Skip to main content
Log in

Eine Untersuchung zur Diskussion über Schwierigkeiten im Umgang mit dem Konvergenzbegriff

  • Published:
Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primarily the controverse discussions in didactical research concerning the foundations of analysis — especially the different approaches to the limit concept — are considered. In the recent years many suggestions have been made to overcome the difficulties of the “usual” limit concept (Epsilon-no, Epsilon-Delta Definition). The didactical analysis of these difficulties and the suggestions to overcome them led to the development of some new curricula. Hence it is now necessary to examine if the analysis of these difficulties exactly reflects the difficulties which pupils really have. In a first step the consequences of the above mentioned didactical analysis are transformed into questions which the authors — in a second step — tried to answer in the last three years by different tests which were presented to pupils and students. The results of these tests are reported and the consequences of these results are compared with different observations of other authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Verzeichnis der zitierten Literatur

  1. Blum, W.: Zum vereinfachten Grenzwertbegriff in der Differentialrechnung. In: MU (1979), Heft 3

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bock, H.: Automatische Klassifikation. In: Verlag Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Byers, V. & Herscovics, N.: Understanding School mathematics. In: Mathematics Teaching, No 81, (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Churchman: A Comparative Study of Three Different Approaches To The Limit Concept. In: Diss. Univ. Georgia (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer, R.: Die Rolle des Exaktifizierens im Analysis-Unterricht. In: DdM (1978), Heft 3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knoche, N.: Zum Problem exakter Begriffsbildungen im Analysisunterricht. In: Schriftenreihe des IDM. Bielefeld 7/1976/81

    Google Scholar 

  7. Otte, M. & Steinbring, H.: Probleme der Begriffsentwicklung zum Stetigkeitsbegriff. In: DdM (1977), Heft 1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pfanzagl, J.: Allgmeine Methodenlehre der Statistik II. In: Verlag de Gruyter (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pickert, G.: Analysis in der Kollegstufe. In: MU (1976), Heft 5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Skemp, R.R.: Symbolic understanding. In: Mathematics Teaching, No 99, (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seyfferth, S.: Ein Vorschlag zur Milderung der Diskrepanz zwischen naivanschaulichem Verständnis und exakter Definition des Grenzwertes einer Funktion. In: DdM (1975), Heft 4

    Google Scholar 

  12. SPSS: Statistical Package For The Social Sciences. In: Mac Graw Hill, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herden, G., Knoche, N. & Pickartz, U. Eine Untersuchung zur Diskussion über Schwierigkeiten im Umgang mit dem Konvergenzbegriff. JMD 4, 263–305 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339236

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339236

Navigation