Skip to main content
Log in

Two-stage explicit Runge-Kutta type methods using derivatives

  • Published:
Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-stage explicit Runge-Kutta type methods using derivatives for the systemy′(t) =f(y(t)),y(t 0) =y 0 are considered. Derivatives in the first stage have the standard form, but in the second stage, they have the form included in the limiting formula. The κth-order Taylor series method uses derivativesf∼’,f∼",…,f (κ−1) Though the values of derivatives can be easily obtained by using automatic differentiation, the cost increases proportional to square of the order of differentiation. Two-stage methods considered here use the derivatives up tof (κ−3) in the first stage andf,f∼’ in the second stage. They can achieve κth-order accuracy and construct embedded formula for the error estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Bischof, A. Carle, G. Corliss, A. Griewank and P. Hovland, ADIFOR—Generating derivative codes from Fortran programs. Scientific Programming,1 (1992), 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Bulirsch and J. Stoer, Numerical treatment of ordinary differential equations by extrapolation methods. Numer. Math.,8 (1966), 1–13.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J.C. Butcher, The Numerical Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Hairer, S.P. Nørsett and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I, Non stiff Problems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Iri, Simultaneous Computation of Functions, Partial Derivatives and Estimates of Rounding Errors — Complexity and Practicality —. Japan J. Appl. Math.,1 (1984), 223–252.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Kubota, PADRE2, a FORTRAN precompiler yielding error estimates and second derivatives. Proc. SIAM Workshop on Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms — Theory, Implementation and Application, 1991.

  7. NUMPAC vol.3, User’s guide for library programs. Computer Center, Nagoya Univ., 1991 (in Japanese).

  8. H. Ono, Five and six stage Runge-Kutta type formulas of orders numerically five and six. J. Inform. Process.,12 (1989), 251–260.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Ono, Limiting formulas of nine-stage explicit Runge-Kutta methods of order eight. Trans. IPS Japan,38 (1997), 1886–1893.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Ono and H. Toda, Explicit Runge-Kutta methods using second derivatives. Ann. Numer. Math.,1 (1994), 171–182.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. L.B. Rall, Automatic Differentiation: Techniques and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science120, Springer, 1981.

  12. H. Toda, On the truncation error of a limiting formula of Runge-Kutta methods. Trans. IPS Japan,21 (1980), 285–296 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Yoshida, Automatic derivative derivation system. Trans. IPS Japan,30 (1989), 799–806 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Yoshida and H. Ono, Two stage explicit Runge-Kutta Type method using second and third derivatives. Trans. IPS Japan,44, No. 1 (2003), 82–87.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Ono.

About this article

Cite this article

Ono, H., Yoshida, T. Two-stage explicit Runge-Kutta type methods using derivatives. Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math. 21, 361–374 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167588

Key words

Navigation