Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape-level variables operating at multiple spatial scales likely influence wetland amphibian assemblages but have not been investigated in detail. We examined the significance of habitat loss and fragmentation, as well as selected within-wetland conditions, affecting amphibian assemblages in twenty-one glacial marshes. Wetlands were located within urban and agricultural regions of central and southwestern Minnesota, USA and were distributed across two ecoregions: tallgrass prairie and northern hardwood forest. We surveyed amphibian assemblages and used a geographic information system to quantify land-use variables at three scales: 500, 1000, and 2500 m. Ten species of amphibians were detected, the most abundant beingRana pipiens, Ambystoma tigrinum, andBufo americanus. Amphibian species richness was lower with greater wetland isolation and road density at all spatial scales in both ecoregions. Amphibian species richness also had a negative relationship with the proportion of urban land-use at all spatial scales in the hardwood forest ecoregion, and species richness was greater in wetlands with fish andAmbystoma tigrinum. These biotic relationships are less consistent and more difficult to interpret than are land-use relationships. The data presented here suggest that decreases in landscape connectivity via fragmentation and habitat loss can affect amphibian assemblages, and reversing those landscape changes should be an important part of a regional conservation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Berven, K. A. 1990. Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71:1599–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berven, K. A. and T. A. Grudzien. 1990. Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44:2047–2056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. A. and K. E. Pettit. 1992. Declines in Canadian amphibian populations designing a national monitoring strategy. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Occasional Paper Number 76

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein, A. R., D. B. Wake, and W. P. Sousa. 1994. Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conservation Biology 8:60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein, A. R., P. D. Hoffman, J. M. Kiesecken, and J. B. Hays. 1996. DNA repair activity and resistance to solar UV-B radiation in eggs of the red-legged frog. Conservation Biology 10:1398–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, D. T., T. A. Scott, and J. T. Rotenberry. 1997. Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Conservation Biology 11:406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D. F. 1991. Mass mortality and extinction in a high-elevation population ofRana muscosa. Journal of Herpetology 25:174–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. P., J. H. Thorp, and T. O. Jervey. 1980. Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologica (Berl.) 46:285–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, R. and J. T. Collins 1991. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. 3rd ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E. and C. E. Johnson. 1991. Wetland status and trends in the conterminous United States mid 1970’s to mid-1980’s. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detenbeck, N. E., S. M. Galatowitsch, J. Atkinson, and H. Ball. 1999. Evaluating perturbations and developing restoration strategics for inland wetlands in the Great Lakes Basin. Wetlands 19: (in press).

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute. 1996. ARC/INFO User’s Manual, Release 7.1. ESRI, Redlands, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. and G. Merriam. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conservation Biology 8:50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L., J. H. Pedlar, S. H. Pope, P. D. Taylor, and J. F. Wegner. 1995. Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biological Conservation 73:177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, C. S. and Houlahan, J. 1997. Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology 11:1000–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. N. and H. B. Shaffer. 1996. The decline of amphibians in California’s Great Central Valley. Conservation Biology 10:1387–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S. M. and A. G. van der Valk. 1996. Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S. M., A. G. van der Valk, and R. A. Budelsky. 1998. Decision-making for prairic wetland restoration. Great Plains Research (in press).

