: the 2001 Census in Aurukun, western Cape York Peninsula. Pp. 13–28 in D.F. Martinet al., Making Sense of the Census: Observations of the 2001 Enumeration in Remote Aboriginal Australia. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 22. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. [Reprinted in 2004 by ANUE Press; available at<http://epress.anu.edu.au>]
Martin, D.F., F. Morphy, W.G. Sanders and J. Taylor 2002.Making Sense of the Census: Observations of the 2001 Enumeration in Remote Aboriginal Australia. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 22. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. [Reprinted in 2004 by ANU E Press; available at <http://epress.anu.edu.au>]
Martin D.F. and J. Taylor. 1995. Enumerating the Aboriginal population of remote Australia: methodological and conceptual issues.CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 91. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. <http:// www.anu.edu.au/caepr/discussion1.php>
Martin, D.F. and J. Taylor. 1996. Ethnographic perspectives on the enumeration of Aboriginal people in remote Australia.Journal of the Australian Population Association 13(1): 17–33.
Memmott, P., S. Long and L. Thomson. 2006.Indigenous Mobility in Rural and Remote Australia. AHURI Final Report No. 90. Brisbane: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Queensland Research Centre. <http://www.ahuri.edu.au/publications/>
Memmott, P., S. Long, M. Bell, J. Taylor and D. Brown. 2004. Between places: Indigenous mobility in remote and rural Australia.AHURI Positioning Paper No. 81. Brisbane: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Queensland Research Centre. <http://www.ahuri. edu.au/publications/>
Morphy, F. 2002. When systems collide: the 2001 Census at a Northern Territory outstation. Pp. 29–75 in D.F. Martinet al., Making Sense of the Census: Observations of the 2001 Enumeration in Remote Aboriginal Australia. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 22. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. [Reprinted in 2004 by ANUE Press; available at <http://epress.anu.edu.au>]
Morphy, F. 2004. Indigenous household structures and ABS definitions of the family: what happens when systems collide, and does it matter?CAEPR Working Paper No. 26. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. <http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/working.php>
Morphy, F. 2006. Lost in translation? Remote Indigenous households and definitions of the family.Family Matters 73: 23–31.
Morphy, F. (ed.). 2007.Agency, Contingency and Census Process: Observations of the 2006 Indigenous Enumeration Strategy in Remote Aboriginal Australia. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 28. Canberra: ANU E Press. [Available at http://epress.anu.edu.au/]
Morphy, H. 1984.,Journey to the Crocodiles Nest. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Morphy, H. 1991.Ancestral Connections: Art and an Aboriginal System of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Musharbash, Y. 2001. Indigenous families and the welfare system: the Yuendumu community case study, stage two.CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 217. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. <http://www.anu.edu. au/caepr/discussion1.php>
Peterson, N. (in collaboration with J. Long). 1986.Aboriginal Territorial Organization: A Band Perspective. Oceania Monograph No. 30. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Reid, J. 1983.Sorcerers and Healing Spirits: Continuity and Change in an Aboriginal Medical System. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
Riley, N.E. and J. McCarthy. 2003.Demography in the Age of the Postmodern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowse, T. 1988. From houses to households? The Aboriginal Development Commission and economic adaptation by Alice Springs town campers. Pp. 50–65 in J. Beckett (ed.),Aborigines and the State in Australia (special issue ofSocial Analysis, no. 24.)
Scott, J.C. 1998.Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shapiro, W. 1981.Miwuyt Marriage: The Cultural Anthropology of Affinity in Northeast Arnhem Land. Philadelphia: ISHI.
Skinner, G.W. 1997. Family systems and demographic processes. Pp. 53–95 in D.I. Kertzer and T. Fricke (eds),Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Smith, D.E. 1992. The cultural appropriateness of existing survey questions and concepts. Pp. 68–85 in J.C. Altman (ed.),A National Survey of Indigenous Australians: Options and Implications. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 3. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University.
Szreter, S., H. Sholkamy and A. Dharmalingam (eds). 2004.Categories and Contexts: Anthropological and Historical Studies in Critical Demography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, J. 2002. The context for observation. Pp. 1–11 in D.F. Martinet al., Making Sense of the Census: Observations of the 2001 Enumeration in Remote Aboriginal Australia. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 22. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. [Reprinted in 2004 by ANU E Press; available at <http://epress.anu.edu.au>]
Taylor, J. and M. Bell. 2004a. Continuity and change in Indigenous Australian population mobility. Pp. 13–43 in J. Taylor and M. Bell (eds),Population Mobility and Indigenous Peoples in Australasia and North America. London: Routledge.
Taylor, J. and M. Bell (eds). 2004b.Population Mobility and Indigenous Peoples in Australasia and North America. London: Routledge.
Thomson, D.F. 1949.Economic Structure and the Ceremonial Exchange Cycle in Arnhem Land. Melbourne: Macmillan.
Warner, W.L. 1958.A Black Civilization. Chicago: Harper and Row.
Williams, N. 1986.The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and Its Fight for Recognition. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Press.
Williams, N. 1987.Two Laws: Managing Disputes in a Contemporary Aboriginal Community. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Press.
Young, E. 1990. Aboriginal population mobility and service provisions: a framework for analysis. Pp. 186–196 in B. Meehan and N. White (eds),Hunter-Gatherer Demography: Past and Present. Oceania Monograph No. 39. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Young, E. and K. Doohan. 1989.Mobility for Survival: A Process Analysis of Aboriginal Population Movement in Central Australia. North Australia Research Unit Monograph. Darwin: The Australian National University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morphy, F. Uncontained subjects: Population and household in remote aboriginal Australia. Journal of Population Research 24, 163–184 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031929
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031929