Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internationally, educational stakeholders are concerned with the high levels of student disengagement, evidenced by early school leaving, poor student behaviour, and low levels of academic achievement. The solution, student engagement, is a contested concept, theorised in a variety of different ways within academic literature. To further understand this concept, a phenomenographic study was conducted to map secondary school teachers’ conceptions of student engagement. Six qualitatively different ways of understanding student engagement were found. This research indicates that teachers do not hold similar understandings of what student engagement means. If the concept of engagement is to become educationally fruitful, the term must be more explicitly defined in educational research and government policy documents to promote shared understandings amongst stakeholder groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationships with strategy use and school achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. (2002).Principles and Practice in Phenomenographic Research. Paper presented at the Current Issues in Phenomenography Conference, Canberra, ACT.

  • Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Check & connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school.Journal of School Psychology, 42, 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (1998). What is the ‘world’ of phenomenography?Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research.Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P., Modell, J., Bartko, W. T., Secada, W., Fredricks, J., Friedel, J., et al. (2005). School engagement of inner-city students during middle childhood. In C. Cooper, C. G. Coll, W. T. Bartko, H. Davis, & C. Chatman (Eds.),Developmental Pathway Through Middle Childhood: Rethinking Contexts and Diversity as Resources. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. (1996). Phenomenographic research — Some methodological issues. In G. Dall’Alba, & B. Hasselgren (Eds.),Reflections on Phenomenography: Toward a Methodology. Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, A., & Bowen, G. (2004). Teacher support and school engagement of Latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure.Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21(1), 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A., Todd, A., Tofflemoyer, S., & Horner, R. (2003). Use of functional assessment and a self-management system to increase academic engagement and work completion.Journal of Positive Behaviour Interventions, 5(3), 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. (1996).Information literacy: A phenomenography. Unpublished PhD, University of Queensland, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler-Kisber, L., & Portelli, J. (2003). The challenge of student engagement: Beyond mainstream conceptions and practices.McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2002).The middle years of schooling in Queensland: A way forward. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Cothran, D. J., & Ennis, C. D. (2000). Building bridges to student engagement: Communicating respect and care for students in urban high schools.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(4), 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2003).See the Future: The Middle Phase of Learning State School Action Plan. Brisbane: Queensland Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. (1989). Withdrawing from school.Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J., & Rock, D. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J., & Voelkl, K. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement.Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyrkas, K., & Paunonen-Ilmonen. (2001). The effects of clinical supervision on the quality of care: Examining the results of team supervision.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W. J., & Nettles, S. M. (1999).How Students Invest Their Time out of School: Effects on School Engagement, Life Chances and Achievement (No. 29). Washington DC: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Dwyer, P., & Wyn, J. (2000).Non-Completion of School in Australia: The Changing Patterns of Participation and Outcomes. Camberwell, Vic: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Walstab, A., Tesse, R., Vickers, M., & Rumberger, R. (2004).Staying on at School: Improving Student Retention in Australia (Report for the Queensland Department of Education and the Arts). Melbourne: Centre for Post-compulsory Education and Lifelong Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamborn, S. D., Brown, B. B., Mounts, N. S., & Steinberg, L. (1992). Putting school in perspective: The influence of family, peers, extracurricular participation, and parttime work on academic engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.),Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004).A handbook for teacher research. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2005).Freedom and Learning in the Network Society. Paper presented at the 12th Learning Conference, Granada, Andalucia.

  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom.Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us.Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography — A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality.Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.),The International Encyclopedia of Education, Volume 8. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (2000). The structure of awareness. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography.Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. Tsui (Eds.),Classroom discourses and the space of learning. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.),The experience of learning. Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, J. D., Mason, J., Perkerson, K., & Clifford, M. (1975). Relationship between classroom behaviour and academic achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 198–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J., & Marks, G. N. (2003).School leavers in Australia: Profiles and pathways (No. 31). Camberwell: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others and perceived ability.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2005).Issues Paper 6: Students 15–19 Years Old: Increasing Engagement. Retrieved January 4, 2006 from New South Wales Government, Department of Education and Training Web site: http://www.det.nsw.edu.au/reviews/futuresproject/issuespapers/stdnt_15to19yrs.htm

  • Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.),Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement.Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, E., & Rollefson, M. (1995).Extracurricular Participation and Student Engagement. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2000).What Works in Innovation in Education: Motivating Students for Lifelong Learning. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, K. (1998).Teaching and Learning: The Construction of an Object of Study. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, D. C. (2001).‘Doing School’: How We Are Creating a Generation of Stressed Out, Materialistic and Miseducated Students. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government. (2002).Education and Training Reforms for the Future: A White Paper. Brisbane: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable?Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory.School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirin, S., & Rogers-Sirin, L. (2004). Exploring school engagement of middle-class African American adolescents.Youth and Society, 35(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjostrom, B., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Nursing theory and concept development or analysis: Applying phenomenography in nursing research.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(3), 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year.Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, W. J. (1980). Pupil engaged learning time: Concepts, findings and implications.The Australian Journal of Education, 24(3), 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography.Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viadero, D. (2004).New Inquiry to Measure Student Engagement. Retrieved November 15, 2005 from Indiana University, Bloomington Web site: http://www.iub.edu/~nsse/hssse/news_articles/Education_Week_1_21_04.htm

  • Walsh, E. (2000). Phenomenographic analysis of interview transcripts. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.),Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehlage, G. G., & Smith, G. A. (1992). Building new programs for students at risk. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.),Student Engagement and Academic Achievement in American Secondary Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (2003).Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation (Results from PISA 2000). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. (2003).Meeting the Workforce Demands of Hong Kong’s New Era in Secondary Business Education: Business Teachers’ Conceptions of Students’ Competence and Choice of Teaching Strategies. Unpublished PhD, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Auckland, New Zealand

    Lois Ruth Harris

Authors
  1. Lois Ruth Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, L.R. A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. Aust. Educ. Res. 35, 57–79 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216875

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216875

Keywords

Search

Navigation