  • Gerhardt, H. C., M. B. Ptacek, L. Barnett, and K. G. Torke. 1994. Hybridization in the diploid-tetraploid treefrogsHyla chrysocelis andHyla versicolor. Copeia 1994:51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. E. 1978. The metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newt,Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Ecological Monographs 48:145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and D. Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. p. 5–26.In I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin (eds.) Metapopulation Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S. 1994. Metapopulations and conservation. p. 111–128.In P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb (eds.) Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, M. P. and M. R. Jennings. 1986. Decline of ranid frog species in western North America: are bullfrogs (Rana catebeiana) responsible? Journal of Herpetology 20:490–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar, S. J. and R. T. M’Closkey. 1996. Regional dynamics and the status of amphibians. Ecology 77(7): 2091–2097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar, S. J. and R. T. M’Closkey. 1997a. Spatial scale and determination of species status of the green frog. Conservation Biology 11:670–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar, S. J. and R. T. M’Closkey. 1997b. The effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution. Biological Conservation 79:123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, J. W. and J. J. Peterka. 1974. Age, growth, and food habits of the fathead minnow,Pimephales promelas, in North Dakota saline lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 103:743–756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, G. G. 1987. Hydrogeologic classification of wetlands in glaciated regions. National Wetlands Newsletter 9:6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W. and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karns, D. R. 1986. Field herpetology: methods for the study of amphibians and reptiles in Minnesota. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Bell Museum of Natural History Occasional Paper #18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karns, D. R. 1992. Effects of acidic bog habitats on amphibian reproduction in a northern Minnesota peatland. Journal of Herpetology 26:401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kats, L. B., J. W. Petranka, and A. Sih. 1988. Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesecker, J. M. and A. R. Blaustein. 1997. Influences of egg laying behavior on pathogenic infection of amphibian eggs. Conservation Biology 11:214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laan, R. and B. Verboom. 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54:251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannoo, M. J., K. Lang, T. Waltz, and G. S. Phillips. 1994. An altered amphibian assemblage. Dickinson County, Iowa, 70 years after Frank Blanchard’s survey. American Midland Naturalist 131:311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F., K. R. McDonald, and R. Speare. 1996. Epidemic disease and the catastrophic decline of Australian rain forest frogs. Conservation Biology 10:406–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1969. Some genetic and demographic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, L. E., L. S. Saylor, and M. E. Soulé. 1995. A pH/UV-B synergism in amphibians. Conservation Biology 9:1301–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, G., M. Kozakiewicz, E. Tsuchiya, and K. Hawley. 1989. Barriers as boundaries for metapopulations and demes ofPeromyscus leucopus in farm landscapes. Landscape Ecology 2:227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minton, S. A., Jr. 1968. The fate of amphibians and reptiles in a suburban area. Journal of Herpetology 2:113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, P. J. and E. A. Johnson. 1988. Experimental studies of asymmetrical competition among anurans. Oikos 53:398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B. 1973. Effects of introduced bullfrogs,Rana catesbeiana, on the native frogs of the San Joaquin valley, California. Copeia 1973:18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, B. and J. J. Moriarty. 1994. Amphibians and Reptiles Native to Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, J. H. K., D. E. Scott, J. W. Gibbons, and R. D. Semlitsch. 1989. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, J. H. K., D. E. Scott, R. D. Semlitsch, J. P. Caldwell, L. J. Vitt, and J. W. Gibbons. 1991. Declining amphibian populations: the problem of separating human impacts from natural fluctuations. Science 253:892–895.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterka, J. J. 1989. Fishes in northern prairie wetlands. p. 302–315.In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A. G., C. M. Bull, and L. M. Wheeler. 1992. Habitat choice and predator avoidance in tadpoles. Journal of Herpetology 26:142–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. R. and M. E. Doreas. 1994. Automated data acquisition. p. 47–57.In R.W. Heyer, M.A. Donnelly, R.W. McDiarmid, L.C. Hayek, and M.S. Foster (eds.) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, T. K. 1985. Acid tolerance in amphibians. BioScience 35:239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reh, W. and A. Seitz. 1990. The influence of land use on the genetic structure of populations of the common frogRana temporaria. Biological Conservation 54:239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, K. O. and A. L. Azous. 1995. Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound basin. Wetlands 15:305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadinski, W. J. and W. A. Dunson. 1992. A multilevel study of effects of low pH on amphibians of temporary ponds. Journal of Herpetology 26:413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1996. Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjörgren, P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42:135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren, P. 1994. Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog,Rana lessonae. Ecology 75:1357–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, D. K. 1996. Pond drying, predators, and the distribution ofPseudacris tadpoles. Copeia 1996:599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, D. K. 1997. Tadpole communities. American Scientist 85:36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistix. 1996. Statistix for Windows user’s manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. E. and H. A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Research Publication 92.

  • Taylor, P. D., L. Fahrig, K. Henein, and G. Merriam. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tejedo, M. 1993. Size-dependent vulnerability and behavioral responses of tadpoles of two anuran species to beetle larvae predators. Herpetologica 49:287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., R. May, C. Lehman, and M. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trexler, J. C. and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74:1629–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. B. 1960. Population structure and dynamics of the western spotted frog. Ecological Monographs 30:251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dorp, D. and P. F. M. Opdam. 1987. Effects of patch size, isolation, and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecology 1:59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verboom, J., A. Schotman, P. Opdam, and J. A. J. Metz. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61:149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D. B. 1991. Declining amphibian populations. Science 253:860.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. 1991. Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72:1709–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wik, D. 1996. Sampling larval amphibians by bottletrap: development of an activity trap system. www.im.nbs.gov/naamp3/papers/40n.html.In Third Annual Meeting of the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program,www.im.nbs.gov/naamp3/naamp3.html.

  • Winter, T.C. 1988. Conceptual framework for assessment of cumulative impacts on the hydrology of non-tidal wetlands. Environmental Management 12:605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, R. L. 1988. Soil acidity and moisture and the distribution of amphibians in five forests of southcentral New York. Copeia 1988:394–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehtinen, R.M., Galatowitsch, S.M. & Tester, J.R. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19, 1–12 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161728

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161728

Key Words

Navigation